Cargando…
Microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage
BACKGROUND: Dental calculus, calcified oral plaque biofilm, contains microbial and host biomolecules that can be used to study historic microbiome communities and host responses. Dental calculus does not typically accumulate as much today as historically, and clinical oral microbiome research studie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31279340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0717-3 |
_version_ | 1783432819776684032 |
---|---|
author | Velsko, Irina M. Fellows Yates, James A. Aron, Franziska Hagan, Richard W. Frantz, Laurent A. F. Loe, Louise Martinez, Juan Bautista Rodriguez Chaves, Eros Gosden, Chris Larson, Greger Warinner, Christina |
author_facet | Velsko, Irina M. Fellows Yates, James A. Aron, Franziska Hagan, Richard W. Frantz, Laurent A. F. Loe, Louise Martinez, Juan Bautista Rodriguez Chaves, Eros Gosden, Chris Larson, Greger Warinner, Christina |
author_sort | Velsko, Irina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dental calculus, calcified oral plaque biofilm, contains microbial and host biomolecules that can be used to study historic microbiome communities and host responses. Dental calculus does not typically accumulate as much today as historically, and clinical oral microbiome research studies focus primarily on living dental plaque biofilm. However, plaque and calculus reflect different conditions of the oral biofilm, and the differences in microbial characteristics between the sample types have not yet been systematically explored. Here, we compare the microbial profiles of modern dental plaque, modern dental calculus, and historic dental calculus to establish expected differences between these substrates. RESULTS: Metagenomic data was generated from modern and historic calculus samples, and dental plaque metagenomic data was downloaded from the Human Microbiome Project. Microbial composition and functional profile were assessed. Metaproteomic data was obtained from a subset of historic calculus samples. Comparisons between microbial, protein, and metabolomic profiles revealed distinct taxonomic and metabolic functional profiles between plaque, modern calculus, and historic calculus, but not between calculus collected from healthy teeth and periodontal disease-affected teeth. Species co-exclusion was related to biofilm environment. Proteomic profiling revealed that healthy tooth samples contain low levels of bacterial virulence proteins and a robust innate immune response. Correlations between proteomic and metabolomic profiles suggest co-preservation of bacterial lipid membranes and membrane-associated proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we find that there are systematic microbial differences between plaque and calculus related to biofilm physiology, and recognizing these differences is important for accurate data interpretation in studies comparing dental plaque and calculus. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-019-0717-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6612086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66120862019-07-16 Microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage Velsko, Irina M. Fellows Yates, James A. Aron, Franziska Hagan, Richard W. Frantz, Laurent A. F. Loe, Louise Martinez, Juan Bautista Rodriguez Chaves, Eros Gosden, Chris Larson, Greger Warinner, Christina Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: Dental calculus, calcified oral plaque biofilm, contains microbial and host biomolecules that can be used to study historic microbiome communities and host responses. Dental calculus does not typically accumulate as much today as historically, and clinical oral microbiome research studies focus primarily on living dental plaque biofilm. However, plaque and calculus reflect different conditions of the oral biofilm, and the differences in microbial characteristics between the sample types have not yet been systematically explored. Here, we compare the microbial profiles of modern dental plaque, modern dental calculus, and historic dental calculus to establish expected differences between these substrates. RESULTS: Metagenomic data was generated from modern and historic calculus samples, and dental plaque metagenomic data was downloaded from the Human Microbiome Project. Microbial composition and functional profile were assessed. Metaproteomic data was obtained from a subset of historic calculus samples. Comparisons between microbial, protein, and metabolomic profiles revealed distinct taxonomic and metabolic functional profiles between plaque, modern calculus, and historic calculus, but not between calculus collected from healthy teeth and periodontal disease-affected teeth. Species co-exclusion was related to biofilm environment. Proteomic profiling revealed that healthy tooth samples contain low levels of bacterial virulence proteins and a robust innate immune response. Correlations between proteomic and metabolomic profiles suggest co-preservation of bacterial lipid membranes and membrane-associated proteins. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we find that there are systematic microbial differences between plaque and calculus related to biofilm physiology, and recognizing these differences is important for accurate data interpretation in studies comparing dental plaque and calculus. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40168-019-0717-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6612086/ /pubmed/31279340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0717-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Velsko, Irina M. Fellows Yates, James A. Aron, Franziska Hagan, Richard W. Frantz, Laurent A. F. Loe, Louise Martinez, Juan Bautista Rodriguez Chaves, Eros Gosden, Chris Larson, Greger Warinner, Christina Microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage |
title | Microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage |
title_full | Microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage |
title_fullStr | Microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage |
title_short | Microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage |
title_sort | microbial differences between dental plaque and historic dental calculus are related to oral biofilm maturation stage |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31279340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0717-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT velskoirinam microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT fellowsyatesjamesa microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT aronfranziska microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT haganrichardw microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT frantzlaurentaf microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT loelouise microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT martinezjuanbautistarodriguez microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT chaveseros microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT gosdenchris microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT larsongreger microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage AT warinnerchristina microbialdifferencesbetweendentalplaqueandhistoricdentalcalculusarerelatedtooralbiofilmmaturationstage |