Cargando…

Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have evidenced cement-in-cement techniques as reliable in revision arthroplasty. Commonly, the original cement mantle is reshaped, aiding accurate placement of the new stem. Ultrasonic devices selectively remove cement, preserve host bone, and have lower cortical perfora...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liddle, A., Webb, M., Clement, N., Green, S., Liddle, J., German, M., Holland, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Hip
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0313.R1
_version_ 1783432397405028352
author Liddle, A.
Webb, M.
Clement, N.
Green, S.
Liddle, J.
German, M.
Holland, J.
author_facet Liddle, A.
Webb, M.
Clement, N.
Green, S.
Liddle, J.
German, M.
Holland, J.
author_sort Liddle, A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have evidenced cement-in-cement techniques as reliable in revision arthroplasty. Commonly, the original cement mantle is reshaped, aiding accurate placement of the new stem. Ultrasonic devices selectively remove cement, preserve host bone, and have lower cortical perforation rates than other techniques. As far as the authors are aware, the impact of ultrasonic devices on final cement-in-cement bonds has not been investigated. This study assessed the impact of cement removal using the Orthosonics System for Cemented Arthroplasty Revision (OSCAR; Orthosonics) on final cement-in-cement bonds. METHODS: A total of 24 specimens were manufactured by pouring cement (Simplex P Bone Cement; Stryker) into stainless steel moulds, with a central rod polished to Stryker Exeter V40 specifications. After cement curing, the rods were removed and eight specimens were allocated to each of three internal surface preparation groups: 1) burr; 2) OSCAR; and 3) no treatment. Internal holes were recemented, and each specimen was cut into 5 mm discs. Shear testing of discs was completed by a technician blinded to the original grouping, recording ultimate shear strengths. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was completed, inspecting surfaces of shear-tested specimens. RESULTS: The mean shear strength for OSCAR-prepared specimens (33.6 MPa) was significantly lower than for the control (46.3 MPa) and burr (45.8 MPa) groups (p < 0.001; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc analysis). There was no significant difference in shear strengths between control and burr groups (p = 0.57). Scanning electron microscopy of OSCAR specimens revealed evidence of porosity undiscovered in previous studies. CONCLUSION: Results show that the cement removal technique impacts on final cement-in-cement bonds. This in vitro study demonstrates significantly weaker bonds when using OSCAR prior to recementation into an old cement mantle compared with cement prepared with a burr or no treatment. This infers that care must be taken in surgical decision-making regarding cement removal techniques used during cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty, suggesting that the risks and benefits of ultrasonic cement removal need consideration. Cite this article: A. Liddle, M. Webb, N. Clement, S. Green, J. Liddle, M. German, J. Holland. Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond? Bone Joint Res 2019;8:246–252. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0313.R1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6609863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66098632019-07-25 Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond? Liddle, A. Webb, M. Clement, N. Green, S. Liddle, J. German, M. Holland, J. Bone Joint Res Hip OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have evidenced cement-in-cement techniques as reliable in revision arthroplasty. Commonly, the original cement mantle is reshaped, aiding accurate placement of the new stem. Ultrasonic devices selectively remove cement, preserve host bone, and have lower cortical perforation rates than other techniques. As far as the authors are aware, the impact of ultrasonic devices on final cement-in-cement bonds has not been investigated. This study assessed the impact of cement removal using the Orthosonics System for Cemented Arthroplasty Revision (OSCAR; Orthosonics) on final cement-in-cement bonds. METHODS: A total of 24 specimens were manufactured by pouring cement (Simplex P Bone Cement; Stryker) into stainless steel moulds, with a central rod polished to Stryker Exeter V40 specifications. After cement curing, the rods were removed and eight specimens were allocated to each of three internal surface preparation groups: 1) burr; 2) OSCAR; and 3) no treatment. Internal holes were recemented, and each specimen was cut into 5 mm discs. Shear testing of discs was completed by a technician blinded to the original grouping, recording ultimate shear strengths. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was completed, inspecting surfaces of shear-tested specimens. RESULTS: The mean shear strength for OSCAR-prepared specimens (33.6 MPa) was significantly lower than for the control (46.3 MPa) and burr (45.8 MPa) groups (p < 0.001; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc analysis). There was no significant difference in shear strengths between control and burr groups (p = 0.57). Scanning electron microscopy of OSCAR specimens revealed evidence of porosity undiscovered in previous studies. CONCLUSION: Results show that the cement removal technique impacts on final cement-in-cement bonds. This in vitro study demonstrates significantly weaker bonds when using OSCAR prior to recementation into an old cement mantle compared with cement prepared with a burr or no treatment. This infers that care must be taken in surgical decision-making regarding cement removal techniques used during cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty, suggesting that the risks and benefits of ultrasonic cement removal need consideration. Cite this article: A. Liddle, M. Webb, N. Clement, S. Green, J. Liddle, M. German, J. Holland. Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond? Bone Joint Res 2019;8:246–252. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0313.R1. 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6609863/ /pubmed/31346452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0313.R1 Text en © 2019 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Hip
Liddle, A.
Webb, M.
Clement, N.
Green, S.
Liddle, J.
German, M.
Holland, J.
Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?
title Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?
title_full Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?
title_fullStr Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?
title_short Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?
title_sort ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: what is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?
topic Hip
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6609863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31346452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0313.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT liddlea ultrasoniccementremovalincementincementrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatistheeffectonthefinalcementincementbond
AT webbm ultrasoniccementremovalincementincementrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatistheeffectonthefinalcementincementbond
AT clementn ultrasoniccementremovalincementincementrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatistheeffectonthefinalcementincementbond
AT greens ultrasoniccementremovalincementincementrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatistheeffectonthefinalcementincementbond
AT liddlej ultrasoniccementremovalincementincementrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatistheeffectonthefinalcementincementbond
AT germanm ultrasoniccementremovalincementincementrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatistheeffectonthefinalcementincementbond
AT hollandj ultrasoniccementremovalincementincementrevisiontotalhiparthroplastywhatistheeffectonthefinalcementincementbond