Cargando…
A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
BACKGROUND: In the present study, we compare the LMA-Protector™ and the i-gel™ in terms of adequacy of the airway seal, insertion time, ease and accuracy of insertion, and the incidence of postoperative sore throat. METHODS: In 110 anesthetized and paralyzed adult patients, the i-gel™ (n = 55) or th...
Autores principales: | Chang, Jee-Eun, Kim, Hyerim, Lee, Jung-Man, Min, Seong-Won, Won, Dongwook, Jun, Kwanghoon, Hwang, Jin-Young |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31272379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0785-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children
por: Kim, Hyuk, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients
por: Chan, Weng Ken, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA-ProSeal in different head and neck positions in anaesthetized and paralyzed patients; A prospective randomized study
por: Kerai, Sukhyanti, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of Size 2.5 i-gel™ with Proseal LMA™ in Anaesthetised, Paralyzed Children Undergoing Elective Surgery
por: Mitra, Subhro, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Comparison of i–gel™ and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients
por: Reza Hashemian, Seyed Mohammad, et al.
Publicado: (2014)