Cargando…
A realist review of community engagement with health research
Introduction: Community engagement is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of global health. Recent years have seen an expansion of community engagement activities linked to health research, but debates and inconsistencies remain about the aims of different types of engagement, mechanisms un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289754 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15298.2 |
_version_ | 1783432632884789248 |
---|---|
author | Adhikari, Bipin Vincent, Robin Wong, Geoff Duddy, Claire Richardson, Emma Lavery, James V. Molyneux, Sassy |
author_facet | Adhikari, Bipin Vincent, Robin Wong, Geoff Duddy, Claire Richardson, Emma Lavery, James V. Molyneux, Sassy |
author_sort | Adhikari, Bipin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Community engagement is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of global health. Recent years have seen an expansion of community engagement activities linked to health research, but debates and inconsistencies remain about the aims of different types of engagement, mechanisms underpinning their implementation and impact, and influential contextual factors. Greater commitment to and consistency around community engagement by health research programs, implementers and funders requires a more coherent evidence base. This realist review is designed to improve our understanding of how and why community engagement contributes to intended and unintended outcomes (including research and ethical outcomes) in different contexts. Given the breadth and diversity of the literature on community engagement in health research, the review will initially focus on malaria research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and draw on wider global health literature where needed. Methods and analysis: Community engagement in practice is often a complex set of interventions. We will conduct a realist review – a theory driven approach to evidence synthesis – to provide explanations for how and why community engagement with health research produces the pattern of outcomes observed across different contexts of application. We will consolidate evidence from a range of documents, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies. The review will follow several stages: devising an initial programme theory, searching evidence, selecting appropriate documents, extracting data, synthesizing and refining the programme theory, and reiteration of these steps as needed. Ethics and dissemination: A formal ethics review is not required for this literature review. Findings will be disseminated in a peer reviewed journal, through national and international conferences, and through a set of short briefings tailored for audiences with an interest in community engagement. Outputs and presentations will be informed by and feed into our network of community engagement experts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019125687 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6611131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66111312019-07-08 A realist review of community engagement with health research Adhikari, Bipin Vincent, Robin Wong, Geoff Duddy, Claire Richardson, Emma Lavery, James V. Molyneux, Sassy Wellcome Open Res Study Protocol Introduction: Community engagement is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of global health. Recent years have seen an expansion of community engagement activities linked to health research, but debates and inconsistencies remain about the aims of different types of engagement, mechanisms underpinning their implementation and impact, and influential contextual factors. Greater commitment to and consistency around community engagement by health research programs, implementers and funders requires a more coherent evidence base. This realist review is designed to improve our understanding of how and why community engagement contributes to intended and unintended outcomes (including research and ethical outcomes) in different contexts. Given the breadth and diversity of the literature on community engagement in health research, the review will initially focus on malaria research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and draw on wider global health literature where needed. Methods and analysis: Community engagement in practice is often a complex set of interventions. We will conduct a realist review – a theory driven approach to evidence synthesis – to provide explanations for how and why community engagement with health research produces the pattern of outcomes observed across different contexts of application. We will consolidate evidence from a range of documents, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies. The review will follow several stages: devising an initial programme theory, searching evidence, selecting appropriate documents, extracting data, synthesizing and refining the programme theory, and reiteration of these steps as needed. Ethics and dissemination: A formal ethics review is not required for this literature review. Findings will be disseminated in a peer reviewed journal, through national and international conferences, and through a set of short briefings tailored for audiences with an interest in community engagement. Outputs and presentations will be informed by and feed into our network of community engagement experts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019125687 F1000 Research Limited 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6611131/ /pubmed/31289754 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15298.2 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Adhikari B et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Adhikari, Bipin Vincent, Robin Wong, Geoff Duddy, Claire Richardson, Emma Lavery, James V. Molyneux, Sassy A realist review of community engagement with health research |
title | A realist review of community engagement with health research |
title_full | A realist review of community engagement with health research |
title_fullStr | A realist review of community engagement with health research |
title_full_unstemmed | A realist review of community engagement with health research |
title_short | A realist review of community engagement with health research |
title_sort | realist review of community engagement with health research |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289754 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15298.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adhikaribipin arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT vincentrobin arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT wonggeoff arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT duddyclaire arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT richardsonemma arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT laveryjamesv arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT molyneuxsassy arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT adhikaribipin realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT vincentrobin realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT wonggeoff realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT duddyclaire realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT richardsonemma realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT laveryjamesv realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch AT molyneuxsassy realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch |