Cargando…
Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hospital penalization in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) and subsequent changes in clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Regression discontinuity design applied to a retrospective cohort from inpatient Medicare claims. SETTING: 3238 ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31270062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4109 |
_version_ | 1783432047762604032 |
---|---|
author | Sankaran, Roshun Sukul, Devraj Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna Gulseren, Baris Engler, Tedi A Arntson, Emily Zlotnick, Hanna Dimick, Justin B Ryan, Andrew M |
author_facet | Sankaran, Roshun Sukul, Devraj Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna Gulseren, Baris Engler, Tedi A Arntson, Emily Zlotnick, Hanna Dimick, Justin B Ryan, Andrew M |
author_sort | Sankaran, Roshun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hospital penalization in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) and subsequent changes in clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Regression discontinuity design applied to a retrospective cohort from inpatient Medicare claims. SETTING: 3238 acute care hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged from acute care hospitals between 23 July 2014 and 30 November 2016 and eligible for at least one targeted hospital acquired condition (n=15 470 334). INTERVENTION: Hospital receipt of a penalty in the first year of the HACRP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Episode level count of targeted hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes, 30 day readmissions, and 30 day mortality. RESULTS: Of 724 hospitals penalized under the HACRP in fiscal year 2015, 708 were represented in the study. Mean counts of hospital acquired conditions were 2.72 per 1000 episodes for penalized hospitals and 2.06 per 1000 episodes for non-penalized hospitals; 30 day readmissions were 14.4% and 14.0%, respectively, and 30 day mortality was 9.0% for both hospital groups. Penalized hospitals were more likely to be large, teaching institutions, and have a greater share of patients with low socioeconomic status than non-penalized hospitals. HACRP penalties were associated with a non-significant change of −0.16 hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes (95% confidence interval −0.53 to 0.20), −0.36 percentage points in 30 day readmission (−1.06 to 0.33), and −0.04 percentage points in 30 day mortality (−0.59 to 0.52). No clear patterns of clinical improvement were observed across hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Penalization was not associated with significant changes in rates of hospital acquired conditions, 30 day readmission, or 30 day mortality, and does not appear to drive meaningful clinical improvements. By disproportionately penalizing hospitals caring for more disadvantaged patients, the HACRP could exacerbate inequities in care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6607204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66072042019-07-18 Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study Sankaran, Roshun Sukul, Devraj Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna Gulseren, Baris Engler, Tedi A Arntson, Emily Zlotnick, Hanna Dimick, Justin B Ryan, Andrew M BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hospital penalization in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) and subsequent changes in clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Regression discontinuity design applied to a retrospective cohort from inpatient Medicare claims. SETTING: 3238 acute care hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged from acute care hospitals between 23 July 2014 and 30 November 2016 and eligible for at least one targeted hospital acquired condition (n=15 470 334). INTERVENTION: Hospital receipt of a penalty in the first year of the HACRP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Episode level count of targeted hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes, 30 day readmissions, and 30 day mortality. RESULTS: Of 724 hospitals penalized under the HACRP in fiscal year 2015, 708 were represented in the study. Mean counts of hospital acquired conditions were 2.72 per 1000 episodes for penalized hospitals and 2.06 per 1000 episodes for non-penalized hospitals; 30 day readmissions were 14.4% and 14.0%, respectively, and 30 day mortality was 9.0% for both hospital groups. Penalized hospitals were more likely to be large, teaching institutions, and have a greater share of patients with low socioeconomic status than non-penalized hospitals. HACRP penalties were associated with a non-significant change of −0.16 hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes (95% confidence interval −0.53 to 0.20), −0.36 percentage points in 30 day readmission (−1.06 to 0.33), and −0.04 percentage points in 30 day mortality (−0.59 to 0.52). No clear patterns of clinical improvement were observed across hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Penalization was not associated with significant changes in rates of hospital acquired conditions, 30 day readmission, or 30 day mortality, and does not appear to drive meaningful clinical improvements. By disproportionately penalizing hospitals caring for more disadvantaged patients, the HACRP could exacerbate inequities in care. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6607204/ /pubmed/31270062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4109 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Sankaran, Roshun Sukul, Devraj Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna Gulseren, Baris Engler, Tedi A Arntson, Emily Zlotnick, Hanna Dimick, Justin B Ryan, Andrew M Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study |
title | Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | changes in hospital safety following penalties in the us hospital acquired condition reduction program: retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31270062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sankaranroshun changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy AT sukuldevraj changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy AT nuliyaluushapoorna changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy AT gulserenbaris changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy AT englertedia changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy AT arntsonemily changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy AT zlotnickhanna changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy AT dimickjustinb changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy AT ryanandrewm changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy |