Simulated occlusal adjustments and their effects on zirconia and antagonist artificial enamel

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of occlusal adjustments on the surface roughness of yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) and wear of opposing artificial enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five Y-TZP slabs from each brand (Lava, 3M and Bruxzir, Glidewell Laboratories) with different surface conditions (Control polished - CPZ; Polished/ground - GRZ; Polished/ground/repolished - RPZ; Glazed - GZ; Porcelain-veneered - PVZ; n=5) were abraded (500,000 cycles, 80 N) against artificial enamel (6 mm diameter steatite). Y-TZP roughness (in µm) before and after chewing simulation (CS) and antagonist steatite volume loss (in mm(3)) were evaluated using a contact surface profilometer. Y-TZP roughness was analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and teatite wear by two-way ANOVA and Tukey Honest Difference (HSD) (P=.05). RESULTS: There was no effect of Y-TZP brand on surface roughness (P=.216) and steatite loss (P=.064). A significant interaction effect (P<.001) between surface condition and CS on Y-TZP roughness was observed. GZ specimens showed higher roughness after CS (before CS − 3.7 ± 1.8 µm; after CS − 13.54 ± 3.11 µm), with partial removal of the glaze layer. Indenters abraded against CPZ (0.09 ± 0.03 mm(3)) were worn more than those abraded against PVZ (0.02 ± 0.01 mm(3)) and GZ (0.02 ± 0.01 mm(3)). Higher wear caused by direct abrasion against zirconia was confirmed by SEM. CONCLUSION: Polishing with an intraoral polishing system did not reduce the roughness of zirconia. Wear of the opposing artificial enamel was affected by the material on the surface rather than the finishing technique applied, indicating that polished zirconia is more deleterious to artificial enamel than are glazed and porcelain-veneered restorations.