Cargando…
A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT
BACKGROUND: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9 |
_version_ | 1783432307510607872 |
---|---|
author | Langford, Rebecca Jago, Russell White, James Moore, Laurence Papadaki, Angeliki Hollingworth, William Metcalfe, Chris Ward, Dianne Campbell, Rona Wells, Sian Kipping, Ruth |
author_facet | Langford, Rebecca Jago, Russell White, James Moore, Laurence Papadaki, Angeliki Hollingworth, William Metcalfe, Chris Ward, Dianne Campbell, Rona Wells, Sian Kipping, Ruth |
author_sort | Langford, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on three key questions. 1. Was it feasible and acceptable to implement the intervention as planned? 2. How did the intervention affect staff and parent mediators? 3. Were the trial design and methods acceptable? METHODS: Twelve nurseries in south-west England were recruited and randomised to intervention or control. The intervention comprised: NAP SACC UK Partner (Health Visitor) support to nurseries to review practice and policies against best practice, and then set goals to improve physical activity, nutrition and oral health; two staff training workshops; and a web-based parent support element. The process evaluation comprised: observations of Partner training (n = 1), Partner/manager meetings (n = 5) and staff workshops (n = 10); semi-structured interviews with Partners (n = 4), managers (n = 12), staff (n = 4) and parents (n = 20); analysis of self-assessment forms, goal setting forms and Partner logbooks; and assessment of staff and parent knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy mediators. RESULTS: Overall, NAP SACC UK was feasible to implement and acceptable to nursery staff, managers, Partners and parents. The intervention was implemented as planned in five of the six intervention nurseries. Partners and managers appreciated the opportunity to review and improve nursery practices and valued the relationship forged between them. Staff rated the training workshops highly, despite attending outside of working hours. Most goals set by nurseries were achieved. However, Partners raised concerns about Health Visitors’ capacity to deliver the intervention in any subsequent roll out. Mediator scores improved in all but two areas in intervention staff and parents, with decreases or minimal changes in the control group. The web-based parent element was not well used and should be removed from any subsequent trial. The trial methods were acceptable to managers, staff, Partners and parents. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing and evaluating a physical activity and nutrition intervention in nursery settings is feasible and acceptable. A full RCT of NAP SACC UK (with appropriate modifications) is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16287377 (10 Apr 2015). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6609387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66093872019-07-16 A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT Langford, Rebecca Jago, Russell White, James Moore, Laurence Papadaki, Angeliki Hollingworth, William Metcalfe, Chris Ward, Dianne Campbell, Rona Wells, Sian Kipping, Ruth BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on three key questions. 1. Was it feasible and acceptable to implement the intervention as planned? 2. How did the intervention affect staff and parent mediators? 3. Were the trial design and methods acceptable? METHODS: Twelve nurseries in south-west England were recruited and randomised to intervention or control. The intervention comprised: NAP SACC UK Partner (Health Visitor) support to nurseries to review practice and policies against best practice, and then set goals to improve physical activity, nutrition and oral health; two staff training workshops; and a web-based parent support element. The process evaluation comprised: observations of Partner training (n = 1), Partner/manager meetings (n = 5) and staff workshops (n = 10); semi-structured interviews with Partners (n = 4), managers (n = 12), staff (n = 4) and parents (n = 20); analysis of self-assessment forms, goal setting forms and Partner logbooks; and assessment of staff and parent knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy mediators. RESULTS: Overall, NAP SACC UK was feasible to implement and acceptable to nursery staff, managers, Partners and parents. The intervention was implemented as planned in five of the six intervention nurseries. Partners and managers appreciated the opportunity to review and improve nursery practices and valued the relationship forged between them. Staff rated the training workshops highly, despite attending outside of working hours. Most goals set by nurseries were achieved. However, Partners raised concerns about Health Visitors’ capacity to deliver the intervention in any subsequent roll out. Mediator scores improved in all but two areas in intervention staff and parents, with decreases or minimal changes in the control group. The web-based parent element was not well used and should be removed from any subsequent trial. The trial methods were acceptable to managers, staff, Partners and parents. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing and evaluating a physical activity and nutrition intervention in nursery settings is feasible and acceptable. A full RCT of NAP SACC UK (with appropriate modifications) is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16287377 (10 Apr 2015). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6609387/ /pubmed/31269926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Langford, Rebecca Jago, Russell White, James Moore, Laurence Papadaki, Angeliki Hollingworth, William Metcalfe, Chris Ward, Dianne Campbell, Rona Wells, Sian Kipping, Ruth A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT |
title | A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT |
title_full | A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT |
title_fullStr | A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT |
title_full_unstemmed | A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT |
title_short | A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT |
title_sort | physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the nap sacc uk feasibility cluster rct |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langfordrebecca aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT jagorussell aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT whitejames aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT moorelaurence aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT papadakiangeliki aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT hollingworthwilliam aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT metcalfechris aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT warddianne aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT campbellrona aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT wellssian aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT kippingruth aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT langfordrebecca physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT jagorussell physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT whitejames physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT moorelaurence physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT papadakiangeliki physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT hollingworthwilliam physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT metcalfechris physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT warddianne physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT campbellrona physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT wellssian physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct AT kippingruth physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct |