Cargando…
Novelty Before or After Word Learning Does Not Affect Subsequent Memory Performance
In humans, exposure to novel images and exploration of novel virtual environments before the encoding of words improved subsequent memory performance. Animal studies revealed similar effects of novelty, both before and after learning, and could show that hippocampus-dependent dopaminergic neuromodul...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01379 |
_version_ | 1783432478762991616 |
---|---|
author | Biel, Davina Bunzeck, Nico |
author_facet | Biel, Davina Bunzeck, Nico |
author_sort | Biel, Davina |
collection | PubMed |
description | In humans, exposure to novel images and exploration of novel virtual environments before the encoding of words improved subsequent memory performance. Animal studies revealed similar effects of novelty, both before and after learning, and could show that hippocampus-dependent dopaminergic neuromodulation plays an important role. Here, we further investigated the effects of novelty on long-term memory in humans using a novel paradigm employing short sequences of nature movies presented either before or at two time points after learning of unrelated words. Since novelty processing is associated with a release of dopamine into the hippocampus, we hypothesized that novelty exposure primarily affects hippocampus-dependent memory (i.e., recollection) but not hippocampus-independent memory (i.e., familiarity). We tested 182 healthy human subjects in three experiments including a word-learning task followed by a 1-day delayed recognition task. Importantly, participants were exposed to novel (NOV) or familiar movies (FAM) at three time points: (experiment 1) directly after encoding of the word list, (experiment 2) 15 min after encoding, (experiment 3) 15 min prior to encoding. As expected, novel movies were perceived as more interesting and led to better mood. During word recognition, reaction times were faster for remember as compared to familiarity responses in all three experiments, but this effect was not modulated by novelty. In contrast to our main hypothesis, there was no effect of novelty – before or after encoding – on subsequent word recognition, including recollection and familiarity scores. Therefore, an exposure to novel movies without an active task does not affect hippocampus-dependent and hippocampus-independent long-term recognition memory for words in humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6610293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66102932019-07-17 Novelty Before or After Word Learning Does Not Affect Subsequent Memory Performance Biel, Davina Bunzeck, Nico Front Psychol Psychology In humans, exposure to novel images and exploration of novel virtual environments before the encoding of words improved subsequent memory performance. Animal studies revealed similar effects of novelty, both before and after learning, and could show that hippocampus-dependent dopaminergic neuromodulation plays an important role. Here, we further investigated the effects of novelty on long-term memory in humans using a novel paradigm employing short sequences of nature movies presented either before or at two time points after learning of unrelated words. Since novelty processing is associated with a release of dopamine into the hippocampus, we hypothesized that novelty exposure primarily affects hippocampus-dependent memory (i.e., recollection) but not hippocampus-independent memory (i.e., familiarity). We tested 182 healthy human subjects in three experiments including a word-learning task followed by a 1-day delayed recognition task. Importantly, participants were exposed to novel (NOV) or familiar movies (FAM) at three time points: (experiment 1) directly after encoding of the word list, (experiment 2) 15 min after encoding, (experiment 3) 15 min prior to encoding. As expected, novel movies were perceived as more interesting and led to better mood. During word recognition, reaction times were faster for remember as compared to familiarity responses in all three experiments, but this effect was not modulated by novelty. In contrast to our main hypothesis, there was no effect of novelty – before or after encoding – on subsequent word recognition, including recollection and familiarity scores. Therefore, an exposure to novel movies without an active task does not affect hippocampus-dependent and hippocampus-independent long-term recognition memory for words in humans. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6610293/ /pubmed/31316414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01379 Text en Copyright © 2019 Biel and Bunzeck. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Biel, Davina Bunzeck, Nico Novelty Before or After Word Learning Does Not Affect Subsequent Memory Performance |
title | Novelty Before or After Word Learning Does Not Affect Subsequent Memory Performance |
title_full | Novelty Before or After Word Learning Does Not Affect Subsequent Memory Performance |
title_fullStr | Novelty Before or After Word Learning Does Not Affect Subsequent Memory Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Novelty Before or After Word Learning Does Not Affect Subsequent Memory Performance |
title_short | Novelty Before or After Word Learning Does Not Affect Subsequent Memory Performance |
title_sort | novelty before or after word learning does not affect subsequent memory performance |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bieldavina noveltybeforeorafterwordlearningdoesnotaffectsubsequentmemoryperformance AT bunzecknico noveltybeforeorafterwordlearningdoesnotaffectsubsequentmemoryperformance |