Cargando…

Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: Compare the performance of zone-specific multi-parametric-MRI (mp-MRI) diagnostic models in prostate cancer detection with experienced radiologists. METHODS: A single-centre, IRB approved, prospective STARD compliant 3 T MRI test dataset of 203 patients was generated to test validity and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dikaios, Nikolaos, Giganti, Francesco, Sidhu, Harbir S., Johnston, Edward W., Appayya, Mrishta B., Simmons, Lucy, Freeman, Alex, Ahmed, Hashim U., Atkinson, David, Punwani, Shonit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5799-y
_version_ 1783432473338707968
author Dikaios, Nikolaos
Giganti, Francesco
Sidhu, Harbir S.
Johnston, Edward W.
Appayya, Mrishta B.
Simmons, Lucy
Freeman, Alex
Ahmed, Hashim U.
Atkinson, David
Punwani, Shonit
author_facet Dikaios, Nikolaos
Giganti, Francesco
Sidhu, Harbir S.
Johnston, Edward W.
Appayya, Mrishta B.
Simmons, Lucy
Freeman, Alex
Ahmed, Hashim U.
Atkinson, David
Punwani, Shonit
author_sort Dikaios, Nikolaos
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Compare the performance of zone-specific multi-parametric-MRI (mp-MRI) diagnostic models in prostate cancer detection with experienced radiologists. METHODS: A single-centre, IRB approved, prospective STARD compliant 3 T MRI test dataset of 203 patients was generated to test validity and generalisability of previously reported 1.5 T mp-MRI diagnostic models. All patients included within the test dataset underwent 3 T mp-MRI, comprising T2, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging followed by transperineal template ± targeted index lesion biopsy. Separate diagnostic models (transition zone (TZ) and peripheral zone (PZ)) were applied to respective zones. Sensitivity/specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) were calculated for the two zone-specific models. Two radiologists (A and B) independently Likert scored test 3 T mp-MRI dataset, allowing ROC analysis for each radiologist for each prostate zone. RESULTS: Diagnostic models applied to the test dataset demonstrated a ROC-AUC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.67–0.81) in the PZ and 0.68 (95% CI 0.61–0.75) in the TZ. Radiologist A/B had a ROC-AUC = 0.78/0.74 in the PZ and 0.69/0.69 in the TZ. Radiologists A and B each scored 51 patients in the PZ and 41 and 45 patients respectively in the TZ as Likert 3. The PZ model demonstrated a ROC-AUC = 0.65/0.67 for the patients Likert scored as indeterminate by radiologist A/B respectively, whereas the TZ model demonstrated a ROC-AUC = 0.74/0.69. CONCLUSION: Zone-specific mp-MRI diagnostic models demonstrate generalisability between 1.5 and 3 T mp-MRI protocols and show similar classification performance to experienced radiologists for prostate cancer detection. Results also indicate the ability of diagnostic models to classify cases with an indeterminate radiologist score. KEY POINTS: • MRI diagnostic models had similar performance to experienced radiologists for classification of prostate cancer. • MRI diagnostic models may help radiologists classify tumour in patients with indeterminate Likert 3 scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6610264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66102642019-07-19 Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer Dikaios, Nikolaos Giganti, Francesco Sidhu, Harbir S. Johnston, Edward W. Appayya, Mrishta B. Simmons, Lucy Freeman, Alex Ahmed, Hashim U. Atkinson, David Punwani, Shonit Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: Compare the performance of zone-specific multi-parametric-MRI (mp-MRI) diagnostic models in prostate cancer detection with experienced radiologists. METHODS: A single-centre, IRB approved, prospective STARD compliant 3 T MRI test dataset of 203 patients was generated to test validity and generalisability of previously reported 1.5 T mp-MRI diagnostic models. All patients included within the test dataset underwent 3 T mp-MRI, comprising T2, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging followed by transperineal template ± targeted index lesion biopsy. Separate diagnostic models (transition zone (TZ) and peripheral zone (PZ)) were applied to respective zones. Sensitivity/specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) were calculated for the two zone-specific models. Two radiologists (A and B) independently Likert scored test 3 T mp-MRI dataset, allowing ROC analysis for each radiologist for each prostate zone. RESULTS: Diagnostic models applied to the test dataset demonstrated a ROC-AUC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.67–0.81) in the PZ and 0.68 (95% CI 0.61–0.75) in the TZ. Radiologist A/B had a ROC-AUC = 0.78/0.74 in the PZ and 0.69/0.69 in the TZ. Radiologists A and B each scored 51 patients in the PZ and 41 and 45 patients respectively in the TZ as Likert 3. The PZ model demonstrated a ROC-AUC = 0.65/0.67 for the patients Likert scored as indeterminate by radiologist A/B respectively, whereas the TZ model demonstrated a ROC-AUC = 0.74/0.69. CONCLUSION: Zone-specific mp-MRI diagnostic models demonstrate generalisability between 1.5 and 3 T mp-MRI protocols and show similar classification performance to experienced radiologists for prostate cancer detection. Results also indicate the ability of diagnostic models to classify cases with an indeterminate radiologist score. KEY POINTS: • MRI diagnostic models had similar performance to experienced radiologists for classification of prostate cancer. • MRI diagnostic models may help radiologists classify tumour in patients with indeterminate Likert 3 scores. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-19 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6610264/ /pubmed/30456585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5799-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Dikaios, Nikolaos
Giganti, Francesco
Sidhu, Harbir S.
Johnston, Edward W.
Appayya, Mrishta B.
Simmons, Lucy
Freeman, Alex
Ahmed, Hashim U.
Atkinson, David
Punwani, Shonit
Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer
title Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer
title_full Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer
title_fullStr Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer
title_short Multi-parametric MRI zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer
title_sort multi-parametric mri zone-specific diagnostic model performance compared with experienced radiologists for detection of prostate cancer
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30456585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5799-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dikaiosnikolaos multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT gigantifrancesco multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT sidhuharbirs multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT johnstonedwardw multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT appayyamrishtab multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT simmonslucy multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT freemanalex multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT ahmedhashimu multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT atkinsondavid multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer
AT punwanishonit multiparametricmrizonespecificdiagnosticmodelperformancecomparedwithexperiencedradiologistsfordetectionofprostatecancer