Cargando…
The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease
Fabry disease (FD) patients may suffer from objective cognitive impairment (OCI). This study assessed the accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to screen for OCI in FD patients. Presence or absence of OCI was established using a neuropsychological test battery. For different MMSE cuto...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12036 |
_version_ | 1783432006112116736 |
---|---|
author | Körver, Simon van de Schraaf, Sara A. J. Geurtsen, Gert J. Hollak, Carla E. M. van Schaik, Ivo N. Langeveld, Mirjam |
author_facet | Körver, Simon van de Schraaf, Sara A. J. Geurtsen, Gert J. Hollak, Carla E. M. van Schaik, Ivo N. Langeveld, Mirjam |
author_sort | Körver, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fabry disease (FD) patients may suffer from objective cognitive impairment (OCI). This study assessed the accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to screen for OCI in FD patients. Presence or absence of OCI was established using a neuropsychological test battery. For different MMSE cutoffs sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and clinical utility index (CUI) to identify OCI were calculated. Eighty‐one patients were included (mean age 44.5 ± 14.3, 35% men, 74% classical phenotype) of which 13 patients (16%) had OCI. The median MMSE score was 29 (range: 25‐30). MMSE cutoffs ≤28 and ≤29 had the highest sensitivity and specificity, with higher specificity reached at cutoff ≤28 (sensitivity: .46, specificity: .73) and higher sensitivity at cutoff ≤29 (sensitivity: .92, specificity: .40). PPV was low for both cutoffs (PPV ≤28: .25, PPV ≤29: .23) resulting in a low positive CUI (case finding ability). The results of our study indicate that the MMSE does not accurately screen for OCI in FD, with poor sensitivity‐specificity trade‐off at all cutoffs. The low PPV shows that the majority of FD patients that score below the cutoffs do not suffer from OCI. Administering the MMSE as a screening test will lead to unnecessary referrals for neuropsychological testing, which is time consuming and burdensome. Screening tools designed to accurately detect mild (executive) impairment might prove more appropriate to screen for OCI in FD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6606981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66069812019-08-07 The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease Körver, Simon van de Schraaf, Sara A. J. Geurtsen, Gert J. Hollak, Carla E. M. van Schaik, Ivo N. Langeveld, Mirjam JIMD Rep Research Reports Fabry disease (FD) patients may suffer from objective cognitive impairment (OCI). This study assessed the accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to screen for OCI in FD patients. Presence or absence of OCI was established using a neuropsychological test battery. For different MMSE cutoffs sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and clinical utility index (CUI) to identify OCI were calculated. Eighty‐one patients were included (mean age 44.5 ± 14.3, 35% men, 74% classical phenotype) of which 13 patients (16%) had OCI. The median MMSE score was 29 (range: 25‐30). MMSE cutoffs ≤28 and ≤29 had the highest sensitivity and specificity, with higher specificity reached at cutoff ≤28 (sensitivity: .46, specificity: .73) and higher sensitivity at cutoff ≤29 (sensitivity: .92, specificity: .40). PPV was low for both cutoffs (PPV ≤28: .25, PPV ≤29: .23) resulting in a low positive CUI (case finding ability). The results of our study indicate that the MMSE does not accurately screen for OCI in FD, with poor sensitivity‐specificity trade‐off at all cutoffs. The low PPV shows that the majority of FD patients that score below the cutoffs do not suffer from OCI. Administering the MMSE as a screening test will lead to unnecessary referrals for neuropsychological testing, which is time consuming and burdensome. Screening tools designed to accurately detect mild (executive) impairment might prove more appropriate to screen for OCI in FD. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6606981/ /pubmed/31392113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12036 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of SSIEM. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Körver, Simon van de Schraaf, Sara A. J. Geurtsen, Gert J. Hollak, Carla E. M. van Schaik, Ivo N. Langeveld, Mirjam The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease |
title | The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease |
title_full | The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease |
title_fullStr | The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease |
title_short | The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease |
title_sort | mini mental state examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in fabry disease |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT korversimon theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT vandeschraafsaraaj theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT geurtsengertj theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT hollakcarlaem theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT vanschaikivon theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT langeveldmirjam theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT korversimon minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT vandeschraafsaraaj minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT geurtsengertj minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT hollakcarlaem minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT vanschaikivon minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease AT langeveldmirjam minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease |