Cargando…

Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of real-world outcome data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to assess the association of choice of oral P2Y12-receptor inhibitor with c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnamurthy, Arvindra, Keeble, Claire, Anderson, Michelle, Somers, Kathryn, Burton-Wood, Natalie, Harland, Charlotte, Baxter, Paul, McLenachan, Jim, Blaxill, Jonathan, Blackman, Daniel J, Malkin, Christopher, Wheatcroft, Stephen, Greenwood, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31328001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000951
_version_ 1783432263428472832
author Krishnamurthy, Arvindra
Keeble, Claire
Anderson, Michelle
Somers, Kathryn
Burton-Wood, Natalie
Harland, Charlotte
Baxter, Paul
McLenachan, Jim
Blaxill, Jonathan
Blackman, Daniel J
Malkin, Christopher
Wheatcroft, Stephen
Greenwood, John
author_facet Krishnamurthy, Arvindra
Keeble, Claire
Anderson, Michelle
Somers, Kathryn
Burton-Wood, Natalie
Harland, Charlotte
Baxter, Paul
McLenachan, Jim
Blaxill, Jonathan
Blackman, Daniel J
Malkin, Christopher
Wheatcroft, Stephen
Greenwood, John
author_sort Krishnamurthy, Arvindra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of real-world outcome data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to assess the association of choice of oral P2Y12-receptor inhibitor with clinical outcomes following PPCI for STEMI in a large consecutive patient series. METHODS: Demographic, procedural and 12-month outcome data were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing PPCI in Leeds, UK, between 01 January 2009 and 31 December 2011, and 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2013. Clinical endpoints were 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality, recurrent MI and 30-day HORIZONS-major bleeding. Logistic regression analyses were undertaken to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Prasugrel (n=1244) was associated with lower adjusted 30-day (OR 0.53 (0.34–0.85)) and 12-month (OR 0.55 (0.38–0.78)) mortality, and 12-month MI (OR 0.63 (0.42–0.94)) compared with clopidogrel (n=1648). Importantly, prasugrel was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality (OR 0.51 (0.29–0.91)) compared with ticagrelor (n=811). Lower 30-day (OR 0.40 (0.17–0.94)) and 12-month (OR 0.54 (0.32–0.93)) MI were observed in ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel, an association absent in comparison with prasugrel. Adjusted bleeding were not statistically significantly different among the P2Y12-receptor inhibitors. CONCLUSION: In this large consecutive real-world series, prasugrel was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality compared with ticagrelor and clopidogrel, and lower adjusted 12-month mortality compared with clopidogrel. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with lower recurrent MI following PPCI compared with clopidogrel, with no overall increase in adjusted bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6609142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66091422019-07-19 Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention Krishnamurthy, Arvindra Keeble, Claire Anderson, Michelle Somers, Kathryn Burton-Wood, Natalie Harland, Charlotte Baxter, Paul McLenachan, Jim Blaxill, Jonathan Blackman, Daniel J Malkin, Christopher Wheatcroft, Stephen Greenwood, John Open Heart Interventional Cardiology BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of real-world outcome data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to assess the association of choice of oral P2Y12-receptor inhibitor with clinical outcomes following PPCI for STEMI in a large consecutive patient series. METHODS: Demographic, procedural and 12-month outcome data were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing PPCI in Leeds, UK, between 01 January 2009 and 31 December 2011, and 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2013. Clinical endpoints were 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality, recurrent MI and 30-day HORIZONS-major bleeding. Logistic regression analyses were undertaken to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Prasugrel (n=1244) was associated with lower adjusted 30-day (OR 0.53 (0.34–0.85)) and 12-month (OR 0.55 (0.38–0.78)) mortality, and 12-month MI (OR 0.63 (0.42–0.94)) compared with clopidogrel (n=1648). Importantly, prasugrel was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality (OR 0.51 (0.29–0.91)) compared with ticagrelor (n=811). Lower 30-day (OR 0.40 (0.17–0.94)) and 12-month (OR 0.54 (0.32–0.93)) MI were observed in ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel, an association absent in comparison with prasugrel. Adjusted bleeding were not statistically significantly different among the P2Y12-receptor inhibitors. CONCLUSION: In this large consecutive real-world series, prasugrel was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality compared with ticagrelor and clopidogrel, and lower adjusted 12-month mortality compared with clopidogrel. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with lower recurrent MI following PPCI compared with clopidogrel, with no overall increase in adjusted bleeding. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6609142/ /pubmed/31328001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000951 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Interventional Cardiology
Krishnamurthy, Arvindra
Keeble, Claire
Anderson, Michelle
Somers, Kathryn
Burton-Wood, Natalie
Harland, Charlotte
Baxter, Paul
McLenachan, Jim
Blaxill, Jonathan
Blackman, Daniel J
Malkin, Christopher
Wheatcroft, Stephen
Greenwood, John
Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_fullStr Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_full_unstemmed Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_short Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
title_sort real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
topic Interventional Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31328001
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000951
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnamurthyarvindra realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT keebleclaire realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT andersonmichelle realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT somerskathryn realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT burtonwoodnatalie realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT harlandcharlotte realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT baxterpaul realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT mclenachanjim realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT blaxilljonathan realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT blackmandanielj realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT malkinchristopher realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT wheatcroftstephen realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention
AT greenwoodjohn realworldcomparisonofclopidogrelprasugrelandticagrelorinpatientsundergoingprimarypercutaneouscoronaryintervention