Cargando…

Common mental disorders through the eyes of German employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey

PURPOSE: Common mental disorders (CMDs) are becoming increasingly relevant in the working world. Numbers of risk factors have been confirmed by mostly correlative cross-sectional studies. Comprehensive and effective prevention is urgently needed. There is little knowledge about employees’ own percep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgess, Stephanie, Junne, Florian, Rothermund, Eva, Zipfel, Stephan, Gündel, Harald, Rieger, Monika A., Michaelis, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30729316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01414-7
_version_ 1783432389394956288
author Burgess, Stephanie
Junne, Florian
Rothermund, Eva
Zipfel, Stephan
Gündel, Harald
Rieger, Monika A.
Michaelis, Martina
author_facet Burgess, Stephanie
Junne, Florian
Rothermund, Eva
Zipfel, Stephan
Gündel, Harald
Rieger, Monika A.
Michaelis, Martina
author_sort Burgess, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Common mental disorders (CMDs) are becoming increasingly relevant in the working world. Numbers of risk factors have been confirmed by mostly correlative cross-sectional studies. Comprehensive and effective prevention is urgently needed. There is little knowledge about employees’ own perceptions on causes of CMDs and prevention measures. Therefore, a survey was conducted in 2016. METHODS: A standardised instrument was developed for an online survey in a commercial access panel, targeted employees in different job types. We assessed two outcomes: perceived relevance of (1) work-related demands to the development of CMDs, and (2) prevention approaches in the workplace and on individual and societal levels. Possible predictive aspects were analysed exploratively by multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The response rate was 75% (n = 610). Job types were categorised as “blue”, “grey” and “white-collar” workers (n = 193, 169, 248). The majority of respondents rated both outcomes consistently as “quite” or “very relevant”; societal prevention strategies were more relevant for non-white-collar workers. Perceived relevance of individual predisposition to develop a CMD was the strongest predictor for both outcomes, indicating the perception that people with higher personal vulnerability might suffer a higher strain from work-related risk factors than others. CONCLUSION: We assume that participants in our survey judged the relevance of work-related causes of CMDs independently of their own workload. The perceived relevance of prevention measures in different areas is consistent with official guidelines. A possible selection bias due to characteristics of access panel collectives and own direct or indirect experiences with CMD should be critically questioned. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00420-019-01414-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6609828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66098282019-07-19 Common mental disorders through the eyes of German employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey Burgess, Stephanie Junne, Florian Rothermund, Eva Zipfel, Stephan Gündel, Harald Rieger, Monika A. Michaelis, Martina Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article PURPOSE: Common mental disorders (CMDs) are becoming increasingly relevant in the working world. Numbers of risk factors have been confirmed by mostly correlative cross-sectional studies. Comprehensive and effective prevention is urgently needed. There is little knowledge about employees’ own perceptions on causes of CMDs and prevention measures. Therefore, a survey was conducted in 2016. METHODS: A standardised instrument was developed for an online survey in a commercial access panel, targeted employees in different job types. We assessed two outcomes: perceived relevance of (1) work-related demands to the development of CMDs, and (2) prevention approaches in the workplace and on individual and societal levels. Possible predictive aspects were analysed exploratively by multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The response rate was 75% (n = 610). Job types were categorised as “blue”, “grey” and “white-collar” workers (n = 193, 169, 248). The majority of respondents rated both outcomes consistently as “quite” or “very relevant”; societal prevention strategies were more relevant for non-white-collar workers. Perceived relevance of individual predisposition to develop a CMD was the strongest predictor for both outcomes, indicating the perception that people with higher personal vulnerability might suffer a higher strain from work-related risk factors than others. CONCLUSION: We assume that participants in our survey judged the relevance of work-related causes of CMDs independently of their own workload. The perceived relevance of prevention measures in different areas is consistent with official guidelines. A possible selection bias due to characteristics of access panel collectives and own direct or indirect experiences with CMD should be critically questioned. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00420-019-01414-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-02-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6609828/ /pubmed/30729316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01414-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Burgess, Stephanie
Junne, Florian
Rothermund, Eva
Zipfel, Stephan
Gündel, Harald
Rieger, Monika A.
Michaelis, Martina
Common mental disorders through the eyes of German employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey
title Common mental disorders through the eyes of German employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey
title_full Common mental disorders through the eyes of German employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey
title_fullStr Common mental disorders through the eyes of German employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey
title_full_unstemmed Common mental disorders through the eyes of German employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey
title_short Common mental disorders through the eyes of German employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey
title_sort common mental disorders through the eyes of german employees: attributed relevance of work-related causes and prevention measures assessed by a standardised survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30729316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01414-7
work_keys_str_mv AT burgessstephanie commonmentaldisordersthroughtheeyesofgermanemployeesattributedrelevanceofworkrelatedcausesandpreventionmeasuresassessedbyastandardisedsurvey
AT junneflorian commonmentaldisordersthroughtheeyesofgermanemployeesattributedrelevanceofworkrelatedcausesandpreventionmeasuresassessedbyastandardisedsurvey
AT rothermundeva commonmentaldisordersthroughtheeyesofgermanemployeesattributedrelevanceofworkrelatedcausesandpreventionmeasuresassessedbyastandardisedsurvey
AT zipfelstephan commonmentaldisordersthroughtheeyesofgermanemployeesattributedrelevanceofworkrelatedcausesandpreventionmeasuresassessedbyastandardisedsurvey
AT gundelharald commonmentaldisordersthroughtheeyesofgermanemployeesattributedrelevanceofworkrelatedcausesandpreventionmeasuresassessedbyastandardisedsurvey
AT riegermonikaa commonmentaldisordersthroughtheeyesofgermanemployeesattributedrelevanceofworkrelatedcausesandpreventionmeasuresassessedbyastandardisedsurvey
AT michaelismartina commonmentaldisordersthroughtheeyesofgermanemployeesattributedrelevanceofworkrelatedcausesandpreventionmeasuresassessedbyastandardisedsurvey