Cargando…

A realist review of community engagement with health research

Introduction: Community engagement is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of global health. Recent years have seen an expansion of community engagement activities linked to health research, but debates and inconsistencies remain about the aims of different types of engagement, mechanisms un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adhikari, Bipin, Vincent, Robin, Wong, Geoff, Duddy, Claire, Richardson, Emma, Lavery, James V., Molyneux, Sassy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289754
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15298.2
_version_ 1783432632884789248
author Adhikari, Bipin
Vincent, Robin
Wong, Geoff
Duddy, Claire
Richardson, Emma
Lavery, James V.
Molyneux, Sassy
author_facet Adhikari, Bipin
Vincent, Robin
Wong, Geoff
Duddy, Claire
Richardson, Emma
Lavery, James V.
Molyneux, Sassy
author_sort Adhikari, Bipin
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Community engagement is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of global health. Recent years have seen an expansion of community engagement activities linked to health research, but debates and inconsistencies remain about the aims of different types of engagement, mechanisms underpinning their implementation and impact, and influential contextual factors. Greater commitment to and consistency around community engagement by health research programs, implementers and funders requires a more coherent evidence base. This realist review is designed to improve our understanding of how and why community engagement contributes to intended and unintended outcomes (including research and ethical outcomes) in different contexts. Given the breadth and diversity of the literature on community engagement in health research, the review will initially focus on malaria research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and draw on wider global health literature where needed. Methods and analysis: Community engagement in practice is often a complex set of interventions. We will conduct a realist review – a theory driven approach to evidence synthesis – to provide explanations for how and why community engagement with health research produces the pattern of outcomes observed across different contexts of application. We will consolidate evidence from a range of documents, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies. The review will follow several stages: devising an initial programme theory, searching evidence, selecting appropriate documents, extracting data, synthesizing and refining the programme theory, and reiteration of these steps as needed. Ethics and dissemination: A formal ethics review is not required for this literature review.  Findings will be disseminated in a peer reviewed journal, through national and international conferences, and through a set of short briefings tailored for audiences with an interest in community engagement. Outputs and presentations will be informed by and feed into our network of community engagement experts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019125687
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6611131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66111312019-07-08 A realist review of community engagement with health research Adhikari, Bipin Vincent, Robin Wong, Geoff Duddy, Claire Richardson, Emma Lavery, James V. Molyneux, Sassy Wellcome Open Res Study Protocol Introduction: Community engagement is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of global health. Recent years have seen an expansion of community engagement activities linked to health research, but debates and inconsistencies remain about the aims of different types of engagement, mechanisms underpinning their implementation and impact, and influential contextual factors. Greater commitment to and consistency around community engagement by health research programs, implementers and funders requires a more coherent evidence base. This realist review is designed to improve our understanding of how and why community engagement contributes to intended and unintended outcomes (including research and ethical outcomes) in different contexts. Given the breadth and diversity of the literature on community engagement in health research, the review will initially focus on malaria research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and draw on wider global health literature where needed. Methods and analysis: Community engagement in practice is often a complex set of interventions. We will conduct a realist review – a theory driven approach to evidence synthesis – to provide explanations for how and why community engagement with health research produces the pattern of outcomes observed across different contexts of application. We will consolidate evidence from a range of documents, including qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies. The review will follow several stages: devising an initial programme theory, searching evidence, selecting appropriate documents, extracting data, synthesizing and refining the programme theory, and reiteration of these steps as needed. Ethics and dissemination: A formal ethics review is not required for this literature review.  Findings will be disseminated in a peer reviewed journal, through national and international conferences, and through a set of short briefings tailored for audiences with an interest in community engagement. Outputs and presentations will be informed by and feed into our network of community engagement experts. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019125687 F1000 Research Limited 2019-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6611131/ /pubmed/31289754 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15298.2 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Adhikari B et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Adhikari, Bipin
Vincent, Robin
Wong, Geoff
Duddy, Claire
Richardson, Emma
Lavery, James V.
Molyneux, Sassy
A realist review of community engagement with health research
title A realist review of community engagement with health research
title_full A realist review of community engagement with health research
title_fullStr A realist review of community engagement with health research
title_full_unstemmed A realist review of community engagement with health research
title_short A realist review of community engagement with health research
title_sort realist review of community engagement with health research
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31289754
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15298.2
work_keys_str_mv AT adhikaribipin arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT vincentrobin arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT wonggeoff arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT duddyclaire arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT richardsonemma arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT laveryjamesv arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT molyneuxsassy arealistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT adhikaribipin realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT vincentrobin realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT wonggeoff realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT duddyclaire realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT richardsonemma realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT laveryjamesv realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch
AT molyneuxsassy realistreviewofcommunityengagementwithhealthresearch