Cargando…
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study
PURPOSE: Transvaginal mesh (TVM) results in a greater anatomic cure but more complications. We aimed to compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) plus colporrhaphy with the small intestine submucosa (SIS) graft versus TVM for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Patients with advanced POP...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Continence Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31260614 http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938014.007 |
_version_ | 1783431995073757184 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Junyan Wang, Xiaojuan Hua, Keqin Chen, Yisong |
author_facet | Wang, Junyan Wang, Xiaojuan Hua, Keqin Chen, Yisong |
author_sort | Wang, Junyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Transvaginal mesh (TVM) results in a greater anatomic cure but more complications. We aimed to compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) plus colporrhaphy with the small intestine submucosa (SIS) graft versus TVM for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Patients with advanced POP who underwent LSC plus colporrhaphy with the SIS graft or TVM at a center between September 2015 and November 2016 were studied. Anatomical outcomes were evaluated using POP quantification. Functional outcomes related to POP and sexual life were evaluated using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Data regarding surgical procedures and patient demographic variables were recorded. Chi-square and Student t -tests were used for 2 independent samples. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study with 26 patients in the LSC plus colporrhaphy with the SIS graft group (group A) and 50 patients with TVM group (group B). All patients in both groups demonstrated significant improvement in anatomical outcomes (P<0.05) after surgery. PFDI-20 scores were significantly improved 12 months after operation in both groups (P<0.001). PISQ-12 scores were significantly improved in patients after surgery, especially patients in group A (P<0.001). Mesh exposure occurred in both groups as follows: 8 patients (30.7%) in group A and 5 patients (10%) in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Even though both surgeries showed excellent results for subjective and objective outcomes, the use of an SIS graft might increase the exposure of polypropylene mesh. We do not recommend LSC plus colporrhaphy with the SIS graft for advanced multiple-compartments prolapse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6606933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Continence Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66069332019-07-10 Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study Wang, Junyan Wang, Xiaojuan Hua, Keqin Chen, Yisong Int Neurourol J Original Article PURPOSE: Transvaginal mesh (TVM) results in a greater anatomic cure but more complications. We aimed to compare laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) plus colporrhaphy with the small intestine submucosa (SIS) graft versus TVM for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Patients with advanced POP who underwent LSC plus colporrhaphy with the SIS graft or TVM at a center between September 2015 and November 2016 were studied. Anatomical outcomes were evaluated using POP quantification. Functional outcomes related to POP and sexual life were evaluated using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Data regarding surgical procedures and patient demographic variables were recorded. Chi-square and Student t -tests were used for 2 independent samples. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study with 26 patients in the LSC plus colporrhaphy with the SIS graft group (group A) and 50 patients with TVM group (group B). All patients in both groups demonstrated significant improvement in anatomical outcomes (P<0.05) after surgery. PFDI-20 scores were significantly improved 12 months after operation in both groups (P<0.001). PISQ-12 scores were significantly improved in patients after surgery, especially patients in group A (P<0.001). Mesh exposure occurred in both groups as follows: 8 patients (30.7%) in group A and 5 patients (10%) in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Even though both surgeries showed excellent results for subjective and objective outcomes, the use of an SIS graft might increase the exposure of polypropylene mesh. We do not recommend LSC plus colporrhaphy with the SIS graft for advanced multiple-compartments prolapse. Korean Continence Society 2019-06 2019-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6606933/ /pubmed/31260614 http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938014.007 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Continence Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wang, Junyan Wang, Xiaojuan Hua, Keqin Chen, Yisong Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title | Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Plus Colporrhaphy With an Small Intestine Submucosa Graft Versus Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction for Advanced Prolapse: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus colporrhaphy with an small intestine submucosa graft versus total pelvic floor reconstruction for advanced prolapse: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31260614 http://dx.doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938014.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjunyan laparoscopicsacrocolpopexypluscolporrhaphywithansmallintestinesubmucosagraftversustotalpelvicfloorreconstructionforadvancedprolapsearetrospectivecohortstudy AT wangxiaojuan laparoscopicsacrocolpopexypluscolporrhaphywithansmallintestinesubmucosagraftversustotalpelvicfloorreconstructionforadvancedprolapsearetrospectivecohortstudy AT huakeqin laparoscopicsacrocolpopexypluscolporrhaphywithansmallintestinesubmucosagraftversustotalpelvicfloorreconstructionforadvancedprolapsearetrospectivecohortstudy AT chenyisong laparoscopicsacrocolpopexypluscolporrhaphywithansmallintestinesubmucosagraftversustotalpelvicfloorreconstructionforadvancedprolapsearetrospectivecohortstudy |