Cargando…

A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT

BACKGROUND: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langford, Rebecca, Jago, Russell, White, James, Moore, Laurence, Papadaki, Angeliki, Hollingworth, William, Metcalfe, Chris, Ward, Dianne, Campbell, Rona, Wells, Sian, Kipping, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9
_version_ 1783432307510607872
author Langford, Rebecca
Jago, Russell
White, James
Moore, Laurence
Papadaki, Angeliki
Hollingworth, William
Metcalfe, Chris
Ward, Dianne
Campbell, Rona
Wells, Sian
Kipping, Ruth
author_facet Langford, Rebecca
Jago, Russell
White, James
Moore, Laurence
Papadaki, Angeliki
Hollingworth, William
Metcalfe, Chris
Ward, Dianne
Campbell, Rona
Wells, Sian
Kipping, Ruth
author_sort Langford, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on three key questions. 1. Was it feasible and acceptable to implement the intervention as planned? 2. How did the intervention affect staff and parent mediators? 3. Were the trial design and methods acceptable? METHODS: Twelve nurseries in south-west England were recruited and randomised to intervention or control. The intervention comprised: NAP SACC UK Partner (Health Visitor) support to nurseries to review practice and policies against best practice, and then set goals to improve physical activity, nutrition and oral health; two staff training workshops; and a web-based parent support element. The process evaluation comprised: observations of Partner training (n = 1), Partner/manager meetings (n = 5) and staff workshops (n = 10); semi-structured interviews with Partners (n = 4), managers (n = 12), staff (n = 4) and parents (n = 20); analysis of self-assessment forms, goal setting forms and Partner logbooks; and assessment of staff and parent knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy mediators. RESULTS: Overall, NAP SACC UK was feasible to implement and acceptable to nursery staff, managers, Partners and parents. The intervention was implemented as planned in five of the six intervention nurseries. Partners and managers appreciated the opportunity to review and improve nursery practices and valued the relationship forged between them. Staff rated the training workshops highly, despite attending outside of working hours. Most goals set by nurseries were achieved. However, Partners raised concerns about Health Visitors’ capacity to deliver the intervention in any subsequent roll out. Mediator scores improved in all but two areas in intervention staff and parents, with decreases or minimal changes in the control group. The web-based parent element was not well used and should be removed from any subsequent trial. The trial methods were acceptable to managers, staff, Partners and parents. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing and evaluating a physical activity and nutrition intervention in nursery settings is feasible and acceptable. A full RCT of NAP SACC UK (with appropriate modifications) is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16287377 (10 Apr 2015). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6609387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66093872019-07-16 A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT Langford, Rebecca Jago, Russell White, James Moore, Laurence Papadaki, Angeliki Hollingworth, William Metcalfe, Chris Ward, Dianne Campbell, Rona Wells, Sian Kipping, Ruth BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on three key questions. 1. Was it feasible and acceptable to implement the intervention as planned? 2. How did the intervention affect staff and parent mediators? 3. Were the trial design and methods acceptable? METHODS: Twelve nurseries in south-west England were recruited and randomised to intervention or control. The intervention comprised: NAP SACC UK Partner (Health Visitor) support to nurseries to review practice and policies against best practice, and then set goals to improve physical activity, nutrition and oral health; two staff training workshops; and a web-based parent support element. The process evaluation comprised: observations of Partner training (n = 1), Partner/manager meetings (n = 5) and staff workshops (n = 10); semi-structured interviews with Partners (n = 4), managers (n = 12), staff (n = 4) and parents (n = 20); analysis of self-assessment forms, goal setting forms and Partner logbooks; and assessment of staff and parent knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy mediators. RESULTS: Overall, NAP SACC UK was feasible to implement and acceptable to nursery staff, managers, Partners and parents. The intervention was implemented as planned in five of the six intervention nurseries. Partners and managers appreciated the opportunity to review and improve nursery practices and valued the relationship forged between them. Staff rated the training workshops highly, despite attending outside of working hours. Most goals set by nurseries were achieved. However, Partners raised concerns about Health Visitors’ capacity to deliver the intervention in any subsequent roll out. Mediator scores improved in all but two areas in intervention staff and parents, with decreases or minimal changes in the control group. The web-based parent element was not well used and should be removed from any subsequent trial. The trial methods were acceptable to managers, staff, Partners and parents. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing and evaluating a physical activity and nutrition intervention in nursery settings is feasible and acceptable. A full RCT of NAP SACC UK (with appropriate modifications) is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN16287377 (10 Apr 2015). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6609387/ /pubmed/31269926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Langford, Rebecca
Jago, Russell
White, James
Moore, Laurence
Papadaki, Angeliki
Hollingworth, William
Metcalfe, Chris
Ward, Dianne
Campbell, Rona
Wells, Sian
Kipping, Ruth
A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT
title A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT
title_full A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT
title_fullStr A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT
title_full_unstemmed A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT
title_short A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT
title_sort physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the nap sacc uk feasibility cluster rct
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9
work_keys_str_mv AT langfordrebecca aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT jagorussell aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT whitejames aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT moorelaurence aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT papadakiangeliki aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT hollingworthwilliam aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT metcalfechris aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT warddianne aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT campbellrona aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT wellssian aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT kippingruth aphysicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT langfordrebecca physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT jagorussell physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT whitejames physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT moorelaurence physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT papadakiangeliki physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT hollingworthwilliam physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT metcalfechris physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT warddianne physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT campbellrona physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT wellssian physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct
AT kippingruth physicalactivitynutritionandoralhealthinterventioninnurserysettingsprocessevaluationofthenapsaccukfeasibilityclusterrct