Cargando…
Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography
OBJECTIVES: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the standard of reference, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in assessing disk injuries in patients aged more than 50 years with vertebral fractures. METHODS: This prospective study was approve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30649597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4 |
_version_ | 1783432474524647424 |
---|---|
author | Pumberger, Matthias Fuchs, Michael Engelhard, Nils Hermann, Kay Geert Putzier, Michael Makowski, Marcus R. Hamm, Bernd Diekhoff, Torsten |
author_facet | Pumberger, Matthias Fuchs, Michael Engelhard, Nils Hermann, Kay Geert Putzier, Michael Makowski, Marcus R. Hamm, Bernd Diekhoff, Torsten |
author_sort | Pumberger, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the standard of reference, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in assessing disk injuries in patients aged more than 50 years with vertebral fractures. METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee (EA1/372/14), and all patients gave written informed consent. Patients with suspected fractures underwent spinal DECTs and MRIs. Three readers scored DECT collagen maps for the presence or absence of disk injuries and also scored MR images according to the Sander classification (0–3). Only disks at risk (target disks) were included in the analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Fleiss’s κ was used to evaluate interrater agreement. Attenuation, in Hounsfield units, was compared between affected and unaffected disks in DECT. RESULTS: Analyzing 295 disks in 67 patients, DECT was both sensitive (0.85) and specific (0.75). Sensitivity varied with the severity of disk damage, as assessed using the Sander scale (grade 1, 0.80; 2, 0.85; and 3, 0.98). Fleiss’s κ was 0.41 for MRI and 0.51 for DECT. In the DECT collagen maps, attenuation was lower in injured disks compared to that in normal disks (80.3 ± 35.2 vs. 97.9 ± 41.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional CT, DECT collagen maps can yield more diagnostic information, allowing identification of disk injuries in elderly patients with vertebral fractures. KEY POINTS: • Dual-energy computed tomography allows vertebral disk injuries to be detected in elderly patients with vertebral fractures. • Dual-energy computed tomography yields more diagnostic information about vertebral disks compared to conventional CT. • Dual-energy computed tomography can be used as an alternative imaging modality for patients unwilling or unable to undergo MRI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6610270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66102702019-07-19 Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography Pumberger, Matthias Fuchs, Michael Engelhard, Nils Hermann, Kay Geert Putzier, Michael Makowski, Marcus R. Hamm, Bernd Diekhoff, Torsten Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVES: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the standard of reference, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in assessing disk injuries in patients aged more than 50 years with vertebral fractures. METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee (EA1/372/14), and all patients gave written informed consent. Patients with suspected fractures underwent spinal DECTs and MRIs. Three readers scored DECT collagen maps for the presence or absence of disk injuries and also scored MR images according to the Sander classification (0–3). Only disks at risk (target disks) were included in the analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Fleiss’s κ was used to evaluate interrater agreement. Attenuation, in Hounsfield units, was compared between affected and unaffected disks in DECT. RESULTS: Analyzing 295 disks in 67 patients, DECT was both sensitive (0.85) and specific (0.75). Sensitivity varied with the severity of disk damage, as assessed using the Sander scale (grade 1, 0.80; 2, 0.85; and 3, 0.98). Fleiss’s κ was 0.41 for MRI and 0.51 for DECT. In the DECT collagen maps, attenuation was lower in injured disks compared to that in normal disks (80.3 ± 35.2 vs. 97.9 ± 41.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional CT, DECT collagen maps can yield more diagnostic information, allowing identification of disk injuries in elderly patients with vertebral fractures. KEY POINTS: • Dual-energy computed tomography allows vertebral disk injuries to be detected in elderly patients with vertebral fractures. • Dual-energy computed tomography yields more diagnostic information about vertebral disks compared to conventional CT. • Dual-energy computed tomography can be used as an alternative imaging modality for patients unwilling or unable to undergo MRI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-01-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6610270/ /pubmed/30649597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Musculoskeletal Pumberger, Matthias Fuchs, Michael Engelhard, Nils Hermann, Kay Geert Putzier, Michael Makowski, Marcus R. Hamm, Bernd Diekhoff, Torsten Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography |
title | Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography |
title_full | Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography |
title_short | Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography |
title_sort | disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography |
topic | Musculoskeletal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30649597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pumbergermatthias diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography AT fuchsmichael diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography AT engelhardnils diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography AT hermannkaygeert diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography AT putziermichael diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography AT makowskimarcusr diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography AT hammbernd diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography AT diekhofftorsten diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography |