Cargando…

The prognostic value of the preoperative albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer after surgery

BACKGROUND: To assess the potential prognostic value of the albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery. METHODS: The log‐rank and Kaplan‐Meier analyses were performed to detect differences in survival levels between different groups...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lianmin, Zhang, Hua, Yue, Dongsheng, Wei, Wei, Chen, Yulong, Zhao, Xiaoliang, Zhu, Jianquan, Zhang, Bin, Zhang, Zhenfa, Wang, Changli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31161711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13107
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To assess the potential prognostic value of the albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery. METHODS: The log‐rank and Kaplan‐Meier analyses were performed to detect differences in survival levels between different groups. A model of Cox proportional hazards was used to perform univariate and multivariate survival analyses. Comparisons of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the likelihood ratio test (LRT) were also utilized to compare the prognostic abilities of different systems for overall survival (OS) prediction. RESULTS: The optimal cut‐off value of the preoperative AAPR was 0.64. A decreased AAPR was associated with several clinicopathological and clinicolaboratory variables related to cancer progression. The preoperative AAPR of patients was positively correlated with the poor prognosis of NSCLC. In multivariate analyses, the preoperative AAPR was identified as an independent prognostic factor for disease‐free survival (DFS; P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.003). The LRT showed that the AAPR tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) system presented a significantly larger χ(2) value (112.4 vs. 89.2, respectively, P < 0.01) and a relatively smaller Akaike information criterion (AIC) value (2955 vs. 2977, respectively, P < 0.01) than the TNM staging system. CONCLUSION: Preoperative AAPR was a potentially valuable prognostic factor in NSCLC patients who underwent surgery. Our results further showed that the AAPR‐TNM system was superior to the current TNM staging system.