Cargando…

The Epidemiology of Zoonotic Brucellosis in Bahr el Ghazal Region of South Sudan

Background: In this study, we focused on three zoonotic brucellosis risk groups; abattoir workers, febrile cases at Wau hospital and cattle herders, in Bahr el Ghazal region, South Sudan. Competitive c-ELISA was used to detect anti-Brucella antibodies in 725 individuals between December 2015 and May...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madut, Nuol Aywel, Muleme, James, Kankya, Clovice, Nasinyama, George William, Muma, John Bwalya, Godfroid, Jacques, Jubara, Ambrose Samuel, Muwonge, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00156
_version_ 1783432095487492096
author Madut, Nuol Aywel
Muleme, James
Kankya, Clovice
Nasinyama, George William
Muma, John Bwalya
Godfroid, Jacques
Jubara, Ambrose Samuel
Muwonge, Adrian
author_facet Madut, Nuol Aywel
Muleme, James
Kankya, Clovice
Nasinyama, George William
Muma, John Bwalya
Godfroid, Jacques
Jubara, Ambrose Samuel
Muwonge, Adrian
author_sort Madut, Nuol Aywel
collection PubMed
description Background: In this study, we focused on three zoonotic brucellosis risk groups; abattoir workers, febrile cases at Wau hospital and cattle herders, in Bahr el Ghazal region, South Sudan. Competitive c-ELISA was used to detect anti-Brucella antibodies in 725 individuals between December 2015 and May 2016. In addition, questionnaire metadata, focus group discussions and key informant interviews were used to characterize the epidemiology of zoonotic brucellosis in this region. Results: Overall, we estimate 27.2 % (95% CI = 23.9–30.6) brucellosis sero-prevalence; 32.1% (95% CI = 26.2–38.4), 23.0% (95% CI = 19.1–27.4) and 34.6% (95% CI = 24.4–46.3) among abattoir workers, febrile cases, and herders, respectively. Marital status (Single, OR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.36–0.91, P = 0.02) and ethnicity (Kerash OR = 6.01, 95%CI: 1.97–21.10, P = 0.003 and Balanda, OR = 3.78, 95%CI: 1.42–12.02, P = 0.01) were associated with brucellosis. While gender and ethnicity were important factors for general awareness of zoonotic diseases. Highly ranked occupations at risk included veterinarian, butchers and milk handlers. We also identified covariate patterns for clinical diagnostics and public health interventions. Conclusion: We report the highest sero-prevalence of zoonotic brucellosis in three risk groups in the East African region. All this is not only occurring in a population with limited awareness that brucellosis is a zoonotic disease but also where one in nine health workers tested was sero-positive. We identified social demographic associations with brucellosis, however, the qualitative analysis suggests these are more complex and nuanced. Therefore, future studies could benefit from the use of the mixed methods approach to add extensiveness and depth to our understanding of zoonotic disease drivers, in order to implement mitigating measures such as cattle vaccination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6607442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66074422019-07-11 The Epidemiology of Zoonotic Brucellosis in Bahr el Ghazal Region of South Sudan Madut, Nuol Aywel Muleme, James Kankya, Clovice Nasinyama, George William Muma, John Bwalya Godfroid, Jacques Jubara, Ambrose Samuel Muwonge, Adrian Front Public Health Public Health Background: In this study, we focused on three zoonotic brucellosis risk groups; abattoir workers, febrile cases at Wau hospital and cattle herders, in Bahr el Ghazal region, South Sudan. Competitive c-ELISA was used to detect anti-Brucella antibodies in 725 individuals between December 2015 and May 2016. In addition, questionnaire metadata, focus group discussions and key informant interviews were used to characterize the epidemiology of zoonotic brucellosis in this region. Results: Overall, we estimate 27.2 % (95% CI = 23.9–30.6) brucellosis sero-prevalence; 32.1% (95% CI = 26.2–38.4), 23.0% (95% CI = 19.1–27.4) and 34.6% (95% CI = 24.4–46.3) among abattoir workers, febrile cases, and herders, respectively. Marital status (Single, OR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.36–0.91, P = 0.02) and ethnicity (Kerash OR = 6.01, 95%CI: 1.97–21.10, P = 0.003 and Balanda, OR = 3.78, 95%CI: 1.42–12.02, P = 0.01) were associated with brucellosis. While gender and ethnicity were important factors for general awareness of zoonotic diseases. Highly ranked occupations at risk included veterinarian, butchers and milk handlers. We also identified covariate patterns for clinical diagnostics and public health interventions. Conclusion: We report the highest sero-prevalence of zoonotic brucellosis in three risk groups in the East African region. All this is not only occurring in a population with limited awareness that brucellosis is a zoonotic disease but also where one in nine health workers tested was sero-positive. We identified social demographic associations with brucellosis, however, the qualitative analysis suggests these are more complex and nuanced. Therefore, future studies could benefit from the use of the mixed methods approach to add extensiveness and depth to our understanding of zoonotic disease drivers, in order to implement mitigating measures such as cattle vaccination. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6607442/ /pubmed/31297365 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00156 Text en Copyright © 2019 Madut, Muleme, Kankya, Nasinyama, Muma, Godfroid, Jubara and Muwonge. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Madut, Nuol Aywel
Muleme, James
Kankya, Clovice
Nasinyama, George William
Muma, John Bwalya
Godfroid, Jacques
Jubara, Ambrose Samuel
Muwonge, Adrian
The Epidemiology of Zoonotic Brucellosis in Bahr el Ghazal Region of South Sudan
title The Epidemiology of Zoonotic Brucellosis in Bahr el Ghazal Region of South Sudan
title_full The Epidemiology of Zoonotic Brucellosis in Bahr el Ghazal Region of South Sudan
title_fullStr The Epidemiology of Zoonotic Brucellosis in Bahr el Ghazal Region of South Sudan
title_full_unstemmed The Epidemiology of Zoonotic Brucellosis in Bahr el Ghazal Region of South Sudan
title_short The Epidemiology of Zoonotic Brucellosis in Bahr el Ghazal Region of South Sudan
title_sort epidemiology of zoonotic brucellosis in bahr el ghazal region of south sudan
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00156
work_keys_str_mv AT madutnuolaywel theepidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT mulemejames theepidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT kankyaclovice theepidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT nasinyamageorgewilliam theepidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT mumajohnbwalya theepidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT godfroidjacques theepidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT jubaraambrosesamuel theepidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT muwongeadrian theepidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT madutnuolaywel epidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT mulemejames epidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT kankyaclovice epidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT nasinyamageorgewilliam epidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT mumajohnbwalya epidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT godfroidjacques epidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT jubaraambrosesamuel epidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan
AT muwongeadrian epidemiologyofzoonoticbrucellosisinbahrelghazalregionofsouthsudan