Cargando…

Comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Food and Drug Administration recommends research into developing well-defined and reliable endpoints to evaluate treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization. A novel 6-category ordinal endpoint of patient health status after 7 days that ranges from death to hospita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peterson, Ross L., Vock, David M., Babiker, Abdel, Powers, John H., Hunsberger, Sally, Angus, Brian, Paez, Armando, Neaton, James D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100401
_version_ 1783432386607841280
author Peterson, Ross L.
Vock, David M.
Babiker, Abdel
Powers, John H.
Hunsberger, Sally
Angus, Brian
Paez, Armando
Neaton, James D.
author_facet Peterson, Ross L.
Vock, David M.
Babiker, Abdel
Powers, John H.
Hunsberger, Sally
Angus, Brian
Paez, Armando
Neaton, James D.
author_sort Peterson, Ross L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Food and Drug Administration recommends research into developing well-defined and reliable endpoints to evaluate treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization. A novel 6-category ordinal endpoint of patient health status after 7 days that ranges from death to hospital discharge with resumption of normal activities is being used in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for severe influenza (FLU-IVIG). We compare the power of the ordinal endpoint under a proportional odds model to other types of endpoints as a function of various trial parameters. METHODS: We used closed-form analysis and empirical simulation to compare the power of the ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints. In the simulation setting, we varied the treatment effect and the distribution of the placebo group across the follow-up period with consideration of adjustment for baseline health status. RESULTS: In the analytic setting, ordinal endpoints of high granularity provided greater power than time-to-event endpoints when most patients in the placebo group had either naturally progressed to the category of hospital discharge by day 7 or were far from hospital discharge on day 7. In the simulation setting, adjustment for baseline health status universally raised power for the proportional odds model. Across different placebo group distributions of the ordinal endpoint regardless of adjustment for baseline health status, only time-to-event endpoints yielded higher power than the ordinal endpoint for certain treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: In this case study, the FLU-IVIG ordinal endpoint provided greater power than time-to-event, binary, and longitudinal endpoints for most scenarios of the treatment effect and placebo group distribution, including the target population studied for FLU-IVIG. The ordinal endpoint was only surpassed by the time-to-event endpoint when many patients in the placebo group were on the cusp of hospital discharge on day 7 and the follow-up period for the time-to-event endpoint was extended to allow for additional events. Our general approach for evaluating the power of several potential endpoints for an influenza trial can be used for designing other influenza trials with different target populations and for other trials in other disease areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6609815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66098152019-07-16 Comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization Peterson, Ross L. Vock, David M. Babiker, Abdel Powers, John H. Hunsberger, Sally Angus, Brian Paez, Armando Neaton, James D. Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Food and Drug Administration recommends research into developing well-defined and reliable endpoints to evaluate treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization. A novel 6-category ordinal endpoint of patient health status after 7 days that ranges from death to hospital discharge with resumption of normal activities is being used in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for severe influenza (FLU-IVIG). We compare the power of the ordinal endpoint under a proportional odds model to other types of endpoints as a function of various trial parameters. METHODS: We used closed-form analysis and empirical simulation to compare the power of the ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints. In the simulation setting, we varied the treatment effect and the distribution of the placebo group across the follow-up period with consideration of adjustment for baseline health status. RESULTS: In the analytic setting, ordinal endpoints of high granularity provided greater power than time-to-event endpoints when most patients in the placebo group had either naturally progressed to the category of hospital discharge by day 7 or were far from hospital discharge on day 7. In the simulation setting, adjustment for baseline health status universally raised power for the proportional odds model. Across different placebo group distributions of the ordinal endpoint regardless of adjustment for baseline health status, only time-to-event endpoints yielded higher power than the ordinal endpoint for certain treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: In this case study, the FLU-IVIG ordinal endpoint provided greater power than time-to-event, binary, and longitudinal endpoints for most scenarios of the treatment effect and placebo group distribution, including the target population studied for FLU-IVIG. The ordinal endpoint was only surpassed by the time-to-event endpoint when many patients in the placebo group were on the cusp of hospital discharge on day 7 and the follow-up period for the time-to-event endpoint was extended to allow for additional events. Our general approach for evaluating the power of several potential endpoints for an influenza trial can be used for designing other influenza trials with different target populations and for other trials in other disease areas. Elsevier 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6609815/ /pubmed/31312748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100401 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Peterson, Ross L.
Vock, David M.
Babiker, Abdel
Powers, John H.
Hunsberger, Sally
Angus, Brian
Paez, Armando
Neaton, James D.
Comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization
title Comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization
title_full Comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization
title_fullStr Comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization
title_short Comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization
title_sort comparison of an ordinal endpoint to time-to-event, longitudinal, and binary endpoints for use in evaluating treatments for severe influenza requiring hospitalization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100401
work_keys_str_mv AT petersonrossl comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization
AT vockdavidm comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization
AT babikerabdel comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization
AT powersjohnh comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization
AT hunsbergersally comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization
AT angusbrian comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization
AT paezarmando comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization
AT neatonjamesd comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization
AT comparisonofanordinalendpointtotimetoeventlongitudinalandbinaryendpointsforuseinevaluatingtreatmentsforsevereinfluenzarequiringhospitalization