Cargando…

Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study

INTRODUCTION: The various methods for plaque control include mechanical plaque control methods which comprises use of toothbrushes, flosses, interdental brushes, and chemical plaque control which includes mouthwashes, dentrifices. The need for the study was to prove the efficacy of flossing in child...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiran, Shital DP, Ghiya, Komal, Makwani, Disha, Bhatt, Rohan, Patel, Megha, Srivastava, Mohit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303733
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1560
_version_ 1783432712638431232
author Kiran, Shital DP
Ghiya, Komal
Makwani, Disha
Bhatt, Rohan
Patel, Megha
Srivastava, Mohit
author_facet Kiran, Shital DP
Ghiya, Komal
Makwani, Disha
Bhatt, Rohan
Patel, Megha
Srivastava, Mohit
author_sort Kiran, Shital DP
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The various methods for plaque control include mechanical plaque control methods which comprises use of toothbrushes, flosses, interdental brushes, and chemical plaque control which includes mouthwashes, dentrifices. The need for the study was to prove the efficacy of flossing in children using gumchucks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total sample size of 24 children age groups 6–12 years according to chronological age were selected. In 12 patients, flossing using gumchucks was done and in 12 patients flossing using unwaxed floss without handle was done. Proximal plaque index was taken at 0,2,4,6 weeks to assess the efficacy of both types of floss in removal of interproximal plaque. At the end of 6 weeks, patient's parents were asked to fill up the questionnaire. RESULTS: In the intragroup comparison for gumchucks, significant plaque reductions were found at 4 and 6 weeks. In the intragroup comparison for unwaxed floss, significant reduction for plaque marginal index were recorded from baseline to 2 and 4 weeks. In the intergroup comparison, significant reduction in plaque index was recorded at 4 and 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Gumchucks have the high efficacy of plaque removal as well as easy in use for children routinely. Also when surveyed majority of the patents preferred gumchucks if available in the stores. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kiran SDP, Ghiya K, Makwani D, Bhatt R, Patel M, Srivastava M. Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2018;11(6):474-478
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6611534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66115342019-07-14 Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study Kiran, Shital DP Ghiya, Komal Makwani, Disha Bhatt, Rohan Patel, Megha Srivastava, Mohit Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: The various methods for plaque control include mechanical plaque control methods which comprises use of toothbrushes, flosses, interdental brushes, and chemical plaque control which includes mouthwashes, dentrifices. The need for the study was to prove the efficacy of flossing in children using gumchucks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total sample size of 24 children age groups 6–12 years according to chronological age were selected. In 12 patients, flossing using gumchucks was done and in 12 patients flossing using unwaxed floss without handle was done. Proximal plaque index was taken at 0,2,4,6 weeks to assess the efficacy of both types of floss in removal of interproximal plaque. At the end of 6 weeks, patient's parents were asked to fill up the questionnaire. RESULTS: In the intragroup comparison for gumchucks, significant plaque reductions were found at 4 and 6 weeks. In the intragroup comparison for unwaxed floss, significant reduction for plaque marginal index were recorded from baseline to 2 and 4 weeks. In the intergroup comparison, significant reduction in plaque index was recorded at 4 and 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Gumchucks have the high efficacy of plaque removal as well as easy in use for children routinely. Also when surveyed majority of the patents preferred gumchucks if available in the stores. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kiran SDP, Ghiya K, Makwani D, Bhatt R, Patel M, Srivastava M. Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2018;11(6):474-478 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6611534/ /pubmed/31303733 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1560 Text en Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Kiran, Shital DP
Ghiya, Komal
Makwani, Disha
Bhatt, Rohan
Patel, Megha
Srivastava, Mohit
Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study
title Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study
title_full Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study
title_short Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Novel Flossing Agent with the Conventional Floss: A Clinical Study
title_sort comparison of plaque removal efficacy of a novel flossing agent with the conventional floss: a clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303733
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1560
work_keys_str_mv AT kiranshitaldp comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacyofanovelflossingagentwiththeconventionalflossaclinicalstudy
AT ghiyakomal comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacyofanovelflossingagentwiththeconventionalflossaclinicalstudy
AT makwanidisha comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacyofanovelflossingagentwiththeconventionalflossaclinicalstudy
AT bhattrohan comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacyofanovelflossingagentwiththeconventionalflossaclinicalstudy
AT patelmegha comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacyofanovelflossingagentwiththeconventionalflossaclinicalstudy
AT srivastavamohit comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacyofanovelflossingagentwiththeconventionalflossaclinicalstudy