Cargando…
Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars
BACKGROUND: Most caries prevalence studies are conducted in community-based settings, usually with no radiographs, therefore, it is questionable if visual examination alone captures the true extent of disease. AIM: Since it is relatively easy to diagnose occlusal and facial/lingual surface (nonproxi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303730 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1557 |
_version_ | 1783432713812836352 |
---|---|
author | Dhar, Vineet Mon, Soe Macek, Mark D |
author_facet | Dhar, Vineet Mon, Soe Macek, Mark D |
author_sort | Dhar, Vineet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most caries prevalence studies are conducted in community-based settings, usually with no radiographs, therefore, it is questionable if visual examination alone captures the true extent of disease. AIM: Since it is relatively easy to diagnose occlusal and facial/lingual surface (nonproximal caries) on visual examination, our aim was to evaluate for an association between nonproximal caries (NP) and proximal caries (P), which if present can provide a tool to help decision makers in estimating the true extent of the disease. DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective chart audit was done using records of 106 children to determine the association between NP and P caries in the primary dentition. RESULTS: Our mean dft for NP lesions only was 1.55. Based on our data, the mean dft considering all pit and fissure plus the proximal lesions was 2.54, which is a 63.2% increase from the dft based on NP caries only. We found a significant association between NP caries and radiographically detectable P caries. Proximal lesions were twice as likely to exist on primary molars when non-proximal/pit and fissure carious lesions were present. CONCLUSION: The results imply that proximal caries, and thus need for treatment, are being underestimated during visual exams. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Dhar V, Mon S, Macek MD. Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2018;11(6):457-461. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6611539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66115392019-07-14 Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars Dhar, Vineet Mon, Soe Macek, Mark D Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Most caries prevalence studies are conducted in community-based settings, usually with no radiographs, therefore, it is questionable if visual examination alone captures the true extent of disease. AIM: Since it is relatively easy to diagnose occlusal and facial/lingual surface (nonproximal caries) on visual examination, our aim was to evaluate for an association between nonproximal caries (NP) and proximal caries (P), which if present can provide a tool to help decision makers in estimating the true extent of the disease. DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective chart audit was done using records of 106 children to determine the association between NP and P caries in the primary dentition. RESULTS: Our mean dft for NP lesions only was 1.55. Based on our data, the mean dft considering all pit and fissure plus the proximal lesions was 2.54, which is a 63.2% increase from the dft based on NP caries only. We found a significant association between NP caries and radiographically detectable P caries. Proximal lesions were twice as likely to exist on primary molars when non-proximal/pit and fissure carious lesions were present. CONCLUSION: The results imply that proximal caries, and thus need for treatment, are being underestimated during visual exams. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Dhar V, Mon S, Macek MD. Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2018;11(6):457-461. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6611539/ /pubmed/31303730 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1557 Text en Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dhar, Vineet Mon, Soe Macek, Mark D Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars |
title | Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars |
title_full | Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars |
title_short | Evaluation of Nonproximal Caries as Predictor of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars |
title_sort | evaluation of nonproximal caries as predictor of proximal caries in primary molars |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303730 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dharvineet evaluationofnonproximalcariesaspredictorofproximalcariesinprimarymolars AT monsoe evaluationofnonproximalcariesaspredictorofproximalcariesinprimarymolars AT macekmarkd evaluationofnonproximalcariesaspredictorofproximalcariesinprimarymolars |