Cargando…

Development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations

BACKGROUND: Information exchange between physician and patient is crucial to achieve patient involvement, shared decision making and treatment adherence. No reliable method exists for measuring how much information physicians provide in a complex, unscripted medical conversation, nor how much of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordfalk, J. M., Gulbrandsen, P., Gerwing, J., Nylenna, M., Menichetti, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31272386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0788-7
_version_ 1783432605703602176
author Nordfalk, J. M.
Gulbrandsen, P.
Gerwing, J.
Nylenna, M.
Menichetti, J.
author_facet Nordfalk, J. M.
Gulbrandsen, P.
Gerwing, J.
Nylenna, M.
Menichetti, J.
author_sort Nordfalk, J. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Information exchange between physician and patient is crucial to achieve patient involvement, shared decision making and treatment adherence. No reliable method exists for measuring how much information physicians provide in a complex, unscripted medical conversation, nor how much of this information patients recall. This study aims to fill this gap by developing a measurement system designed to compare complex orally provided information to patient recall. METHODS: The development of the complex information transfer measurement system required nine methodological steps. Core activities were data collection, definition of information units and the first draft of a codebook, refinement through independent coding and consensus, and reliability testing. Videotapes of physician-patient consultations based on a standardized scenario and post-consultation interviews with patients constituted the data. The codebook was developed from verbatim transcriptions of the videotapes. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using a random selection of 10% of the statements in the transcriptions. RESULTS: Thirtyfour transcriptions of visits and interviews were collected. We developed a set of rules for defining a single unit of information, defined detailed criteria for exclusion and inclusion of relevant units of information, and outlined systematic counting procedures. In the refinement phase, we established a system for comparing the information provided by the physician with what the patient recalled. While linguistic and conceptual issues arose during the process, coders still achieved good inter-rater reliability, with intra-class correlation for patient recall: 0.723, and for doctors: 0.761. A full codebook is available as an appendix. CONCLUSIONS: A measurement system specifically aimed at quantifying complex unscripted information exchange may be a useful addition to the tools for evaluating the results of health communication training and randomized controlled trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0788-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6610985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66109852019-07-16 Development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations Nordfalk, J. M. Gulbrandsen, P. Gerwing, J. Nylenna, M. Menichetti, J. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Information exchange between physician and patient is crucial to achieve patient involvement, shared decision making and treatment adherence. No reliable method exists for measuring how much information physicians provide in a complex, unscripted medical conversation, nor how much of this information patients recall. This study aims to fill this gap by developing a measurement system designed to compare complex orally provided information to patient recall. METHODS: The development of the complex information transfer measurement system required nine methodological steps. Core activities were data collection, definition of information units and the first draft of a codebook, refinement through independent coding and consensus, and reliability testing. Videotapes of physician-patient consultations based on a standardized scenario and post-consultation interviews with patients constituted the data. The codebook was developed from verbatim transcriptions of the videotapes. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using a random selection of 10% of the statements in the transcriptions. RESULTS: Thirtyfour transcriptions of visits and interviews were collected. We developed a set of rules for defining a single unit of information, defined detailed criteria for exclusion and inclusion of relevant units of information, and outlined systematic counting procedures. In the refinement phase, we established a system for comparing the information provided by the physician with what the patient recalled. While linguistic and conceptual issues arose during the process, coders still achieved good inter-rater reliability, with intra-class correlation for patient recall: 0.723, and for doctors: 0.761. A full codebook is available as an appendix. CONCLUSIONS: A measurement system specifically aimed at quantifying complex unscripted information exchange may be a useful addition to the tools for evaluating the results of health communication training and randomized controlled trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0788-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6610985/ /pubmed/31272386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0788-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nordfalk, J. M.
Gulbrandsen, P.
Gerwing, J.
Nylenna, M.
Menichetti, J.
Development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations
title Development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations
title_full Development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations
title_fullStr Development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations
title_full_unstemmed Development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations
title_short Development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations
title_sort development of a measurement system for complex oral information transfer in medical consultations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31272386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0788-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nordfalkjm developmentofameasurementsystemforcomplexoralinformationtransferinmedicalconsultations
AT gulbrandsenp developmentofameasurementsystemforcomplexoralinformationtransferinmedicalconsultations
AT gerwingj developmentofameasurementsystemforcomplexoralinformationtransferinmedicalconsultations
AT nylennam developmentofameasurementsystemforcomplexoralinformationtransferinmedicalconsultations
AT menichettij developmentofameasurementsystemforcomplexoralinformationtransferinmedicalconsultations