Cargando…

Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to analyze preclinical and clinical data on the performance of the currently US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved microwave ablation (MWA) systems. METHODS: A review of the literature, published between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiter, Simeon J. S., Heerink, Wouter J., de Jong, Koert P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30506218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5842-z
_version_ 1783432623189655552
author Ruiter, Simeon J. S.
Heerink, Wouter J.
de Jong, Koert P.
author_facet Ruiter, Simeon J. S.
Heerink, Wouter J.
de Jong, Koert P.
author_sort Ruiter, Simeon J. S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to analyze preclinical and clinical data on the performance of the currently US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved microwave ablation (MWA) systems. METHODS: A review of the literature, published between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, on seven FDA-approved MWA systems, was conducted. Ratio of ablation zone volume to applied energy R(AZ:E) and sphericity indices were calculated for ex vivo and in vivo experiments. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies with ex vivo, in vivo, and clinical data were summarized. In total, 14 studies reporting data on ablation zone volume and applied energy were included for comparison R(AZ:E). A significant correlation between volume and energy was found for the ex vivo experiments (r = 0.85, p < 0.001) in contrast to the in vivo experiments (r = 0.54, p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Manufacturers’ algorithms on microwave ablation zone sizes are based on preclinical animal experiments with normal liver parenchyma. Clinical data reporting on ablation zone volume in relation to applied energy and sphericity index during MWA are scarce and require more adequate reporting of MWA data. KEY POINTS: • Clinical data reporting on the ablation zone volume in relation to applied energy during microwave ablation are scarce. • Manufacturers’ algorithms on microwave ablation zone sizes are based on preclinical animal experiments with normal liver parenchyma. • Preclinical data do not predict actual clinical ablation zone volumes in patients with liver tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6611060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66110602019-07-19 Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems Ruiter, Simeon J. S. Heerink, Wouter J. de Jong, Koert P. Eur Radiol Interventional OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study is to analyze preclinical and clinical data on the performance of the currently US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved microwave ablation (MWA) systems. METHODS: A review of the literature, published between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, on seven FDA-approved MWA systems, was conducted. Ratio of ablation zone volume to applied energy R(AZ:E) and sphericity indices were calculated for ex vivo and in vivo experiments. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies with ex vivo, in vivo, and clinical data were summarized. In total, 14 studies reporting data on ablation zone volume and applied energy were included for comparison R(AZ:E). A significant correlation between volume and energy was found for the ex vivo experiments (r = 0.85, p < 0.001) in contrast to the in vivo experiments (r = 0.54, p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Manufacturers’ algorithms on microwave ablation zone sizes are based on preclinical animal experiments with normal liver parenchyma. Clinical data reporting on ablation zone volume in relation to applied energy and sphericity index during MWA are scarce and require more adequate reporting of MWA data. KEY POINTS: • Clinical data reporting on the ablation zone volume in relation to applied energy during microwave ablation are scarce. • Manufacturers’ algorithms on microwave ablation zone sizes are based on preclinical animal experiments with normal liver parenchyma. • Preclinical data do not predict actual clinical ablation zone volumes in patients with liver tumors. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-30 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6611060/ /pubmed/30506218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5842-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Interventional
Ruiter, Simeon J. S.
Heerink, Wouter J.
de Jong, Koert P.
Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems
title Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems
title_full Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems
title_fullStr Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems
title_full_unstemmed Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems
title_short Liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various FDA-approved systems
title_sort liver microwave ablation: a systematic review of various fda-approved systems
topic Interventional
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30506218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5842-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ruitersimeonjs livermicrowaveablationasystematicreviewofvariousfdaapprovedsystems
AT heerinkwouterj livermicrowaveablationasystematicreviewofvariousfdaapprovedsystems
AT dejongkoertp livermicrowaveablationasystematicreviewofvariousfdaapprovedsystems