Cargando…

Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hospital penalization in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) and subsequent changes in clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Regression discontinuity design applied to a retrospective cohort from inpatient Medicare claims. SETTING: 3238 ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sankaran, Roshun, Sukul, Devraj, Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna, Gulseren, Baris, Engler, Tedi A, Arntson, Emily, Zlotnick, Hanna, Dimick, Justin B, Ryan, Andrew M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31270062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4109
_version_ 1783432047762604032
author Sankaran, Roshun
Sukul, Devraj
Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna
Gulseren, Baris
Engler, Tedi A
Arntson, Emily
Zlotnick, Hanna
Dimick, Justin B
Ryan, Andrew M
author_facet Sankaran, Roshun
Sukul, Devraj
Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna
Gulseren, Baris
Engler, Tedi A
Arntson, Emily
Zlotnick, Hanna
Dimick, Justin B
Ryan, Andrew M
author_sort Sankaran, Roshun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hospital penalization in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) and subsequent changes in clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Regression discontinuity design applied to a retrospective cohort from inpatient Medicare claims. SETTING: 3238 acute care hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged from acute care hospitals between 23 July 2014 and 30 November 2016 and eligible for at least one targeted hospital acquired condition (n=15 470 334). INTERVENTION: Hospital receipt of a penalty in the first year of the HACRP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Episode level count of targeted hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes, 30 day readmissions, and 30 day mortality. RESULTS: Of 724 hospitals penalized under the HACRP in fiscal year 2015, 708 were represented in the study. Mean counts of hospital acquired conditions were 2.72 per 1000 episodes for penalized hospitals and 2.06 per 1000 episodes for non-penalized hospitals; 30 day readmissions were 14.4% and 14.0%, respectively, and 30 day mortality was 9.0% for both hospital groups. Penalized hospitals were more likely to be large, teaching institutions, and have a greater share of patients with low socioeconomic status than non-penalized hospitals. HACRP penalties were associated with a non-significant change of −0.16 hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes (95% confidence interval −0.53 to 0.20), −0.36 percentage points in 30 day readmission (−1.06 to 0.33), and −0.04 percentage points in 30 day mortality (−0.59 to 0.52). No clear patterns of clinical improvement were observed across hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Penalization was not associated with significant changes in rates of hospital acquired conditions, 30 day readmission, or 30 day mortality, and does not appear to drive meaningful clinical improvements. By disproportionately penalizing hospitals caring for more disadvantaged patients, the HACRP could exacerbate inequities in care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6607204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66072042019-07-18 Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study Sankaran, Roshun Sukul, Devraj Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna Gulseren, Baris Engler, Tedi A Arntson, Emily Zlotnick, Hanna Dimick, Justin B Ryan, Andrew M BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between hospital penalization in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) and subsequent changes in clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Regression discontinuity design applied to a retrospective cohort from inpatient Medicare claims. SETTING: 3238 acute care hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged from acute care hospitals between 23 July 2014 and 30 November 2016 and eligible for at least one targeted hospital acquired condition (n=15 470 334). INTERVENTION: Hospital receipt of a penalty in the first year of the HACRP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Episode level count of targeted hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes, 30 day readmissions, and 30 day mortality. RESULTS: Of 724 hospitals penalized under the HACRP in fiscal year 2015, 708 were represented in the study. Mean counts of hospital acquired conditions were 2.72 per 1000 episodes for penalized hospitals and 2.06 per 1000 episodes for non-penalized hospitals; 30 day readmissions were 14.4% and 14.0%, respectively, and 30 day mortality was 9.0% for both hospital groups. Penalized hospitals were more likely to be large, teaching institutions, and have a greater share of patients with low socioeconomic status than non-penalized hospitals. HACRP penalties were associated with a non-significant change of −0.16 hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes (95% confidence interval −0.53 to 0.20), −0.36 percentage points in 30 day readmission (−1.06 to 0.33), and −0.04 percentage points in 30 day mortality (−0.59 to 0.52). No clear patterns of clinical improvement were observed across hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Penalization was not associated with significant changes in rates of hospital acquired conditions, 30 day readmission, or 30 day mortality, and does not appear to drive meaningful clinical improvements. By disproportionately penalizing hospitals caring for more disadvantaged patients, the HACRP could exacerbate inequities in care. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2019-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6607204/ /pubmed/31270062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4109 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Sankaran, Roshun
Sukul, Devraj
Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna
Gulseren, Baris
Engler, Tedi A
Arntson, Emily
Zlotnick, Hanna
Dimick, Justin B
Ryan, Andrew M
Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study
title Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study
title_full Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study
title_short Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study
title_sort changes in hospital safety following penalties in the us hospital acquired condition reduction program: retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31270062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4109
work_keys_str_mv AT sankaranroshun changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sukuldevraj changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy
AT nuliyaluushapoorna changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gulserenbaris changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy
AT englertedia changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy
AT arntsonemily changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zlotnickhanna changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dimickjustinb changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ryanandrewm changesinhospitalsafetyfollowingpenaltiesintheushospitalacquiredconditionreductionprogramretrospectivecohortstudy