Cargando…

A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive electrophysiological assessment (NIEA) is an evolving area in fetal surveillance and is attracting increasing research interest. There is however, limited data outlining its utility in evaluating intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR). The objective of this study was to car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Vinayak, Nair, Amrish, Warty, Ritesh, Sursas, Joel Arun, da Silva Costa, Fabricio, Wallace, Euan Morrison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9
_version_ 1783432586907877376
author Smith, Vinayak
Nair, Amrish
Warty, Ritesh
Sursas, Joel Arun
da Silva Costa, Fabricio
Wallace, Euan Morrison
author_facet Smith, Vinayak
Nair, Amrish
Warty, Ritesh
Sursas, Joel Arun
da Silva Costa, Fabricio
Wallace, Euan Morrison
author_sort Smith, Vinayak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-invasive electrophysiological assessment (NIEA) is an evolving area in fetal surveillance and is attracting increasing research interest. There is however, limited data outlining its utility in evaluating intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR). The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review to outline the utility of NIEA parameters in evaluating IUGR. METHODS: A systematic review of peer reviewed literature was performed, searching PUBMED, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE. The outcomes of interest included NIEA parameters [P wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, T/QRS ratio, short term variability (STV) and long term variability (LTV)] and a descriptive summary of relevant studies as well. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified as suitable for inclusion. The utility of NIEA parameters were investigated in tabular form. In particular, QRS and QT duration, T/QRS ratio, STV and PRSA analysis displayed utility and merit further consideration in evaluating for IUGR. Issues identified in the review were in relation to variances in definition of IUGR, small sample sizes and the lack of technological consistency across studies. CONCLUSION: NIEA shows promise as an adjunct surveillance tool in fetal diagnostics for IUGR. Larger prospective studies should be directed towards establishing reliable parameters with a focus on uniformity of IUGR definition, technological consistency and the individualisation of NIEA parameters. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6610904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66109042019-07-16 A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction Smith, Vinayak Nair, Amrish Warty, Ritesh Sursas, Joel Arun da Silva Costa, Fabricio Wallace, Euan Morrison BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-invasive electrophysiological assessment (NIEA) is an evolving area in fetal surveillance and is attracting increasing research interest. There is however, limited data outlining its utility in evaluating intra uterine growth restriction (IUGR). The objective of this study was to carry out a systematic review to outline the utility of NIEA parameters in evaluating IUGR. METHODS: A systematic review of peer reviewed literature was performed, searching PUBMED, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE. The outcomes of interest included NIEA parameters [P wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, T/QRS ratio, short term variability (STV) and long term variability (LTV)] and a descriptive summary of relevant studies as well. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were identified as suitable for inclusion. The utility of NIEA parameters were investigated in tabular form. In particular, QRS and QT duration, T/QRS ratio, STV and PRSA analysis displayed utility and merit further consideration in evaluating for IUGR. Issues identified in the review were in relation to variances in definition of IUGR, small sample sizes and the lack of technological consistency across studies. CONCLUSION: NIEA shows promise as an adjunct surveillance tool in fetal diagnostics for IUGR. Larger prospective studies should be directed towards establishing reliable parameters with a focus on uniformity of IUGR definition, technological consistency and the individualisation of NIEA parameters. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6610904/ /pubmed/31277600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Vinayak
Nair, Amrish
Warty, Ritesh
Sursas, Joel Arun
da Silva Costa, Fabricio
Wallace, Euan Morrison
A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction
title A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction
title_full A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction
title_fullStr A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction
title_short A systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction
title_sort systematic review on the utility of non-invasive electrophysiological assessment in evaluating for intra uterine growth restriction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2357-9
work_keys_str_mv AT smithvinayak asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT nairamrish asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT wartyritesh asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT sursasjoelarun asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT dasilvacostafabricio asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT wallaceeuanmorrison asystematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT smithvinayak systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT nairamrish systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT wartyritesh systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT sursasjoelarun systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT dasilvacostafabricio systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction
AT wallaceeuanmorrison systematicreviewontheutilityofnoninvasiveelectrophysiologicalassessmentinevaluatingforintrauterinegrowthrestriction