Cargando…
When “Good Evidence” Is Not Enough: A Case of Global Malaria Policy Development
This paper presents findings from a case study of two different policy development processes within the WHO's malaria department. By comparing the policy processes for the interventions of intermittent preventive treatment in infants versus children, the findings suggest that “good evidence” fr...
Autores principales: | D'Souza, Bianca J., Parkhurst, Justin O. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31565347 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700077 |
Ejemplares similares
-
When There Is Not Enough Evidence and When Evidence Is Not Enough: An Australian Indigenous Smoking Policy Study
por: Vujcich, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
When is good, good enough? Methodological pragmatism for sustainable guideline development
por: Browman, George P, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Real-time linkage: when is near enough good enough?
por: Irvine, Katrina, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Strengthening the policy setting process for global malaria control and elimination
por: D'Souza, Bianca J, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Noninferior Antibiotics: When Is “Not Bad” “Good Enough”?
por: DiNubile, Mark J.
Publicado: (2016)