Cargando…

Assessing the Print Communication and Technology Attributes of an Academic Medical Center

BACKGROUND: Historically, health literacy has been viewed as the patient's problem; however, it is now accepted that the responsibility for improving health literacy lies with the health care professionals and systems. An Institute of Medicine report outlines the health literacy attributes, suc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leonard, Kelsey, Oelschlegel, Sandy, Tester, Emily, Russomanno, Jennifer, Heidel, Robert Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SLACK Incorporated 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6608911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20180108-01
_version_ 1783432219483701248
author Leonard, Kelsey
Oelschlegel, Sandy
Tester, Emily
Russomanno, Jennifer
Heidel, Robert Eric
author_facet Leonard, Kelsey
Oelschlegel, Sandy
Tester, Emily
Russomanno, Jennifer
Heidel, Robert Eric
author_sort Leonard, Kelsey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Historically, health literacy has been viewed as the patient's problem; however, it is now accepted that the responsibility for improving health literacy lies with the health care professionals and systems. An Institute of Medicine report outlines the health literacy attributes, such as printed patient education and technology, which both play a role in patient decision-making and engaging them in their health care. Research suggests that patients who are engaged in their health care have improved health outcomes. For health care organizations to accommodate the needs of all patients, it is imperative that they determine the current organizational state and discover opportunities for improvement. METHODS: The Health Literacy Environment of Hospitals and Health Centers (HLEHHC) Print Communication Rating and Technology Rating Tool were used to measure the internal aspects of organizational health literacy at The University of Tennessee Medical Center (UTMC). Included in the print assessment were the 150 most distributed patient education handouts. Researchers also used the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool to assess print material. Technology was assessed using UTMC's website as the authoritative source. KEY RESULTS: The HLEHHC was useful for assessing print material and technology. Reviewing and reporting the data question-by-question revealed more granular, actionable information on where there are opportunities to improve the health care environment for all patients. This analysis resulted in proposing actions based on best practices that UTMC could implement in the coming year. The process is replicable in other settings. IMPLICATIONS: Responsibility for improving informed medical decision-making lies with health care organizations. Low health literacy influences the effectiveness of print patient education and technology in informing patients about their health. Assessing these aspects of the health care organization as part of quality improvement provides necessary data for improvements. The Health Literacy Environment of Hospital and Health Centers was a useful tool to measure characteristics of print and technology. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2018;2(1):e26–e34.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: A task force at an academic medical center assessed the health literacy attributes of their organization. Researchers assessed print patient education and patient-related technology. The researchers found areas for improvements to make health information easier to understand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6608911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SLACK Incorporated
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66089112019-07-10 Assessing the Print Communication and Technology Attributes of an Academic Medical Center Leonard, Kelsey Oelschlegel, Sandy Tester, Emily Russomanno, Jennifer Heidel, Robert Eric Health Lit Res Pract Best Practice BACKGROUND: Historically, health literacy has been viewed as the patient's problem; however, it is now accepted that the responsibility for improving health literacy lies with the health care professionals and systems. An Institute of Medicine report outlines the health literacy attributes, such as printed patient education and technology, which both play a role in patient decision-making and engaging them in their health care. Research suggests that patients who are engaged in their health care have improved health outcomes. For health care organizations to accommodate the needs of all patients, it is imperative that they determine the current organizational state and discover opportunities for improvement. METHODS: The Health Literacy Environment of Hospitals and Health Centers (HLEHHC) Print Communication Rating and Technology Rating Tool were used to measure the internal aspects of organizational health literacy at The University of Tennessee Medical Center (UTMC). Included in the print assessment were the 150 most distributed patient education handouts. Researchers also used the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool to assess print material. Technology was assessed using UTMC's website as the authoritative source. KEY RESULTS: The HLEHHC was useful for assessing print material and technology. Reviewing and reporting the data question-by-question revealed more granular, actionable information on where there are opportunities to improve the health care environment for all patients. This analysis resulted in proposing actions based on best practices that UTMC could implement in the coming year. The process is replicable in other settings. IMPLICATIONS: Responsibility for improving informed medical decision-making lies with health care organizations. Low health literacy influences the effectiveness of print patient education and technology in informing patients about their health. Assessing these aspects of the health care organization as part of quality improvement provides necessary data for improvements. The Health Literacy Environment of Hospital and Health Centers was a useful tool to measure characteristics of print and technology. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2018;2(1):e26–e34.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: A task force at an academic medical center assessed the health literacy attributes of their organization. Researchers assessed print patient education and patient-related technology. The researchers found areas for improvements to make health information easier to understand. SLACK Incorporated 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6608911/ /pubmed/31294274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20180108-01 Text en © 2018 Leonard, Oelschlegel, Tester, et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license allows users to copy and distribute, to remix, transform, and build upon the article non-commercially, provided the author is attributed and the new work is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Best Practice
Leonard, Kelsey
Oelschlegel, Sandy
Tester, Emily
Russomanno, Jennifer
Heidel, Robert Eric
Assessing the Print Communication and Technology Attributes of an Academic Medical Center
title Assessing the Print Communication and Technology Attributes of an Academic Medical Center
title_full Assessing the Print Communication and Technology Attributes of an Academic Medical Center
title_fullStr Assessing the Print Communication and Technology Attributes of an Academic Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Print Communication and Technology Attributes of an Academic Medical Center
title_short Assessing the Print Communication and Technology Attributes of an Academic Medical Center
title_sort assessing the print communication and technology attributes of an academic medical center
topic Best Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6608911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31294274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20180108-01
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardkelsey assessingtheprintcommunicationandtechnologyattributesofanacademicmedicalcenter
AT oelschlegelsandy assessingtheprintcommunicationandtechnologyattributesofanacademicmedicalcenter
AT testeremily assessingtheprintcommunicationandtechnologyattributesofanacademicmedicalcenter
AT russomannojennifer assessingtheprintcommunicationandtechnologyattributesofanacademicmedicalcenter
AT heidelroberteric assessingtheprintcommunicationandtechnologyattributesofanacademicmedicalcenter