Cargando…

The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease

Fabry disease (FD) patients may suffer from objective cognitive impairment (OCI). This study assessed the accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to screen for OCI in FD patients. Presence or absence of OCI was established using a neuropsychological test battery. For different MMSE cuto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Körver, Simon, van de Schraaf, Sara A. J., Geurtsen, Gert J., Hollak, Carla E. M., van Schaik, Ivo N., Langeveld, Mirjam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12036
_version_ 1783432006112116736
author Körver, Simon
van de Schraaf, Sara A. J.
Geurtsen, Gert J.
Hollak, Carla E. M.
van Schaik, Ivo N.
Langeveld, Mirjam
author_facet Körver, Simon
van de Schraaf, Sara A. J.
Geurtsen, Gert J.
Hollak, Carla E. M.
van Schaik, Ivo N.
Langeveld, Mirjam
author_sort Körver, Simon
collection PubMed
description Fabry disease (FD) patients may suffer from objective cognitive impairment (OCI). This study assessed the accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to screen for OCI in FD patients. Presence or absence of OCI was established using a neuropsychological test battery. For different MMSE cutoffs sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and clinical utility index (CUI) to identify OCI were calculated. Eighty‐one patients were included (mean age 44.5 ± 14.3, 35% men, 74% classical phenotype) of which 13 patients (16%) had OCI. The median MMSE score was 29 (range: 25‐30). MMSE cutoffs ≤28 and ≤29 had the highest sensitivity and specificity, with higher specificity reached at cutoff ≤28 (sensitivity: .46, specificity: .73) and higher sensitivity at cutoff ≤29 (sensitivity: .92, specificity: .40). PPV was low for both cutoffs (PPV ≤28: .25, PPV ≤29: .23) resulting in a low positive CUI (case finding ability). The results of our study indicate that the MMSE does not accurately screen for OCI in FD, with poor sensitivity‐specificity trade‐off at all cutoffs. The low PPV shows that the majority of FD patients that score below the cutoffs do not suffer from OCI. Administering the MMSE as a screening test will lead to unnecessary referrals for neuropsychological testing, which is time consuming and burdensome. Screening tools designed to accurately detect mild (executive) impairment might prove more appropriate to screen for OCI in FD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6606981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66069812019-08-07 The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease Körver, Simon van de Schraaf, Sara A. J. Geurtsen, Gert J. Hollak, Carla E. M. van Schaik, Ivo N. Langeveld, Mirjam JIMD Rep Research Reports Fabry disease (FD) patients may suffer from objective cognitive impairment (OCI). This study assessed the accuracy of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to screen for OCI in FD patients. Presence or absence of OCI was established using a neuropsychological test battery. For different MMSE cutoffs sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and clinical utility index (CUI) to identify OCI were calculated. Eighty‐one patients were included (mean age 44.5 ± 14.3, 35% men, 74% classical phenotype) of which 13 patients (16%) had OCI. The median MMSE score was 29 (range: 25‐30). MMSE cutoffs ≤28 and ≤29 had the highest sensitivity and specificity, with higher specificity reached at cutoff ≤28 (sensitivity: .46, specificity: .73) and higher sensitivity at cutoff ≤29 (sensitivity: .92, specificity: .40). PPV was low for both cutoffs (PPV ≤28: .25, PPV ≤29: .23) resulting in a low positive CUI (case finding ability). The results of our study indicate that the MMSE does not accurately screen for OCI in FD, with poor sensitivity‐specificity trade‐off at all cutoffs. The low PPV shows that the majority of FD patients that score below the cutoffs do not suffer from OCI. Administering the MMSE as a screening test will lead to unnecessary referrals for neuropsychological testing, which is time consuming and burdensome. Screening tools designed to accurately detect mild (executive) impairment might prove more appropriate to screen for OCI in FD. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6606981/ /pubmed/31392113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12036 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of SSIEM. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Körver, Simon
van de Schraaf, Sara A. J.
Geurtsen, Gert J.
Hollak, Carla E. M.
van Schaik, Ivo N.
Langeveld, Mirjam
The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease
title The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease
title_full The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease
title_fullStr The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease
title_full_unstemmed The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease
title_short The Mini Mental State Examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in Fabry Disease
title_sort mini mental state examination does not accurately screen for objective cognitive impairment in fabry disease
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12036
work_keys_str_mv AT korversimon theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT vandeschraafsaraaj theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT geurtsengertj theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT hollakcarlaem theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT vanschaikivon theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT langeveldmirjam theminimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT korversimon minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT vandeschraafsaraaj minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT geurtsengertj minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT hollakcarlaem minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT vanschaikivon minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease
AT langeveldmirjam minimentalstateexaminationdoesnotaccuratelyscreenforobjectivecognitiveimpairmentinfabrydisease