Cargando…
Inconsistency in Diarrhea Measurements when Assessing Intervention Impact in a Non-Blinded Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
To explore the consistency in impact evaluation based on reported diarrhea, we compared diarrhea data collected through two different surveys and with observed diarrhea-associated hospitalization for children aged ≤ 5 years from a non-blinded cluster-randomized trial conducted over 2 years in urban...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31162005 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0872 |
_version_ | 1783432266891919360 |
---|---|
author | Najnin, Nusrat Leder, Karin Forbes, Andrew Unicomb, Leanne Qadri, Firdausi Ram, Pavani K. Winch, Peter J. Begum, Farzana Biswas, Shwapon Parvin, Tahmina Yeasmin, Farzana Cravioto, Alejandro Luby, Stephen P. |
author_facet | Najnin, Nusrat Leder, Karin Forbes, Andrew Unicomb, Leanne Qadri, Firdausi Ram, Pavani K. Winch, Peter J. Begum, Farzana Biswas, Shwapon Parvin, Tahmina Yeasmin, Farzana Cravioto, Alejandro Luby, Stephen P. |
author_sort | Najnin, Nusrat |
collection | PubMed |
description | To explore the consistency in impact evaluation based on reported diarrhea, we compared diarrhea data collected through two different surveys and with observed diarrhea-associated hospitalization for children aged ≤ 5 years from a non-blinded cluster-randomized trial conducted over 2 years in urban Dhaka. We have previously reported that the interventions did not reduce diarrhea-associated hospitalization for children aged ≤ 5 years in this trial. We randomly allocated 90 geographic clusters comprising > 60,000 low-income households into three groups: cholera vaccine only, vaccine plus behavior change (cholera vaccine and handwashing plus drinking water chlorination promotion), and control. We calculated reported diarrhea prevalence within the last 2 days using data collected from two different survey methods. The “census” data were collected from each household every 6 months for updating household demographic information. The “monthly survey” data were collected every month from a subset of randomly selected study households for monitoring the uptake of behavior change interventions. We used binomial regression with a logarithmic link accounting for clustering to compare diarrhea prevalence across intervention and control groups separately for both census and monthly survey data. No intervention impact was detected in the census (vaccine only versus control: 2.32% versus 2.53%; P = 0.49; vaccine plus behavior change versus control: 2.44% versus 2.53%; P = 0.78) or in the vaccine only versus control in the monthly survey (3.39% versus 3.80%; P = 0.69). However, diarrhea prevalence was lower in the vaccine-plus-behavior-change group than control in the monthly survey (2.08% versus 3.80%; P = 0.02). Although the reasons for different observed treatment effects in the census and monthly survey data in this study are unclear, these findings emphasize the importance of assessing objective outcomes along with reported outcomes from non-blinded trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6609177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66091772019-07-19 Inconsistency in Diarrhea Measurements when Assessing Intervention Impact in a Non-Blinded Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial Najnin, Nusrat Leder, Karin Forbes, Andrew Unicomb, Leanne Qadri, Firdausi Ram, Pavani K. Winch, Peter J. Begum, Farzana Biswas, Shwapon Parvin, Tahmina Yeasmin, Farzana Cravioto, Alejandro Luby, Stephen P. Am J Trop Med Hyg Articles To explore the consistency in impact evaluation based on reported diarrhea, we compared diarrhea data collected through two different surveys and with observed diarrhea-associated hospitalization for children aged ≤ 5 years from a non-blinded cluster-randomized trial conducted over 2 years in urban Dhaka. We have previously reported that the interventions did not reduce diarrhea-associated hospitalization for children aged ≤ 5 years in this trial. We randomly allocated 90 geographic clusters comprising > 60,000 low-income households into three groups: cholera vaccine only, vaccine plus behavior change (cholera vaccine and handwashing plus drinking water chlorination promotion), and control. We calculated reported diarrhea prevalence within the last 2 days using data collected from two different survey methods. The “census” data were collected from each household every 6 months for updating household demographic information. The “monthly survey” data were collected every month from a subset of randomly selected study households for monitoring the uptake of behavior change interventions. We used binomial regression with a logarithmic link accounting for clustering to compare diarrhea prevalence across intervention and control groups separately for both census and monthly survey data. No intervention impact was detected in the census (vaccine only versus control: 2.32% versus 2.53%; P = 0.49; vaccine plus behavior change versus control: 2.44% versus 2.53%; P = 0.78) or in the vaccine only versus control in the monthly survey (3.39% versus 3.80%; P = 0.69). However, diarrhea prevalence was lower in the vaccine-plus-behavior-change group than control in the monthly survey (2.08% versus 3.80%; P = 0.02). Although the reasons for different observed treatment effects in the census and monthly survey data in this study are unclear, these findings emphasize the importance of assessing objective outcomes along with reported outcomes from non-blinded trials. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2019-07 2019-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6609177/ /pubmed/31162005 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0872 Text en © The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Najnin, Nusrat Leder, Karin Forbes, Andrew Unicomb, Leanne Qadri, Firdausi Ram, Pavani K. Winch, Peter J. Begum, Farzana Biswas, Shwapon Parvin, Tahmina Yeasmin, Farzana Cravioto, Alejandro Luby, Stephen P. Inconsistency in Diarrhea Measurements when Assessing Intervention Impact in a Non-Blinded Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Inconsistency in Diarrhea Measurements when Assessing Intervention Impact in a Non-Blinded Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Inconsistency in Diarrhea Measurements when Assessing Intervention Impact in a Non-Blinded Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Inconsistency in Diarrhea Measurements when Assessing Intervention Impact in a Non-Blinded Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Inconsistency in Diarrhea Measurements when Assessing Intervention Impact in a Non-Blinded Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Inconsistency in Diarrhea Measurements when Assessing Intervention Impact in a Non-Blinded Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | inconsistency in diarrhea measurements when assessing intervention impact in a non-blinded cluster-randomized controlled trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31162005 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT najninnusrat inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lederkarin inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT forbesandrew inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT unicombleanne inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT qadrifirdausi inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rampavanik inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT winchpeterj inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT begumfarzana inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT biswasshwapon inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parvintahmina inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yeasminfarzana inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT craviotoalejandro inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lubystephenp inconsistencyindiarrheameasurementswhenassessinginterventionimpactinanonblindedclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |