Cargando…

Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint

PURPOSE: One of the characteristics of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is PSA slope. It is the rate of diminishing PSA marker over time after radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between increasing RT doses and PSA slope as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadpour, Reza Ali, Yazdani- Charati, Jamshid, Faghani, SZahra, Alizadeh, Ahad, Barzegartahamtan, Mohammadreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304057
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7172
_version_ 1783432528360636416
author Mohammadpour, Reza Ali
Yazdani- Charati, Jamshid
Faghani, SZahra
Alizadeh, Ahad
Barzegartahamtan, Mohammadreza
author_facet Mohammadpour, Reza Ali
Yazdani- Charati, Jamshid
Faghani, SZahra
Alizadeh, Ahad
Barzegartahamtan, Mohammadreza
author_sort Mohammadpour, Reza Ali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: One of the characteristics of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is PSA slope. It is the rate of diminishing PSA marker over time after radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between increasing RT doses and PSA slope as a potential surrogate for PC recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on PC patients who were treated by radiotherapy in the Cancer Institute of Iran during 2007–2012. By reviewing the records of these patients, the baseline PSA measurement before treatment (iPSA), Gleason score (GS), clinical T stage (T. stage), and periodic PSA measurements after RT and the total radiation dose received were extracted for each patient separately. We used a Bayesian dose-response model, analysis of variance, Kruskal–Wallis test, Kaplan–Meier product-limit method for analysis. Probability values less 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Based on the D’Amico risk assessment system, 13.34% of patients were classified as “Low Risk”, 51.79% were “Intermediate Risk”, and 34.87% were “High Risk”. In terms of radiation doses, 12.31% of the patients received fewer than 50 Gy, 15.38% received 50 to 69 Gy, 61.03% received 70 Gy, and 11.28% received more than 70 Gy. The PSA values decreased after RT for all dose levels. The slope of PSA changes was negative for 176 of 195 patients. By increasing the dosage of radiation, the PSA decreased but these changes were not statistically significant (p = 0.701) and PSA slope as a surrogate end point cannot met the Prentice’s criteria for PC recurrence. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in the dose-response relationship were not observed when the PSA slope was considered as the response criterion. Therefore, although the absolute value of the PSA decreased with increasing doses of RT, the relationship between PSA slope changes and increasing doses was not clear and cannot be used as a reliable response surrogate endpoint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6610535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66105352019-07-14 Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint Mohammadpour, Reza Ali Yazdani- Charati, Jamshid Faghani, SZahra Alizadeh, Ahad Barzegartahamtan, Mohammadreza PeerJ Oncology PURPOSE: One of the characteristics of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) is PSA slope. It is the rate of diminishing PSA marker over time after radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between increasing RT doses and PSA slope as a potential surrogate for PC recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on PC patients who were treated by radiotherapy in the Cancer Institute of Iran during 2007–2012. By reviewing the records of these patients, the baseline PSA measurement before treatment (iPSA), Gleason score (GS), clinical T stage (T. stage), and periodic PSA measurements after RT and the total radiation dose received were extracted for each patient separately. We used a Bayesian dose-response model, analysis of variance, Kruskal–Wallis test, Kaplan–Meier product-limit method for analysis. Probability values less 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Based on the D’Amico risk assessment system, 13.34% of patients were classified as “Low Risk”, 51.79% were “Intermediate Risk”, and 34.87% were “High Risk”. In terms of radiation doses, 12.31% of the patients received fewer than 50 Gy, 15.38% received 50 to 69 Gy, 61.03% received 70 Gy, and 11.28% received more than 70 Gy. The PSA values decreased after RT for all dose levels. The slope of PSA changes was negative for 176 of 195 patients. By increasing the dosage of radiation, the PSA decreased but these changes were not statistically significant (p = 0.701) and PSA slope as a surrogate end point cannot met the Prentice’s criteria for PC recurrence. CONCLUSION: Significant changes in the dose-response relationship were not observed when the PSA slope was considered as the response criterion. Therefore, although the absolute value of the PSA decreased with increasing doses of RT, the relationship between PSA slope changes and increasing doses was not clear and cannot be used as a reliable response surrogate endpoint. PeerJ Inc. 2019-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6610535/ /pubmed/31304057 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7172 Text en ©2019 Mohammadpour et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Mohammadpour, Reza Ali
Yazdani- Charati, Jamshid
Faghani, SZahra
Alizadeh, Ahad
Barzegartahamtan, Mohammadreza
Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint
title Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint
title_full Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint
title_fullStr Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint
title_full_unstemmed Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint
title_short Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint
title_sort radiation dose-response (a bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of psa slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304057
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7172
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadpourrezaali radiationdoseresponseabayesianmodelintheradiotherapyofthelocalizedprostaticadenocarcinomathereliabilityofpsaslopechangesasaresponsesurrogateendpoint
AT yazdanicharatijamshid radiationdoseresponseabayesianmodelintheradiotherapyofthelocalizedprostaticadenocarcinomathereliabilityofpsaslopechangesasaresponsesurrogateendpoint
AT faghaniszahra radiationdoseresponseabayesianmodelintheradiotherapyofthelocalizedprostaticadenocarcinomathereliabilityofpsaslopechangesasaresponsesurrogateendpoint
AT alizadehahad radiationdoseresponseabayesianmodelintheradiotherapyofthelocalizedprostaticadenocarcinomathereliabilityofpsaslopechangesasaresponsesurrogateendpoint
AT barzegartahamtanmohammadreza radiationdoseresponseabayesianmodelintheradiotherapyofthelocalizedprostaticadenocarcinomathereliabilityofpsaslopechangesasaresponsesurrogateendpoint