Cargando…

Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer

Clinical efficacy of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was compared. A total of 156 patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from July 2015 to January 2017 we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Zhongrui, Zhang, Bo, Chen, Yu, Lin, Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10394
_version_ 1783432087708106752
author Ye, Zhongrui
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Yu
Lin, Jiang
author_facet Ye, Zhongrui
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Yu
Lin, Jiang
author_sort Ye, Zhongrui
collection PubMed
description Clinical efficacy of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was compared. A total of 156 patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from July 2015 to January 2017 were selected as subjects. They were randomly divided into group A (n=74) and group B (n=82), in which group A was treated with single utility port VATS and group B was treated with three-port VATS. Perioperative indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, removal of drainage tube, lymph node dissection, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, postoperative pain and postoperative quality of life were observed. Expression levels of CRP and IL-6 in serum were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). There was no significant difference in the operation time, postoperative drainage volume, drainage tube removal time and lymph node dissection between groups A and B (P>0.05). Blood loss and hospitalization time in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). VAS scores at 1–3 days after operation in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). Levels of serum CRP and IL-6 at 1–7 days after operation in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). Incidence of complication in group A was not significantly different from that in group B (P>0.05). Overall quality of life scores of group A and B were significantly lower than the preoperative scores (P<0.001). Overall status score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P<0.001). Clinical efficacies of single utility port VATS and three-port VATS were similar. Single utility port VATS can reduce trauma during surgery, reduce stress response, relieve postoperative pain, and facilitate the recovery of postoperative quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6607390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66073902019-08-18 Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer Ye, Zhongrui Zhang, Bo Chen, Yu Lin, Jiang Oncol Lett Articles Clinical efficacy of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was compared. A total of 156 patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from July 2015 to January 2017 were selected as subjects. They were randomly divided into group A (n=74) and group B (n=82), in which group A was treated with single utility port VATS and group B was treated with three-port VATS. Perioperative indicators such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, removal of drainage tube, lymph node dissection, hospitalization time, postoperative complications, postoperative pain and postoperative quality of life were observed. Expression levels of CRP and IL-6 in serum were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). There was no significant difference in the operation time, postoperative drainage volume, drainage tube removal time and lymph node dissection between groups A and B (P>0.05). Blood loss and hospitalization time in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). VAS scores at 1–3 days after operation in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). Levels of serum CRP and IL-6 at 1–7 days after operation in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P<0.001). Incidence of complication in group A was not significantly different from that in group B (P>0.05). Overall quality of life scores of group A and B were significantly lower than the preoperative scores (P<0.001). Overall status score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P<0.001). Clinical efficacies of single utility port VATS and three-port VATS were similar. Single utility port VATS can reduce trauma during surgery, reduce stress response, relieve postoperative pain, and facilitate the recovery of postoperative quality of life. D.A. Spandidos 2019-08 2019-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6607390/ /pubmed/31423191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10394 Text en Copyright: © Ye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Ye, Zhongrui
Zhang, Bo
Chen, Yu
Lin, Jiang
Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer
title Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer
title_full Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer
title_short Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer
title_sort comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (vats) and three-port vats for non-small cell lung cancer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10394
work_keys_str_mv AT yezhongrui comparisonofsingleutilityportvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsandthreeportvatsfornonsmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangbo comparisonofsingleutilityportvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsandthreeportvatsfornonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chenyu comparisonofsingleutilityportvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsandthreeportvatsfornonsmallcelllungcancer
AT linjiang comparisonofsingleutilityportvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryvatsandthreeportvatsfornonsmallcelllungcancer