Cargando…

Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To summarise the definitions and combinations of codes used to identify outcomes of anxiety, depression, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction (including mild cognitive dysfunction and dementia), sexual dysfunction, pain, sleep disorders, and fatal and non-fatal self-harm in studies using elect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carreira, Helena, Williams, Rachael, Strongman, Helen, Bhaskaran, Krishnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31270119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029227
_version_ 1783432260870995968
author Carreira, Helena
Williams, Rachael
Strongman, Helen
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
author_facet Carreira, Helena
Williams, Rachael
Strongman, Helen
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
author_sort Carreira, Helena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To summarise the definitions and combinations of codes used to identify outcomes of anxiety, depression, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction (including mild cognitive dysfunction and dementia), sexual dysfunction, pain, sleep disorders, and fatal and non-fatal self-harm in studies using electronic health records from primary care databases in the UK. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and lists of publications of the main primary care databases in the UK. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included data from a UK primary care database and studied outcome(s) of interest. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We abstracted information on the outcomes definition and codelists. When necessary, authors were contacted to request codelists. RESULTS: 120 studies were eligible. Codelists were available for 17/42 studies of depression; 21/41 studies of fatal and non-fatal self-harm; 17/27 studies of dementia/cognitive dysfunction; 5/12 studies of anxiety; 4/8 studies of pain; 3/6 studies of fatigue and sexual dysfunction; 1/2 studies of sleep disorders. Depression was most often defined using codes for diagnoses (37/42 studies) and/or antidepressants prescriptions (21/42 studies); six studies reported including symptoms in their definition. Anxiety was defined with codes for diagnoses (12/12 studies); four studies also reported including symptoms. Fatal self-harm was ascertained in primary care data linked to the Office for National Statistics mortality database in nine studies. Most studies of cognitive dysfunction included Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular and frontotemporal dementia. Fatigue definitions varied little, including chronic fatigue syndrome, neurasthenia and postviral fatigue syndrome. All studies of sexual dysfunction focused on male conditions, principally erectile dysfunction. Sleep disorders included insomnia and hypersomnia. There was substantial variability in the codelists; validation was carried out i21/120 studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for standardised definitions and validated list of codes to assess mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6609128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66091282019-07-19 Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review Carreira, Helena Williams, Rachael Strongman, Helen Bhaskaran, Krishnan BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: To summarise the definitions and combinations of codes used to identify outcomes of anxiety, depression, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction (including mild cognitive dysfunction and dementia), sexual dysfunction, pain, sleep disorders, and fatal and non-fatal self-harm in studies using electronic health records from primary care databases in the UK. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and lists of publications of the main primary care databases in the UK. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included data from a UK primary care database and studied outcome(s) of interest. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We abstracted information on the outcomes definition and codelists. When necessary, authors were contacted to request codelists. RESULTS: 120 studies were eligible. Codelists were available for 17/42 studies of depression; 21/41 studies of fatal and non-fatal self-harm; 17/27 studies of dementia/cognitive dysfunction; 5/12 studies of anxiety; 4/8 studies of pain; 3/6 studies of fatigue and sexual dysfunction; 1/2 studies of sleep disorders. Depression was most often defined using codes for diagnoses (37/42 studies) and/or antidepressants prescriptions (21/42 studies); six studies reported including symptoms in their definition. Anxiety was defined with codes for diagnoses (12/12 studies); four studies also reported including symptoms. Fatal self-harm was ascertained in primary care data linked to the Office for National Statistics mortality database in nine studies. Most studies of cognitive dysfunction included Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular and frontotemporal dementia. Fatigue definitions varied little, including chronic fatigue syndrome, neurasthenia and postviral fatigue syndrome. All studies of sexual dysfunction focused on male conditions, principally erectile dysfunction. Sleep disorders included insomnia and hypersomnia. There was substantial variability in the codelists; validation was carried out i21/120 studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for standardised definitions and validated list of codes to assess mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6609128/ /pubmed/31270119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029227 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Carreira, Helena
Williams, Rachael
Strongman, Helen
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review
title Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review
title_full Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review
title_fullStr Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review
title_short Identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the UK: a systematic review
title_sort identification of mental health and quality of life outcomes in primary care databases in the uk: a systematic review
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31270119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029227
work_keys_str_mv AT carreirahelena identificationofmentalhealthandqualityoflifeoutcomesinprimarycaredatabasesintheukasystematicreview
AT williamsrachael identificationofmentalhealthandqualityoflifeoutcomesinprimarycaredatabasesintheukasystematicreview
AT strongmanhelen identificationofmentalhealthandqualityoflifeoutcomesinprimarycaredatabasesintheukasystematicreview
AT bhaskarankrishnan identificationofmentalhealthandqualityoflifeoutcomesinprimarycaredatabasesintheukasystematicreview