Cargando…

Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography

OBJECTIVES: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the standard of reference, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in assessing disk injuries in patients aged more than 50 years with vertebral fractures. METHODS: This prospective study was approve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pumberger, Matthias, Fuchs, Michael, Engelhard, Nils, Hermann, Kay Geert, Putzier, Michael, Makowski, Marcus R., Hamm, Bernd, Diekhoff, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30649597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4
_version_ 1783432474524647424
author Pumberger, Matthias
Fuchs, Michael
Engelhard, Nils
Hermann, Kay Geert
Putzier, Michael
Makowski, Marcus R.
Hamm, Bernd
Diekhoff, Torsten
author_facet Pumberger, Matthias
Fuchs, Michael
Engelhard, Nils
Hermann, Kay Geert
Putzier, Michael
Makowski, Marcus R.
Hamm, Bernd
Diekhoff, Torsten
author_sort Pumberger, Matthias
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the standard of reference, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in assessing disk injuries in patients aged more than 50 years with vertebral fractures. METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee (EA1/372/14), and all patients gave written informed consent. Patients with suspected fractures underwent spinal DECTs and MRIs. Three readers scored DECT collagen maps for the presence or absence of disk injuries and also scored MR images according to the Sander classification (0–3). Only disks at risk (target disks) were included in the analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Fleiss’s κ was used to evaluate interrater agreement. Attenuation, in Hounsfield units, was compared between affected and unaffected disks in DECT. RESULTS: Analyzing 295 disks in 67 patients, DECT was both sensitive (0.85) and specific (0.75). Sensitivity varied with the severity of disk damage, as assessed using the Sander scale (grade 1, 0.80; 2, 0.85; and 3, 0.98). Fleiss’s κ was 0.41 for MRI and 0.51 for DECT. In the DECT collagen maps, attenuation was lower in injured disks compared to that in normal disks (80.3 ± 35.2 vs. 97.9 ± 41.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional CT, DECT collagen maps can yield more diagnostic information, allowing identification of disk injuries in elderly patients with vertebral fractures. KEY POINTS: • Dual-energy computed tomography allows vertebral disk injuries to be detected in elderly patients with vertebral fractures. • Dual-energy computed tomography yields more diagnostic information about vertebral disks compared to conventional CT. • Dual-energy computed tomography can be used as an alternative imaging modality for patients unwilling or unable to undergo MRI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6610270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66102702019-07-19 Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography Pumberger, Matthias Fuchs, Michael Engelhard, Nils Hermann, Kay Geert Putzier, Michael Makowski, Marcus R. Hamm, Bernd Diekhoff, Torsten Eur Radiol Musculoskeletal OBJECTIVES: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the standard of reference, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in assessing disk injuries in patients aged more than 50 years with vertebral fractures. METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the local ethics committee (EA1/372/14), and all patients gave written informed consent. Patients with suspected fractures underwent spinal DECTs and MRIs. Three readers scored DECT collagen maps for the presence or absence of disk injuries and also scored MR images according to the Sander classification (0–3). Only disks at risk (target disks) were included in the analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Fleiss’s κ was used to evaluate interrater agreement. Attenuation, in Hounsfield units, was compared between affected and unaffected disks in DECT. RESULTS: Analyzing 295 disks in 67 patients, DECT was both sensitive (0.85) and specific (0.75). Sensitivity varied with the severity of disk damage, as assessed using the Sander scale (grade 1, 0.80; 2, 0.85; and 3, 0.98). Fleiss’s κ was 0.41 for MRI and 0.51 for DECT. In the DECT collagen maps, attenuation was lower in injured disks compared to that in normal disks (80.3 ± 35.2 vs. 97.9 ± 41.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional CT, DECT collagen maps can yield more diagnostic information, allowing identification of disk injuries in elderly patients with vertebral fractures. KEY POINTS: • Dual-energy computed tomography allows vertebral disk injuries to be detected in elderly patients with vertebral fractures. • Dual-energy computed tomography yields more diagnostic information about vertebral disks compared to conventional CT. • Dual-energy computed tomography can be used as an alternative imaging modality for patients unwilling or unable to undergo MRI. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-01-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6610270/ /pubmed/30649597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal
Pumberger, Matthias
Fuchs, Michael
Engelhard, Nils
Hermann, Kay Geert
Putzier, Michael
Makowski, Marcus R.
Hamm, Bernd
Diekhoff, Torsten
Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography
title Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography
title_full Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography
title_fullStr Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography
title_short Disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography
title_sort disk injury in patients with vertebral fractures—a prospective diagnostic accuracy study using dual-energy computed tomography
topic Musculoskeletal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30649597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5963-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pumbergermatthias diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT fuchsmichael diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT engelhardnils diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT hermannkaygeert diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT putziermichael diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT makowskimarcusr diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT hammbernd diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography
AT diekhofftorsten diskinjuryinpatientswithvertebralfracturesaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudyusingdualenergycomputedtomography