Cargando…

Validating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument

BACKGROUND: How health care professionals address health literacy as part of the provider-client relationship is important for prevention and promoting self-management and symptom management. Research usually focuses on patients' health literacy and fails to examine provider practices, thus lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Squires, Allison P., Yin, H. Shonna, Jones, Simon A., Greenberg, Sherry A., Moore, Ronnie, Cortes, Tara A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SLACK Incorporated 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20171030-01
_version_ 1783432144884858880
author Squires, Allison P.
Yin, H. Shonna
Jones, Simon A.
Greenberg, Sherry A.
Moore, Ronnie
Cortes, Tara A.
author_facet Squires, Allison P.
Yin, H. Shonna
Jones, Simon A.
Greenberg, Sherry A.
Moore, Ronnie
Cortes, Tara A.
author_sort Squires, Allison P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: How health care professionals address health literacy as part of the provider-client relationship is important for prevention and promoting self-management and symptom management. Research usually focuses on patients' health literacy and fails to examine provider practices, thus leaving a gap in the literature and patient outcomes analyses. OBJECTIVE: The study tested the reliability and validity of a series of questions developed to evaluate health care provider health literacy promotion practices on an interprofessional sample. METHODS: This exploratory cross-sectional study took place between 2013 and 2015. Participants included graduate level health professions students from nursing, midwifery, medicine, pharmacy, and social work. Exploratory factor analyses with varimax rotation examined the reliability and validity of the instrument as a measure of health literacy promotion practices. KEY RESULTS: Of the participants in the programs, 198 completed the health literacy questions in the online survey. Exploratory factor analysis showed that questions loaded on two factors connected with either individual or organizational characteristics that facilitated health literacy promotion practices. The Cronbach's alpha for the instrument was 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: This study helped determine the reliability and validity of the items as measures of providers' health literacy practices. Future research will help to further establish the stability of the instrument as a measure and increase its potential reliability when linking provider practices to health literacy sensitive client outcomes. Testing the instrument separately and concurrently with each health profession is recommended until instrument stability across professional roles has been established. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(4):e239–e246.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We sought to develop a survey instrument people could use to assess how health care providers help patients understand their health better. After getting responses from 198 health care providers, we ran statistical tests to check the quality of the questions for measuring provider practices. We found the questions were good at evaluating provider practices around promoting patient understanding of health issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6607787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SLACK Incorporated
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66077872019-07-10 Validating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument Squires, Allison P. Yin, H. Shonna Jones, Simon A. Greenberg, Sherry A. Moore, Ronnie Cortes, Tara A. Health Lit Res Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: How health care professionals address health literacy as part of the provider-client relationship is important for prevention and promoting self-management and symptom management. Research usually focuses on patients' health literacy and fails to examine provider practices, thus leaving a gap in the literature and patient outcomes analyses. OBJECTIVE: The study tested the reliability and validity of a series of questions developed to evaluate health care provider health literacy promotion practices on an interprofessional sample. METHODS: This exploratory cross-sectional study took place between 2013 and 2015. Participants included graduate level health professions students from nursing, midwifery, medicine, pharmacy, and social work. Exploratory factor analyses with varimax rotation examined the reliability and validity of the instrument as a measure of health literacy promotion practices. KEY RESULTS: Of the participants in the programs, 198 completed the health literacy questions in the online survey. Exploratory factor analysis showed that questions loaded on two factors connected with either individual or organizational characteristics that facilitated health literacy promotion practices. The Cronbach's alpha for the instrument was 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: This study helped determine the reliability and validity of the items as measures of providers' health literacy practices. Future research will help to further establish the stability of the instrument as a measure and increase its potential reliability when linking provider practices to health literacy sensitive client outcomes. Testing the instrument separately and concurrently with each health profession is recommended until instrument stability across professional roles has been established. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(4):e239–e246.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We sought to develop a survey instrument people could use to assess how health care providers help patients understand their health better. After getting responses from 198 health care providers, we ran statistical tests to check the quality of the questions for measuring provider practices. We found the questions were good at evaluating provider practices around promoting patient understanding of health issues. SLACK Incorporated 2017-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6607787/ /pubmed/31294269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20171030-01 Text en © 2017 Squires, Yin, Jones, et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article, for any purpose, even commercially, provided the author is attributed and is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work.
spellingShingle Original Research
Squires, Allison P.
Yin, H. Shonna
Jones, Simon A.
Greenberg, Sherry A.
Moore, Ronnie
Cortes, Tara A.
Validating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument
title Validating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument
title_full Validating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument
title_fullStr Validating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument
title_full_unstemmed Validating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument
title_short Validating the Health Literacy Promotion Practices Assessment Instrument
title_sort validating the health literacy promotion practices assessment instrument
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20171030-01
work_keys_str_mv AT squiresallisonp validatingthehealthliteracypromotionpracticesassessmentinstrument
AT yinhshonna validatingthehealthliteracypromotionpracticesassessmentinstrument
AT jonessimona validatingthehealthliteracypromotionpracticesassessmentinstrument
AT greenbergsherrya validatingthehealthliteracypromotionpracticesassessmentinstrument
AT mooreronnie validatingthehealthliteracypromotionpracticesassessmentinstrument
AT cortestaraa validatingthehealthliteracypromotionpracticesassessmentinstrument