Cargando…
A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive electrophysiological assessment (NIEA) is an evolving area in fetal surveillance and is attracting increasing research interest. There is however, limited data outlining its utility in evaluating intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR). The objective of this study was to car...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9 |
_version_ | 1783432586907877376 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Vinayak Nair, Amrish Warty, Ritesh Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Wallace, Euan Morrison |
author_facet | Smith, Vinayak Nair, Amrish Warty, Ritesh Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Wallace, Euan Morrison |
author_sort | Smith, Vinayak |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-invasive electrophysiological assessment (NIEA) is an evolving area in fetal surveillance and is attracting increasing research interest. There is however, limited data outlining its utility in evaluating intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR). The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review to outline the utility of NIEA parameters in evaluating IUGR. METHODS: A systematic review of peer reviewed literature was performed, searching PUBMED, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE. The outcomes of interest included NIEA parameters [P wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, T/QRS ratio, short term variability (STV) and long term variability (LTV)] and a descriptive summary of relevant studies as well. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified as suitable for inclusion. The utility of NIEA parameters were investigated in tabular form. In particular, QRS and QT duration, T/QRS ratio, STV and PRSA analysis displayed utility and merit further consideration in evaluating for IUGR. Issues identified in the review were in relation to variances in definition of IUGR, small sample sizes and the lack of technological consistency across studies. CONCLUSION: NIEA shows promise as an adjunct surveillance tool in fetal diagnostics for IUGR. Larger prospective studies should be directed towards establishing reliable parameters with a focus on uniformity of IUGR definition, technological consistency and the individualisation of NIEA parameters. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6610904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66109042019-07-16 A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction Smith, Vinayak Nair, Amrish Warty, Ritesh Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Wallace, Euan Morrison BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-invasive electrophysiological assessment (NIEA) is an evolving area in fetal surveillance and is attracting increasing research interest. There is however, limited data outlining its utility in evaluating intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR). The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review to outline the utility of NIEA parameters in evaluating IUGR. METHODS: A systematic review of peer reviewed literature was performed, searching PUBMED, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE. The outcomes of interest included NIEA parameters [P wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, T/QRS ratio, short term variability (STV) and long term variability (LTV)] and a descriptive summary of relevant studies as well. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified as suitable for inclusion. The utility of NIEA parameters were investigated in tabular form. In particular, QRS and QT duration, T/QRS ratio, STV and PRSA analysis displayed utility and merit further consideration in evaluating for IUGR. Issues identified in the review were in relation to variances in definition of IUGR, small sample sizes and the lack of technological consistency across studies. CONCLUSION: NIEA shows promise as an adjunct surveillance tool in fetal diagnostics for IUGR. Larger prospective studies should be directed towards establishing reliable parameters with a focus on uniformity of IUGR definition, technological consistency and the individualisation of NIEA parameters. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6610904/ /pubmed/31277600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Smith, Vinayak Nair, Amrish Warty, Ritesh Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Wallace, Euan Morrison A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction |
title | A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction |
title_full | A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction |
title_fullStr | A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction |
title_short | A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction |
title_sort | systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithvinayak asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT nairamrish asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT wartyritesh asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT sursasjoelarun asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT dasilvacostafabricio asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT wallaceeuanmorrison asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT smithvinayak systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT nairamrish systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT wartyritesh systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT sursasjoelarun systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT dasilvacostafabricio systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction AT wallaceeuanmorrison systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction |