Cargando…
Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet
Since the 1990’s, neurolaw is on the rise. At the heart of heated debates lies the recurrent theme of a neuro-revolution of criminal responsibility. However, caution should be observed: the alleged foundations of criminal responsibility (amongst which free will) are often inaccurate and the relative...
Autores principales: | Bigenwald, Ariane, Chambon, Valerian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316418 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01406 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Neuroscience in Youth Criminal Law: Reconsidering the Measure of Punishment in Latin America
por: Llamas, Nicolás Ezequiel, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Neuroscience, criminal responsibility and sentencing in an islamic country: Iran
por: Alimardani, Armin
Publicado: (2018) -
Revolutions in Neuroscience: Tool Development
por: Bickle, John
Publicado: (2016) -
Neuroscience nuance: dissecting the relevance of neuroscience in adjudicating criminal culpability
por: Slobogin, Christopher
Publicado: (2017) -
Responsibility problems for criminal justice
por: Jeppsson, Sofia M. I.
Publicado: (2014)