Cargando…

Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Localization of small and/or deep pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic exploration is paramount to minimize the likelihood of unplanned conversion to thoracotomy. As far as the percutaneous approach is concerned, the most common workflow consists of preoperative computed tomography (PO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chao, Yin-Kai, Pan, Kuang-Tse, Wen, Chih-Tsung, Fang, Hsin-Yueh, Hsieh, Ming-Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31272483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3532-z
_version_ 1783432608279953408
author Chao, Yin-Kai
Pan, Kuang-Tse
Wen, Chih-Tsung
Fang, Hsin-Yueh
Hsieh, Ming-Ju
author_facet Chao, Yin-Kai
Pan, Kuang-Tse
Wen, Chih-Tsung
Fang, Hsin-Yueh
Hsieh, Ming-Ju
author_sort Chao, Yin-Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Localization of small and/or deep pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic exploration is paramount to minimize the likelihood of unplanned conversion to thoracotomy. As far as the percutaneous approach is concerned, the most common workflow consists of preoperative computed tomography (POCT) imaging-guided tumor marking (performed in an interventional CT suite) followed by their removal in an operating room (OR). However, the advent of hybrid ORs has allowed intraoperative computed tomography (IOCT)-guided lesion localization. This single center, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of IOCT versus POCT. METHODS/DESIGN: The study sample will consist of patients presenting with small and/or deep pulmonary nodules who will be randomly allocated to either POCT or IOCT. The time required to complete lesion localization will be the primary efficacy outcome. The following parameters will serve as secondary endpoints: rate of successful targeting during localization and in the operating field, time at risk, operating time, length of time under anesthesia, global OR utilization time, complication (pneumothorax and hemorrhage) rates, and radiation exposure. DISCUSSION: Owing to the increased availability of HORs, our data will be crucial to clarify the feasibility and safety of IOCT versus the traditional POCT approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395964. Registered on October 8, 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3532-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6610996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66109962019-07-16 Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial Chao, Yin-Kai Pan, Kuang-Tse Wen, Chih-Tsung Fang, Hsin-Yueh Hsieh, Ming-Ju Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Localization of small and/or deep pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic exploration is paramount to minimize the likelihood of unplanned conversion to thoracotomy. As far as the percutaneous approach is concerned, the most common workflow consists of preoperative computed tomography (POCT) imaging-guided tumor marking (performed in an interventional CT suite) followed by their removal in an operating room (OR). However, the advent of hybrid ORs has allowed intraoperative computed tomography (IOCT)-guided lesion localization. This single center, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of IOCT versus POCT. METHODS/DESIGN: The study sample will consist of patients presenting with small and/or deep pulmonary nodules who will be randomly allocated to either POCT or IOCT. The time required to complete lesion localization will be the primary efficacy outcome. The following parameters will serve as secondary endpoints: rate of successful targeting during localization and in the operating field, time at risk, operating time, length of time under anesthesia, global OR utilization time, complication (pneumothorax and hemorrhage) rates, and radiation exposure. DISCUSSION: Owing to the increased availability of HORs, our data will be crucial to clarify the feasibility and safety of IOCT versus the traditional POCT approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03395964. Registered on October 8, 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3532-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6610996/ /pubmed/31272483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3532-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chao, Yin-Kai
Pan, Kuang-Tse
Wen, Chih-Tsung
Fang, Hsin-Yueh
Hsieh, Ming-Ju
Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial
title Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Preoperative CT versus intraoperative hybrid DynaCT imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort preoperative ct versus intraoperative hybrid dynact imaging for localization of small pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6610996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31272483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3532-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chaoyinkai preoperativectversusintraoperativehybriddynactimagingforlocalizationofsmallpulmonarynodulesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pankuangtse preoperativectversusintraoperativehybriddynactimagingforlocalizationofsmallpulmonarynodulesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wenchihtsung preoperativectversusintraoperativehybriddynactimagingforlocalizationofsmallpulmonarynodulesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fanghsinyueh preoperativectversusintraoperativehybriddynactimagingforlocalizationofsmallpulmonarynodulesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hsiehmingju preoperativectversusintraoperativehybriddynactimagingforlocalizationofsmallpulmonarynodulesarandomizedcontrolledtrial