Cargando…

The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform

INTRODUCTION: While considerable attention has been given to improving health workforce planning practice, few articles focus on the relationship between health workforce governance and health reform. By outlining a sequence of health reforms, we reveal how New Zealand’s health workforce governance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rees, Gareth H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0390-4
_version_ 1783432828458893312
author Rees, Gareth H.
author_facet Rees, Gareth H.
author_sort Rees, Gareth H.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While considerable attention has been given to improving health workforce planning practice, few articles focus on the relationship between health workforce governance and health reform. By outlining a sequence of health reforms, we reveal how New Zealand’s health workforce governance and practices came under pressure, leading to a rethink and the introduction of innovative approaches and initiatives. CASE DESCRIPTION: New Zealand’s health system was quite stable up to the late 1980s, after which 30 years of structural and system reform was undertaken. This had the effect of replacing the centralised medically led health workforce policy and planning system with a market-driven and short-run employer-led planning approach. The increasing pressures and inconsistencies this approach produced ultimately led to the re-centralisation of some governance functions and brought with it a new vision of how to better prepare for future health needs. While significant gain has been made implementing this new vision, issues remain for achieving more effective innovation diffusion and improved integrated care orientations. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: The case reveals that there was a failure to consider the health workforce in almost all of the reforms. Health and workforce policy became increasingly disconnected at the central and regional levels, leading to fragmentation, duplication and widening gaps. New Zealand’s more recent workforce policy and planning approach has adopted new tools and techniques to overcome these weaknesses that have implications for the workforce and service delivery, workforce governance and planning methodologies. However, further strengthening of workforce governance is required to embed the changes in policy and planning and to improve organisational capabilities to diffuse innovation and respond to evolving roles and team-based models of care. CONCLUSION: The case reveals that disconnecting the workforce from reform policy leads to a range of debilitating effects. By addressing how it approaches workforce planning and policy, New Zealand is now better placed to plan for a future of integrated and team-based health care. The case provides cues for other countries considering reform agendas, the most important being to include and consider the health workforce in health reform processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66121232019-07-16 The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform Rees, Gareth H. Hum Resour Health Case Study INTRODUCTION: While considerable attention has been given to improving health workforce planning practice, few articles focus on the relationship between health workforce governance and health reform. By outlining a sequence of health reforms, we reveal how New Zealand’s health workforce governance and practices came under pressure, leading to a rethink and the introduction of innovative approaches and initiatives. CASE DESCRIPTION: New Zealand’s health system was quite stable up to the late 1980s, after which 30 years of structural and system reform was undertaken. This had the effect of replacing the centralised medically led health workforce policy and planning system with a market-driven and short-run employer-led planning approach. The increasing pressures and inconsistencies this approach produced ultimately led to the re-centralisation of some governance functions and brought with it a new vision of how to better prepare for future health needs. While significant gain has been made implementing this new vision, issues remain for achieving more effective innovation diffusion and improved integrated care orientations. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: The case reveals that there was a failure to consider the health workforce in almost all of the reforms. Health and workforce policy became increasingly disconnected at the central and regional levels, leading to fragmentation, duplication and widening gaps. New Zealand’s more recent workforce policy and planning approach has adopted new tools and techniques to overcome these weaknesses that have implications for the workforce and service delivery, workforce governance and planning methodologies. However, further strengthening of workforce governance is required to embed the changes in policy and planning and to improve organisational capabilities to diffuse innovation and respond to evolving roles and team-based models of care. CONCLUSION: The case reveals that disconnecting the workforce from reform policy leads to a range of debilitating effects. By addressing how it approaches workforce planning and policy, New Zealand is now better placed to plan for a future of integrated and team-based health care. The case provides cues for other countries considering reform agendas, the most important being to include and consider the health workforce in health reform processes. BioMed Central 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6612123/ /pubmed/31277664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0390-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Study
Rees, Gareth H.
The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
title The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
title_full The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
title_fullStr The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
title_short The evolution of New Zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
title_sort evolution of new zealand’s health workforce policy and planning system: a study of workforce governance and health reform
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0390-4
work_keys_str_mv AT reesgarethh theevolutionofnewzealandshealthworkforcepolicyandplanningsystemastudyofworkforcegovernanceandhealthreform
AT reesgarethh evolutionofnewzealandshealthworkforcepolicyandplanningsystemastudyofworkforcegovernanceandhealthreform