Cargando…
Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Monetary incentive is often used to increase response rate in smokers’ survey, but such effect of prepaid and promised incentives in a follow-up survey is unknown. We compared the effect of different incentive schemes on the consent and retention rates in a follow-up survey of adult ciga...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31272393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0786-9 |
_version_ | 1783432594647416832 |
---|---|
author | Cheung, Yee Tak Derek Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Ho, Sai Yin Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Lam, Tai Hing |
author_facet | Cheung, Yee Tak Derek Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Ho, Sai Yin Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Lam, Tai Hing |
author_sort | Cheung, Yee Tak Derek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Monetary incentive is often used to increase response rate in smokers’ survey, but such effect of prepaid and promised incentives in a follow-up survey is unknown. We compared the effect of different incentive schemes on the consent and retention rates in a follow-up survey of adult cigarette smokers. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Hong Kong, China. Smokers who completed a non-incentivized baseline telephone smoking survey were invited to a 3-month follow-up, with randomization into (1) the control group (no incentive), (2) a promised HK$100 (US$12.8) incentive upon completion, (3) a promised HK$200 (US$25.6) incentive upon completion, or (4) a prepaid HK$100 incentive plus another promised HK$100 incentive (“mixed incentive”). Crude risk ratios from log-binomial regression models were used to assess if the 3 incentive schemes predicted higher rates of consent at baseline or retention at 3-month than no incentive. RESULTS: In total, 1246 smokers were enrolled. The overall consent and retention rates were 37.1 and 23.0%, respectively. Both rates generally increased with the incentive amount and offer of prepaid incentive. The mixed incentive scheme marginally increased the retention rate versus no incentive (26.8% vs 20.3%; risk ratio (RR) = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.00–1.76; P = 0.053), but not the consent rate (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.93–1.38; P = 0.22). Among the consented participants, approximately 50% in the mixed incentive group received the mailed prepaid incentive, who achieved a higher retention rate than the group without incentives (82.8% vs 56.1%; RR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.21–1.80; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The mixed incentive scheme combining the prepaid and promised incentive was effective to increase the follow-up retention rate by 48%. We recommend this mixed incentive scheme to increase the follow-up retention rate. More efficient methods of delivering the incentive are needed to maximize its effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. Clinical Trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov, retrospectively registered, reference number: NCT03297866). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6610937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66109372019-07-16 Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial Cheung, Yee Tak Derek Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Ho, Sai Yin Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Lam, Tai Hing BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Monetary incentive is often used to increase response rate in smokers’ survey, but such effect of prepaid and promised incentives in a follow-up survey is unknown. We compared the effect of different incentive schemes on the consent and retention rates in a follow-up survey of adult cigarette smokers. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Hong Kong, China. Smokers who completed a non-incentivized baseline telephone smoking survey were invited to a 3-month follow-up, with randomization into (1) the control group (no incentive), (2) a promised HK$100 (US$12.8) incentive upon completion, (3) a promised HK$200 (US$25.6) incentive upon completion, or (4) a prepaid HK$100 incentive plus another promised HK$100 incentive (“mixed incentive”). Crude risk ratios from log-binomial regression models were used to assess if the 3 incentive schemes predicted higher rates of consent at baseline or retention at 3-month than no incentive. RESULTS: In total, 1246 smokers were enrolled. The overall consent and retention rates were 37.1 and 23.0%, respectively. Both rates generally increased with the incentive amount and offer of prepaid incentive. The mixed incentive scheme marginally increased the retention rate versus no incentive (26.8% vs 20.3%; risk ratio (RR) = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.00–1.76; P = 0.053), but not the consent rate (RR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.93–1.38; P = 0.22). Among the consented participants, approximately 50% in the mixed incentive group received the mailed prepaid incentive, who achieved a higher retention rate than the group without incentives (82.8% vs 56.1%; RR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.21–1.80; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The mixed incentive scheme combining the prepaid and promised incentive was effective to increase the follow-up retention rate by 48%. We recommend this mixed incentive scheme to increase the follow-up retention rate. More efficient methods of delivering the incentive are needed to maximize its effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. Clinical Trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov, retrospectively registered, reference number: NCT03297866). BioMed Central 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6610937/ /pubmed/31272393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0786-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cheung, Yee Tak Derek Weng, Xue Wang, Man Ping Ho, Sai Yin Kwong, Antonio Cho Shing Lai, Vienna Wai Yin Lam, Tai Hing Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31272393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0786-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheungyeetakderek effectofprepaidandpromisedfinancialincentiveonfollowupsurveyresponseincigarettesmokersarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wengxue effectofprepaidandpromisedfinancialincentiveonfollowupsurveyresponseincigarettesmokersarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangmanping effectofprepaidandpromisedfinancialincentiveonfollowupsurveyresponseincigarettesmokersarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hosaiyin effectofprepaidandpromisedfinancialincentiveonfollowupsurveyresponseincigarettesmokersarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kwongantoniochoshing effectofprepaidandpromisedfinancialincentiveonfollowupsurveyresponseincigarettesmokersarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT laiviennawaiyin effectofprepaidandpromisedfinancialincentiveonfollowupsurveyresponseincigarettesmokersarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lamtaihing effectofprepaidandpromisedfinancialincentiveonfollowupsurveyresponseincigarettesmokersarandomizedcontrolledtrial |