Cargando…

Comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFFA)-guided targeted retinal photocoagulation (TRP) in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema after intravitreal Ranibizumab (RBZ). METHODS: 33 eyes of 32 treatment naïve patients diagnosed as BRVO with m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goel, Siddhi, Kumar, Atul, Ravani, Raghav D, Chandra, Parijat, Chandra, Mahesh, Kumar, Vinod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238421
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1364_18
_version_ 1783432672051200000
author Goel, Siddhi
Kumar, Atul
Ravani, Raghav D
Chandra, Parijat
Chandra, Mahesh
Kumar, Vinod
author_facet Goel, Siddhi
Kumar, Atul
Ravani, Raghav D
Chandra, Parijat
Chandra, Mahesh
Kumar, Vinod
author_sort Goel, Siddhi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the effect of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFFA)-guided targeted retinal photocoagulation (TRP) in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema after intravitreal Ranibizumab (RBZ). METHODS: 33 eyes of 32 treatment naïve patients diagnosed as BRVO with macular edema were prospectively randomized to 0.5 mg Ranibizumab only (RBZ group) (n = 17) or Ranibizumab with UWFFA-guided laser (RBZ + TRP group) (n = 16). Both groups received three injections at monthly intervals and PRN henceforth. RBZ + TRP group additionally underwent UWFFA-guided TRP of peripheral capillary nonperfusion areas 1 week post injection. Outcome measures included improvement in visual acuity, central subfoveal thickness (CST), and the number of injections required with a minimum follow-up of 9 months. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement in mean BCVA (25.7 ± 8.19 letters, P < 0.001 vs. 23.38 ± 7.56 letters, P < 0.001; in RBZ and RBZ + TRP group, respectively) and reduction in mean central subfoveal thickness (379.12 ± 242.7 μm, P < 0.001 vs. 253.75 ± 137.9 μm, P < 0.001 in RBZ and RBZ + TRP group, respectively) at 9 months. The number of injections in the RBZ group (5.76 ± 1.3) was significantly greater than RBZ + TRP (4.06 ± 0.99) (P < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvement in contrast sensitivity and mean deviation on visual fields; however, the difference between the groups was not significant (P = 0.62 and P = 0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: UWFFA-guided TRP reduced the number of injections of Ranibizumab in patients having BRVO with macular edema, while maintaining similar benefits in the improvement of BCVA, central subfoveal thickness without deleterious effect on the visual field, and contrast sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6611316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66113162019-07-22 Comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema Goel, Siddhi Kumar, Atul Ravani, Raghav D Chandra, Parijat Chandra, Mahesh Kumar, Vinod Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To determine the effect of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFFA)-guided targeted retinal photocoagulation (TRP) in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with macular edema after intravitreal Ranibizumab (RBZ). METHODS: 33 eyes of 32 treatment naïve patients diagnosed as BRVO with macular edema were prospectively randomized to 0.5 mg Ranibizumab only (RBZ group) (n = 17) or Ranibizumab with UWFFA-guided laser (RBZ + TRP group) (n = 16). Both groups received three injections at monthly intervals and PRN henceforth. RBZ + TRP group additionally underwent UWFFA-guided TRP of peripheral capillary nonperfusion areas 1 week post injection. Outcome measures included improvement in visual acuity, central subfoveal thickness (CST), and the number of injections required with a minimum follow-up of 9 months. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement in mean BCVA (25.7 ± 8.19 letters, P < 0.001 vs. 23.38 ± 7.56 letters, P < 0.001; in RBZ and RBZ + TRP group, respectively) and reduction in mean central subfoveal thickness (379.12 ± 242.7 μm, P < 0.001 vs. 253.75 ± 137.9 μm, P < 0.001 in RBZ and RBZ + TRP group, respectively) at 9 months. The number of injections in the RBZ group (5.76 ± 1.3) was significantly greater than RBZ + TRP (4.06 ± 0.99) (P < 0.001). Both groups had significant improvement in contrast sensitivity and mean deviation on visual fields; however, the difference between the groups was not significant (P = 0.62 and P = 0.79, respectively). CONCLUSION: UWFFA-guided TRP reduced the number of injections of Ranibizumab in patients having BRVO with macular edema, while maintaining similar benefits in the improvement of BCVA, central subfoveal thickness without deleterious effect on the visual field, and contrast sensitivity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6611316/ /pubmed/31238421 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1364_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goel, Siddhi
Kumar, Atul
Ravani, Raghav D
Chandra, Parijat
Chandra, Mahesh
Kumar, Vinod
Comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema
title Comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema
title_full Comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema
title_fullStr Comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema
title_short Comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema
title_sort comparison of ranibizumab alone versus ranibizumab with targeted retinal laser for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238421
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1364_18
work_keys_str_mv AT goelsiddhi comparisonofranibizumabaloneversusranibizumabwithtargetedretinallaserforbranchretinalveinocclusionwithmacularedema
AT kumaratul comparisonofranibizumabaloneversusranibizumabwithtargetedretinallaserforbranchretinalveinocclusionwithmacularedema
AT ravaniraghavd comparisonofranibizumabaloneversusranibizumabwithtargetedretinallaserforbranchretinalveinocclusionwithmacularedema
AT chandraparijat comparisonofranibizumabaloneversusranibizumabwithtargetedretinallaserforbranchretinalveinocclusionwithmacularedema
AT chandramahesh comparisonofranibizumabaloneversusranibizumabwithtargetedretinallaserforbranchretinalveinocclusionwithmacularedema
AT kumarvinod comparisonofranibizumabaloneversusranibizumabwithtargetedretinallaserforbranchretinalveinocclusionwithmacularedema