Cargando…
Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record
Limited health literacy is associated with worse health outcomes. It is standard practice in many primary care clinics to provide patients with written patient education materials (PEM), which often come directly from an electronic health record (EHR). We compared the health literacy of patients in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SLACK Incorporated
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170918-01 |
_version_ | 1783432145382932480 |
---|---|
author | Imoisili, Omoye E. Levinsohn, Erik Pan, Cassie Howell, Benjamin A. Streiter, Shoshana Rosenbaum, Julie R. |
author_facet | Imoisili, Omoye E. Levinsohn, Erik Pan, Cassie Howell, Benjamin A. Streiter, Shoshana Rosenbaum, Julie R. |
author_sort | Imoisili, Omoye E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Limited health literacy is associated with worse health outcomes. It is standard practice in many primary care clinics to provide patients with written patient education materials (PEM), which often come directly from an electronic health record (EHR). We compared the health literacy of patients in a primary care residency clinic with EHR PEM readability by grade level. We assessed health literacy using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF), and determined grade level readability for the PEM distributed for the five most common clinical diagnoses using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid metrics. Among 175 participants, health literacy was ≥9th grade for 76 patients (43.4%), 7th to 8th grade for 66 patients (37.7%), and ≤6th grade for 30 patients (17.1%). Average standard PEM readability by SMOG was grade 9.2 and easy-to-read PEM readability was grade 6.8. These findings suggest a discrepancy between the health literacy of most patients who were surveyed and standard PEM readability. Despite national guidelines encouraging clinicians to provide PEM at an appropriate reading level, our results indicate that PEM from EHR may not be readable for many patients. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(4):e203–e207.] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6607789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SLACK Incorporated |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66077892019-07-10 Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record Imoisili, Omoye E. Levinsohn, Erik Pan, Cassie Howell, Benjamin A. Streiter, Shoshana Rosenbaum, Julie R. Health Lit Res Pract Brief Report Limited health literacy is associated with worse health outcomes. It is standard practice in many primary care clinics to provide patients with written patient education materials (PEM), which often come directly from an electronic health record (EHR). We compared the health literacy of patients in a primary care residency clinic with EHR PEM readability by grade level. We assessed health literacy using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF), and determined grade level readability for the PEM distributed for the five most common clinical diagnoses using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid metrics. Among 175 participants, health literacy was ≥9th grade for 76 patients (43.4%), 7th to 8th grade for 66 patients (37.7%), and ≤6th grade for 30 patients (17.1%). Average standard PEM readability by SMOG was grade 9.2 and easy-to-read PEM readability was grade 6.8. These findings suggest a discrepancy between the health literacy of most patients who were surveyed and standard PEM readability. Despite national guidelines encouraging clinicians to provide PEM at an appropriate reading level, our results indicate that PEM from EHR may not be readable for many patients. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(4):e203–e207.] SLACK Incorporated 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6607789/ /pubmed/31294265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170918-01 Text en © 2017 Imoisili, Levinsohn, Pan, et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article non-commercially, provided the author is attributed and the new work is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Imoisili, Omoye E. Levinsohn, Erik Pan, Cassie Howell, Benjamin A. Streiter, Shoshana Rosenbaum, Julie R. Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record |
title | Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record |
title_full | Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record |
title_fullStr | Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record |
title_short | Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record |
title_sort | discrepancy between patient health literacy levels and readability of patient education materials from an electronic health record |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170918-01 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imoisiliomoyee discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord AT levinsohnerik discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord AT pancassie discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord AT howellbenjamina discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord AT streitershoshana discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord AT rosenbaumjulier discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord |