Cargando…

Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD

Background: This study compared real-world patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measured by the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), the London Chest Activities of Daily Living (LCADL) scale, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire between individuals with COPD initiating LA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strange, Charlie, Walker, Valery, DePietro, Michael, Tong, Junliang, Kurlander, Jonathan, Carlyle, Maureen, Millette, Lauren A, Wittbrodt, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303751
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S194856
_version_ 1783432807101497344
author Strange, Charlie
Walker, Valery
DePietro, Michael
Tong, Junliang
Kurlander, Jonathan
Carlyle, Maureen
Millette, Lauren A
Wittbrodt, Eric
author_facet Strange, Charlie
Walker, Valery
DePietro, Michael
Tong, Junliang
Kurlander, Jonathan
Carlyle, Maureen
Millette, Lauren A
Wittbrodt, Eric
author_sort Strange, Charlie
collection PubMed
description Background: This study compared real-world patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measured by the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), the London Chest Activities of Daily Living (LCADL) scale, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire between individuals with COPD initiating LAMA/LABA fixed-dose combination (FDC) dual therapy versus either long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) monotherapy. Methods: Individuals with COPD aged ≥40 years initiating a LAMA/LABA FDC dual therapy or a LAMA or LABA monotherapy (index date = first prescription date) between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016 were identified from a large US administrative claims database. Individuals were excluded if they were prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or ICS/LABA two months prior to the index date or were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, or asthma. The cohorts were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:1 for COPD severity using baseline measures. Each participant completed a survey. Results: Surveys were completed by 399 participants in the dual therapy cohort, and 718 participants in the monotherapy cohort. Following PSM, 379 participants remained in each cohort for analysis (monotherapy: 369 LAMA and 10 LABA). The dual therapy cohort reported fewer COPD-related symptoms (CCQ symptom score 2.75 vs 2.97, respectively, P=0.023), and, fewer limitations in leisure activities (LCADL leisure score 4.78 vs 5.17, respectively, P=0.021) versus the monotherapy cohort. No significant differences were found in the WPAI. A greater percentage of participants in the dual therapy cohort stayed on index therapy (63.1%) when compared with the monotherapy cohort (30.3%, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Only 30% of the participants prescribed monotherapy, usually with a LAMA, remained on index therapy alone at the time of survey administration. In the dual therapy cohort, 63% of the participants remained on the index medication and had fewer COPD-related symptoms and fewer limitations in leisure activities compared with participants in the monotherapy cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66120162019-07-14 Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD Strange, Charlie Walker, Valery DePietro, Michael Tong, Junliang Kurlander, Jonathan Carlyle, Maureen Millette, Lauren A Wittbrodt, Eric Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research Background: This study compared real-world patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measured by the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), the London Chest Activities of Daily Living (LCADL) scale, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire between individuals with COPD initiating LAMA/LABA fixed-dose combination (FDC) dual therapy versus either long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) monotherapy. Methods: Individuals with COPD aged ≥40 years initiating a LAMA/LABA FDC dual therapy or a LAMA or LABA monotherapy (index date = first prescription date) between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016 were identified from a large US administrative claims database. Individuals were excluded if they were prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or ICS/LABA two months prior to the index date or were diagnosed with cystic fibrosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, or asthma. The cohorts were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:1 for COPD severity using baseline measures. Each participant completed a survey. Results: Surveys were completed by 399 participants in the dual therapy cohort, and 718 participants in the monotherapy cohort. Following PSM, 379 participants remained in each cohort for analysis (monotherapy: 369 LAMA and 10 LABA). The dual therapy cohort reported fewer COPD-related symptoms (CCQ symptom score 2.75 vs 2.97, respectively, P=0.023), and, fewer limitations in leisure activities (LCADL leisure score 4.78 vs 5.17, respectively, P=0.021) versus the monotherapy cohort. No significant differences were found in the WPAI. A greater percentage of participants in the dual therapy cohort stayed on index therapy (63.1%) when compared with the monotherapy cohort (30.3%, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Only 30% of the participants prescribed monotherapy, usually with a LAMA, remained on index therapy alone at the time of survey administration. In the dual therapy cohort, 63% of the participants remained on the index medication and had fewer COPD-related symptoms and fewer limitations in leisure activities compared with participants in the monotherapy cohort. Dove 2019-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6612016/ /pubmed/31303751 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S194856 Text en © 2019 Strange et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Strange, Charlie
Walker, Valery
DePietro, Michael
Tong, Junliang
Kurlander, Jonathan
Carlyle, Maureen
Millette, Lauren A
Wittbrodt, Eric
Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD
title Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD
title_full Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD
title_short Patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with COPD
title_sort patient-reported outcomes of dual bronchodilator fixed-dose combination versus bronchodilator monotherapy in individuals with copd
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303751
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S194856
work_keys_str_mv AT strangecharlie patientreportedoutcomesofdualbronchodilatorfixeddosecombinationversusbronchodilatormonotherapyinindividualswithcopd
AT walkervalery patientreportedoutcomesofdualbronchodilatorfixeddosecombinationversusbronchodilatormonotherapyinindividualswithcopd
AT depietromichael patientreportedoutcomesofdualbronchodilatorfixeddosecombinationversusbronchodilatormonotherapyinindividualswithcopd
AT tongjunliang patientreportedoutcomesofdualbronchodilatorfixeddosecombinationversusbronchodilatormonotherapyinindividualswithcopd
AT kurlanderjonathan patientreportedoutcomesofdualbronchodilatorfixeddosecombinationversusbronchodilatormonotherapyinindividualswithcopd
AT carlylemaureen patientreportedoutcomesofdualbronchodilatorfixeddosecombinationversusbronchodilatormonotherapyinindividualswithcopd
AT millettelaurena patientreportedoutcomesofdualbronchodilatorfixeddosecombinationversusbronchodilatormonotherapyinindividualswithcopd
AT wittbrodteric patientreportedoutcomesofdualbronchodilatorfixeddosecombinationversusbronchodilatormonotherapyinindividualswithcopd