Cargando…

Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy

Approximately 50% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients will develop metastasis to the liver. (90)Y selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is an established treatment for metastatic CRC. There is still a fundamental lack of understanding regarding the radiobiology underlying the dose response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Boon Q, Abbott, Elliot M, Able, Sarah, Thompson, James M, Hill, Mark A, Kartsonaki, Christiana, Vallis, Katherine A, Falzone, Nadia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOP Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab23c4
_version_ 1783432651872403456
author Lee, Boon Q
Abbott, Elliot M
Able, Sarah
Thompson, James M
Hill, Mark A
Kartsonaki, Christiana
Vallis, Katherine A
Falzone, Nadia
author_facet Lee, Boon Q
Abbott, Elliot M
Able, Sarah
Thompson, James M
Hill, Mark A
Kartsonaki, Christiana
Vallis, Katherine A
Falzone, Nadia
author_sort Lee, Boon Q
collection PubMed
description Approximately 50% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients will develop metastasis to the liver. (90)Y selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is an established treatment for metastatic CRC. There is still a fundamental lack of understanding regarding the radiobiology underlying the dose response. This study was designed to determine the radiosensitivity of two CRC cell lines (DLD-1 and HT-29) to (90)Y β(−) radiation exposure, and thus the relative effectiveness of (90)Y SIRT in relation to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). A (90)Y-source dish was sandwiched between culture dishes to irradiate DLD-1 or HT-29 cells for a period of 6 d. Cell survival was determined by clonogenic assay. Dose absorbed per (90)Y disintegration was calculated using the PENELOPE Monte Carlo code. PENELOPE simulations were benchmarked against relative dose measurements using EBT3 GAFchromic(™) film. Statistical regression based on the linear-quadratic model was used to determine the radiosensitivity parameters [Image: see text] and [Image: see text] using R. These results were compared to radiosensitivity parameters determined for 6 MV clinical x-rays and (137)Cs γ-ray exposure. Equivalent dose of EBRT in 2 Gy ([Image: see text]) and 10 Gy ([Image: see text]) fractions were derived for (90)Y dose. HT-29 cells were more radioresistant than DLD-1 for all treatment modalities. Radiosensitivity parameters determined for 6 MV x-rays and (137)Cs γ-ray were equivalent for both cell lines. The [Image: see text] ratio for (90)Y β(−)-particle exposure was over an order of magnitude higher than the other two modalities due to protraction of dose delivery. Consequently, an (90)Y SIRT absorbed dose of 60 Gy equates to an [Image: see text] of 28.7 and 54.5 Gy and an [Image: see text] of 17.6 and 19.3 Gy for DLD-1 and HT-29 cell lines, respectively. We derived radiosensitivity parameters for two CRC cell lines exposed to (90)Y β(−)-particles, 6 MV x-rays, and (137)Cs γ-ray irradiation. These radiobiological parameters are critical to understanding the dose response of CRC lesions and ultimately informs the efficacy of (90)Y SIRT relative to other radiation therapy modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6611228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66112282019-07-24 Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy Lee, Boon Q Abbott, Elliot M Able, Sarah Thompson, James M Hill, Mark A Kartsonaki, Christiana Vallis, Katherine A Falzone, Nadia Phys Med Biol Paper Approximately 50% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients will develop metastasis to the liver. (90)Y selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is an established treatment for metastatic CRC. There is still a fundamental lack of understanding regarding the radiobiology underlying the dose response. This study was designed to determine the radiosensitivity of two CRC cell lines (DLD-1 and HT-29) to (90)Y β(−) radiation exposure, and thus the relative effectiveness of (90)Y SIRT in relation to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). A (90)Y-source dish was sandwiched between culture dishes to irradiate DLD-1 or HT-29 cells for a period of 6 d. Cell survival was determined by clonogenic assay. Dose absorbed per (90)Y disintegration was calculated using the PENELOPE Monte Carlo code. PENELOPE simulations were benchmarked against relative dose measurements using EBT3 GAFchromic(™) film. Statistical regression based on the linear-quadratic model was used to determine the radiosensitivity parameters [Image: see text] and [Image: see text] using R. These results were compared to radiosensitivity parameters determined for 6 MV clinical x-rays and (137)Cs γ-ray exposure. Equivalent dose of EBRT in 2 Gy ([Image: see text]) and 10 Gy ([Image: see text]) fractions were derived for (90)Y dose. HT-29 cells were more radioresistant than DLD-1 for all treatment modalities. Radiosensitivity parameters determined for 6 MV x-rays and (137)Cs γ-ray were equivalent for both cell lines. The [Image: see text] ratio for (90)Y β(−)-particle exposure was over an order of magnitude higher than the other two modalities due to protraction of dose delivery. Consequently, an (90)Y SIRT absorbed dose of 60 Gy equates to an [Image: see text] of 28.7 and 54.5 Gy and an [Image: see text] of 17.6 and 19.3 Gy for DLD-1 and HT-29 cell lines, respectively. We derived radiosensitivity parameters for two CRC cell lines exposed to (90)Y β(−)-particles, 6 MV x-rays, and (137)Cs γ-ray irradiation. These radiobiological parameters are critical to understanding the dose response of CRC lesions and ultimately informs the efficacy of (90)Y SIRT relative to other radiation therapy modalities. IOP Publishing 2019-07 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6611228/ /pubmed/31117062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab23c4 Text en © 2019 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) . Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
spellingShingle Paper
Lee, Boon Q
Abbott, Elliot M
Able, Sarah
Thompson, James M
Hill, Mark A
Kartsonaki, Christiana
Vallis, Katherine A
Falzone, Nadia
Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy
title Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy
title_full Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy
title_fullStr Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy
title_short Radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)Y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy
title_sort radiosensitivity of colorectal cancer to (90)y and the radiobiological implications for radioembolisation therapy
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31117062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab23c4
work_keys_str_mv AT leeboonq radiosensitivityofcolorectalcancerto90yandtheradiobiologicalimplicationsforradioembolisationtherapy
AT abbottelliotm radiosensitivityofcolorectalcancerto90yandtheradiobiologicalimplicationsforradioembolisationtherapy
AT ablesarah radiosensitivityofcolorectalcancerto90yandtheradiobiologicalimplicationsforradioembolisationtherapy
AT thompsonjamesm radiosensitivityofcolorectalcancerto90yandtheradiobiologicalimplicationsforradioembolisationtherapy
AT hillmarka radiosensitivityofcolorectalcancerto90yandtheradiobiologicalimplicationsforradioembolisationtherapy
AT kartsonakichristiana radiosensitivityofcolorectalcancerto90yandtheradiobiologicalimplicationsforradioembolisationtherapy
AT valliskatherinea radiosensitivityofcolorectalcancerto90yandtheradiobiologicalimplicationsforradioembolisationtherapy
AT falzonenadia radiosensitivityofcolorectalcancerto90yandtheradiobiologicalimplicationsforradioembolisationtherapy