Cargando…
Treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures by external fixation combined with limited internal fixation versus simple external fixation: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The treatment of open tibial shaft fractures is challenging. External fixation (EF) is comparatively safe in treating these open injuries, meanwhile it has the advantages of easy application, minimal additional disruption, and convenient subsequent soft tissue repair. Nevertheless, its a...
Autores principales: | Hao, Zi-Chen, Xia, Yan, Xia, De-Meng, Zhang, Yun-Tong, Xu, Shuo-Gui |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31266474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2679-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
External fixation as a primary and definitive treatment for tibial diaphyseal fractures
por: Beltsios, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Retrospective clinical outcomes in the definitive treatment of high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures using hexapod external fixator versus monolateral external fixator
por: Liu, Yanshi, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Bicondylar tibial fractures: Internal or external fixation?
por: Kumar, Gunasekaran, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
A meta-analysis of external fixator versus intramedullary nails for open tibial fracture fixation
por: Xu, Xian, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
External Fixation combined with Limited Internal Fixation versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Treating Ruedi-Allgower Type III Pilon Fractures
por: Guo, Yongzhi, et al.
Publicado: (2015)