Cargando…

Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record

Limited health literacy is associated with worse health outcomes. It is standard practice in many primary care clinics to provide patients with written patient education materials (PEM), which often come directly from an electronic health record (EHR). We compared the health literacy of patients in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imoisili, Omoye E., Levinsohn, Erik, Pan, Cassie, Howell, Benjamin A., Streiter, Shoshana, Rosenbaum, Julie R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SLACK Incorporated 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294265
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170918-01
_version_ 1783432145382932480
author Imoisili, Omoye E.
Levinsohn, Erik
Pan, Cassie
Howell, Benjamin A.
Streiter, Shoshana
Rosenbaum, Julie R.
author_facet Imoisili, Omoye E.
Levinsohn, Erik
Pan, Cassie
Howell, Benjamin A.
Streiter, Shoshana
Rosenbaum, Julie R.
author_sort Imoisili, Omoye E.
collection PubMed
description Limited health literacy is associated with worse health outcomes. It is standard practice in many primary care clinics to provide patients with written patient education materials (PEM), which often come directly from an electronic health record (EHR). We compared the health literacy of patients in a primary care residency clinic with EHR PEM readability by grade level. We assessed health literacy using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF), and determined grade level readability for the PEM distributed for the five most common clinical diagnoses using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid metrics. Among 175 participants, health literacy was ≥9th grade for 76 patients (43.4%), 7th to 8th grade for 66 patients (37.7%), and ≤6th grade for 30 patients (17.1%). Average standard PEM readability by SMOG was grade 9.2 and easy-to-read PEM readability was grade 6.8. These findings suggest a discrepancy between the health literacy of most patients who were surveyed and standard PEM readability. Despite national guidelines encouraging clinicians to provide PEM at an appropriate reading level, our results indicate that PEM from EHR may not be readable for many patients. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(4):e203–e207.]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6607789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SLACK Incorporated
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66077892019-07-10 Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record Imoisili, Omoye E. Levinsohn, Erik Pan, Cassie Howell, Benjamin A. Streiter, Shoshana Rosenbaum, Julie R. Health Lit Res Pract Brief Report Limited health literacy is associated with worse health outcomes. It is standard practice in many primary care clinics to provide patients with written patient education materials (PEM), which often come directly from an electronic health record (EHR). We compared the health literacy of patients in a primary care residency clinic with EHR PEM readability by grade level. We assessed health literacy using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF), and determined grade level readability for the PEM distributed for the five most common clinical diagnoses using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Flesch-Kincaid metrics. Among 175 participants, health literacy was ≥9th grade for 76 patients (43.4%), 7th to 8th grade for 66 patients (37.7%), and ≤6th grade for 30 patients (17.1%). Average standard PEM readability by SMOG was grade 9.2 and easy-to-read PEM readability was grade 6.8. These findings suggest a discrepancy between the health literacy of most patients who were surveyed and standard PEM readability. Despite national guidelines encouraging clinicians to provide PEM at an appropriate reading level, our results indicate that PEM from EHR may not be readable for many patients. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(4):e203–e207.] SLACK Incorporated 2017-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6607789/ /pubmed/31294265 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170918-01 Text en © 2017 Imoisili, Levinsohn, Pan, et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article non-commercially, provided the author is attributed and the new work is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Imoisili, Omoye E.
Levinsohn, Erik
Pan, Cassie
Howell, Benjamin A.
Streiter, Shoshana
Rosenbaum, Julie R.
Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record
title Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record
title_full Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record
title_fullStr Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record
title_short Discrepancy Between Patient Health Literacy Levels and Readability of Patient Education Materials from an Electronic Health Record
title_sort discrepancy between patient health literacy levels and readability of patient education materials from an electronic health record
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294265
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170918-01
work_keys_str_mv AT imoisiliomoyee discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord
AT levinsohnerik discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord
AT pancassie discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord
AT howellbenjamina discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord
AT streitershoshana discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord
AT rosenbaumjulier discrepancybetweenpatienthealthliteracylevelsandreadabilityofpatienteducationmaterialsfromanelectronichealthrecord