Cargando…
Systematic Analysis of Evidence and Sound Expert Assessment: Two Enablers of Evidence‐Based Decision‐Making in Health
This commentary discusses attributes, membership, and modus operandi of advisory committees in the health sector, taking examples of a few committees operating internationally. It concludes on the importance of transparency and legitimacy for the credibility of their outcomes.
Autores principales: | Kieny, Marie Paule, Moorthy, Vasee |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31565350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201800022 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Rationale for WHO's New Position Calling for Prompt Reporting and Public Disclosure of Interventional Clinical Trial Results
por: Moorthy, Vasee S., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Data sharing in public health emergencies: a call to researchers
por: Dye, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Practice–Research Partnerships and Mentoring to Foster Evidence-Based Decision Making
por: Brownson, Ross C.
Publicado: (2014) -
Translating Cochrane Reviews to Ensure that Healthcare Decision-Making is Informed by High-Quality Research Evidence
por: von Elm, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Best practices for sharing information through data platforms: establishing the principles
por: Moorthy, Vasee S, et al.
Publicado: (2016)