Cargando…

Health Literacy in a Social Context: Review of Quantitative Evidence

BACKGROUND: Conceptual literature has consistently noted that health literacy exists within a social context. This review examined how the intersection of social context and health literacy has been operationalized in quantitative, empirical research. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sentell, Tetine, Pitt, Ruth, Buchthal, Opal Vanessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SLACK Incorporated 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170427-01
_version_ 1783432159253495808
author Sentell, Tetine
Pitt, Ruth
Buchthal, Opal Vanessa
author_facet Sentell, Tetine
Pitt, Ruth
Buchthal, Opal Vanessa
author_sort Sentell, Tetine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conceptual literature has consistently noted that health literacy exists within a social context. This review examined how the intersection of social context and health literacy has been operationalized in quantitative, empirical research. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched seven databases, including PubMed and CINAHL (The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), using a range of potentially relevant keywords, and we hand-searched bibliographies. Inclusion criteria were quantitative studies of any design in which measurement of health literacy and measurement of social context intersected. We identified 1,052 unduplicated articles; 34 met inclusion criteria. KEY RESULTS: We found three distinct perspectives on the intersection between health literacy and social context. Most common (n = 23) were studies measuring an association between individual health literacy and individual social capital, social support, or social engagement, particularly whether social support varied by health literacy and/or if this relationship mediated health outcomes. Another group of studies (n = 6) took the perspective that being health literate by definition included social context, including access to and/or use of social support as a domain in individual health literacy assessment. Five studies considered the social context of health literacy as an independent property measured beyond the individual level; two measured community-level health literacy and three measured health literacy capacity/concordance in caregiving dyads. The studies showed significant definitional and measurement complexity and overlap. In the most dramatic example, a similar question was used across various studies to measure (1) health literacy, (2) a social support domain in health literacy, (3) social support, and (4) a study outcome distinct from, but associated with, health literacy. Potential useful methods, such as social network analyses, were missing from the literature. DISCUSSION: Existing quantitative research on health literacy in a social context supports more attention to this topic. This review quantified evidence, revealed gaps, noted limitations, and identified important questions for future research. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(2):e41–e70.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study systemically compiles existing quantitative empirical research (34 articles) focusing on the intersection of health literacy in the social context. We find considerable measurement complexity in the current body of work on this topic and identify three distinct perspectives that researchers have taken while considering this topic. This information will be useful for future development of this important research area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6607851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SLACK Incorporated
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66078512019-07-10 Health Literacy in a Social Context: Review of Quantitative Evidence Sentell, Tetine Pitt, Ruth Buchthal, Opal Vanessa Health Lit Res Pract Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Conceptual literature has consistently noted that health literacy exists within a social context. This review examined how the intersection of social context and health literacy has been operationalized in quantitative, empirical research. METHODS: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched seven databases, including PubMed and CINAHL (The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), using a range of potentially relevant keywords, and we hand-searched bibliographies. Inclusion criteria were quantitative studies of any design in which measurement of health literacy and measurement of social context intersected. We identified 1,052 unduplicated articles; 34 met inclusion criteria. KEY RESULTS: We found three distinct perspectives on the intersection between health literacy and social context. Most common (n = 23) were studies measuring an association between individual health literacy and individual social capital, social support, or social engagement, particularly whether social support varied by health literacy and/or if this relationship mediated health outcomes. Another group of studies (n = 6) took the perspective that being health literate by definition included social context, including access to and/or use of social support as a domain in individual health literacy assessment. Five studies considered the social context of health literacy as an independent property measured beyond the individual level; two measured community-level health literacy and three measured health literacy capacity/concordance in caregiving dyads. The studies showed significant definitional and measurement complexity and overlap. In the most dramatic example, a similar question was used across various studies to measure (1) health literacy, (2) a social support domain in health literacy, (3) social support, and (4) a study outcome distinct from, but associated with, health literacy. Potential useful methods, such as social network analyses, were missing from the literature. DISCUSSION: Existing quantitative research on health literacy in a social context supports more attention to this topic. This review quantified evidence, revealed gaps, noted limitations, and identified important questions for future research. [Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2017;1(2):e41–e70.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study systemically compiles existing quantitative empirical research (34 articles) focusing on the intersection of health literacy in the social context. We find considerable measurement complexity in the current body of work on this topic and identify three distinct perspectives that researchers have taken while considering this topic. This information will be useful for future development of this important research area. SLACK Incorporated 2017-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6607851/ /pubmed/31294251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170427-01 Text en © 2017 Sentell, Pitt, Buchthal This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article non-commercially, provided the author is attributed and the new work is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Sentell, Tetine
Pitt, Ruth
Buchthal, Opal Vanessa
Health Literacy in a Social Context: Review of Quantitative Evidence
title Health Literacy in a Social Context: Review of Quantitative Evidence
title_full Health Literacy in a Social Context: Review of Quantitative Evidence
title_fullStr Health Literacy in a Social Context: Review of Quantitative Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Health Literacy in a Social Context: Review of Quantitative Evidence
title_short Health Literacy in a Social Context: Review of Quantitative Evidence
title_sort health literacy in a social context: review of quantitative evidence
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6607851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20170427-01
work_keys_str_mv AT sentelltetine healthliteracyinasocialcontextreviewofquantitativeevidence
AT pittruth healthliteracyinasocialcontextreviewofquantitativeevidence
AT buchthalopalvanessa healthliteracyinasocialcontextreviewofquantitativeevidence