Cargando…

Considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining Washington state Health Impact Reviews

BACKGROUND: As part of efforts to expand Health in All Policies (HiAP) in Washington State in the U.S., the Washington State Board of Health (BOH) received statutory authority in 2006 to conduct Health Impact Reviews (HIRs). HIRs analyze the potential impacts of proposed legislation and budget decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollack Porter, Keshia M., Lindberg, Ruth, McInnis-Simoncelli, Arielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7165-7
_version_ 1783432577547239424
author Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
Lindberg, Ruth
McInnis-Simoncelli, Arielle
author_facet Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
Lindberg, Ruth
McInnis-Simoncelli, Arielle
author_sort Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As part of efforts to expand Health in All Policies (HiAP) in Washington State in the U.S., the Washington State Board of Health (BOH) received statutory authority in 2006 to conduct Health Impact Reviews (HIRs). HIRs analyze the potential impacts of proposed legislation and budget decisions on health and health disparities. Public health professionals who are aware of HIRs are interested in adopting a similar process in their states; however, there is limited information about HIRs, how they are perceived, and how they could advance HiAP. METHODS: This research involved a descriptive analysis of a sample of HIRs and semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 17 key informants. For the descriptive analysis, all HIRs requested or completed between January 1, 2007 and April 1, 2016 that had a request form submitted by a legislator or the governor that was available in the BOH’s online database were reviewed. Information was collected on several variables including the bill number and title, sponsor and political affiliation, and the sector to which the bill or budgetary proposal pertained. A purposeful sample of legislators, staff, advocates, and lobbyists who were involved with HIRs during the study period were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Topic coding was used to identify key themes from the qualitative data. RESULTS: During the study period, 20 legislators requested 36 HIRs; 32 HIRs were completed. HIRs were requested for several bill topics, including education (11/36) and labor and employment (9/36). Legislators who requested HIRs felt they provided valuable data on health and health disparities for proposed bills. Individuals who were less supportive of HIRs perceived them as an advocacy or political tool. The main barrier to widespread use of HIRs in Washington was a lack of awareness among legislators. CONCLUSIONS: HIRs are one strategy to advance HiAP for state policy decisions. HIRs are a potentially effective tool for highlighting how legislative proposals and budgets positively and negatively impact health and health disparities. Future efforts should promote awareness and highlight shared benefits of HIRs among legislators and their staff, as well as their scientific integrity, methodological rigor, and objectivity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7165-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6610847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66108472019-07-16 Considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining Washington state Health Impact Reviews Pollack Porter, Keshia M. Lindberg, Ruth McInnis-Simoncelli, Arielle BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: As part of efforts to expand Health in All Policies (HiAP) in Washington State in the U.S., the Washington State Board of Health (BOH) received statutory authority in 2006 to conduct Health Impact Reviews (HIRs). HIRs analyze the potential impacts of proposed legislation and budget decisions on health and health disparities. Public health professionals who are aware of HIRs are interested in adopting a similar process in their states; however, there is limited information about HIRs, how they are perceived, and how they could advance HiAP. METHODS: This research involved a descriptive analysis of a sample of HIRs and semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 17 key informants. For the descriptive analysis, all HIRs requested or completed between January 1, 2007 and April 1, 2016 that had a request form submitted by a legislator or the governor that was available in the BOH’s online database were reviewed. Information was collected on several variables including the bill number and title, sponsor and political affiliation, and the sector to which the bill or budgetary proposal pertained. A purposeful sample of legislators, staff, advocates, and lobbyists who were involved with HIRs during the study period were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Topic coding was used to identify key themes from the qualitative data. RESULTS: During the study period, 20 legislators requested 36 HIRs; 32 HIRs were completed. HIRs were requested for several bill topics, including education (11/36) and labor and employment (9/36). Legislators who requested HIRs felt they provided valuable data on health and health disparities for proposed bills. Individuals who were less supportive of HIRs perceived them as an advocacy or political tool. The main barrier to widespread use of HIRs in Washington was a lack of awareness among legislators. CONCLUSIONS: HIRs are one strategy to advance HiAP for state policy decisions. HIRs are a potentially effective tool for highlighting how legislative proposals and budgets positively and negatively impact health and health disparities. Future efforts should promote awareness and highlight shared benefits of HIRs among legislators and their staff, as well as their scientific integrity, methodological rigor, and objectivity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7165-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6610847/ /pubmed/31269934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7165-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pollack Porter, Keshia M.
Lindberg, Ruth
McInnis-Simoncelli, Arielle
Considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining Washington state Health Impact Reviews
title Considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining Washington state Health Impact Reviews
title_full Considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining Washington state Health Impact Reviews
title_fullStr Considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining Washington state Health Impact Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining Washington state Health Impact Reviews
title_short Considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining Washington state Health Impact Reviews
title_sort considering health and health disparities during state policy formulation: examining washington state health impact reviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7165-7
work_keys_str_mv AT pollackporterkeshiam consideringhealthandhealthdisparitiesduringstatepolicyformulationexaminingwashingtonstatehealthimpactreviews
AT lindbergruth consideringhealthandhealthdisparitiesduringstatepolicyformulationexaminingwashingtonstatehealthimpactreviews
AT mcinnissimoncelliarielle consideringhealthandhealthdisparitiesduringstatepolicyformulationexaminingwashingtonstatehealthimpactreviews