Cargando…

Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning

AIM: To evaluate the potential of the Support Vector Machine Regression model (SVM-RM) and Multilayer Neural Network Ensemble model (MLNN-EM) to improve the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for clinical workflow. BACKGROUND: Current IOL power calculation methods are limited in their accuracy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sramka, Martin, Slovak, Martin, Tuckova, Jana, Stodulka, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304064
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7202
_version_ 1783432706276720640
author Sramka, Martin
Slovak, Martin
Tuckova, Jana
Stodulka, Pavel
author_facet Sramka, Martin
Slovak, Martin
Tuckova, Jana
Stodulka, Pavel
author_sort Sramka, Martin
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the potential of the Support Vector Machine Regression model (SVM-RM) and Multilayer Neural Network Ensemble model (MLNN-EM) to improve the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for clinical workflow. BACKGROUND: Current IOL power calculation methods are limited in their accuracy with the possibility of decreased accuracy especially in eyes with an unusual ocular dimension. In case of an improperly calculated power of the IOL in cataract or refractive lens replacement surgery there is a risk of re-operation or further refractive correction. This may create potential complications and discomfort for the patient. METHODS: A dataset containing information about 2,194 eyes was obtained using data mining process from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system database of the Gemini Eye Clinic. The dataset was optimized and split into the selection set (used in the design for models and training), and the verification set (used in the evaluation). The set of mean prediction errors (PEs) and the distribution of predicted refractive errors were evaluated for both models and clinical results (CR). RESULTS: Both models performed significantly better for the majority of the evaluated parameters compared with the CR. There was no significant difference between both evaluated models. In the ±0.50 D PE category both SVM-RM and MLNN-EM were slightly better than the Barrett Universal II formula, which is often presented as the most accurate calculation formula. CONCLUSION: In comparison to the current clinical method, both SVM-RM and MLNN-EM have achieved significantly better results in IOL calculations and therefore have a strong potential to improve clinical cataract refractive outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6611496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66114962019-07-14 Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning Sramka, Martin Slovak, Martin Tuckova, Jana Stodulka, Pavel PeerJ Bioengineering AIM: To evaluate the potential of the Support Vector Machine Regression model (SVM-RM) and Multilayer Neural Network Ensemble model (MLNN-EM) to improve the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for clinical workflow. BACKGROUND: Current IOL power calculation methods are limited in their accuracy with the possibility of decreased accuracy especially in eyes with an unusual ocular dimension. In case of an improperly calculated power of the IOL in cataract or refractive lens replacement surgery there is a risk of re-operation or further refractive correction. This may create potential complications and discomfort for the patient. METHODS: A dataset containing information about 2,194 eyes was obtained using data mining process from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system database of the Gemini Eye Clinic. The dataset was optimized and split into the selection set (used in the design for models and training), and the verification set (used in the evaluation). The set of mean prediction errors (PEs) and the distribution of predicted refractive errors were evaluated for both models and clinical results (CR). RESULTS: Both models performed significantly better for the majority of the evaluated parameters compared with the CR. There was no significant difference between both evaluated models. In the ±0.50 D PE category both SVM-RM and MLNN-EM were slightly better than the Barrett Universal II formula, which is often presented as the most accurate calculation formula. CONCLUSION: In comparison to the current clinical method, both SVM-RM and MLNN-EM have achieved significantly better results in IOL calculations and therefore have a strong potential to improve clinical cataract refractive outcomes. PeerJ Inc. 2019-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6611496/ /pubmed/31304064 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7202 Text en © 2019 Sramka et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Bioengineering
Sramka, Martin
Slovak, Martin
Tuckova, Jana
Stodulka, Pavel
Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning
title Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning
title_full Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning
title_fullStr Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning
title_short Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning
title_sort improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning
topic Bioengineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31304064
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7202
work_keys_str_mv AT sramkamartin improvingclinicalrefractiveresultsofcataractsurgerybymachinelearning
AT slovakmartin improvingclinicalrefractiveresultsofcataractsurgerybymachinelearning
AT tuckovajana improvingclinicalrefractiveresultsofcataractsurgerybymachinelearning
AT stodulkapavel improvingclinicalrefractiveresultsofcataractsurgerybymachinelearning