Cargando…
Impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Vascularized free fibular flaps have been the “workhorses” for reconstruction of many kinds of bone defects. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the optimal wound closure method for fibular donor sites. This study aimed to compare prognostic outcomes of primarily closures (PC)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0545-1 |
_version_ | 1783432836116643840 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Hui Liu, Fayu Sun, Changfu Pang, Pai |
author_facet | Fang, Hui Liu, Fayu Sun, Changfu Pang, Pai |
author_sort | Fang, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Vascularized free fibular flaps have been the “workhorses” for reconstruction of many kinds of bone defects. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the optimal wound closure method for fibular donor sites. This study aimed to compare prognostic outcomes of primarily closures (PC) and skin grafts (SG) for fibular donor sites. METHODS: Studies regarding donor-site outcomes of PC versus SG in patients undergoing free fibular flap procedures were included. Two authors individually searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov up to February 2019, extracted the data and assessed quality of each selected article. Ultimately, The incidences of donor-site morbidities were evaluated. RESULTS: Five studies with a total of 119 patients were included in our analysis. No significant differences were found with respect to the rates of donor-site problems between the PC and SG groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fibular flap patients undergoing PC and SG wound closures may have similar donor-site outcomes. Additional large-scale studies are necessary to draw a solid conclusion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-019-0545-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6612155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66121552019-07-16 Impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis Fang, Hui Liu, Fayu Sun, Changfu Pang, Pai BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Vascularized free fibular flaps have been the “workhorses” for reconstruction of many kinds of bone defects. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the optimal wound closure method for fibular donor sites. This study aimed to compare prognostic outcomes of primarily closures (PC) and skin grafts (SG) for fibular donor sites. METHODS: Studies regarding donor-site outcomes of PC versus SG in patients undergoing free fibular flap procedures were included. Two authors individually searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov up to February 2019, extracted the data and assessed quality of each selected article. Ultimately, The incidences of donor-site morbidities were evaluated. RESULTS: Five studies with a total of 119 patients were included in our analysis. No significant differences were found with respect to the rates of donor-site problems between the PC and SG groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fibular flap patients undergoing PC and SG wound closures may have similar donor-site outcomes. Additional large-scale studies are necessary to draw a solid conclusion. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-019-0545-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6612155/ /pubmed/31277627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0545-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fang, Hui Liu, Fayu Sun, Changfu Pang, Pai Impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis |
title | Impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | impact of wound closure on fibular donor-site morbidity: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0545-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanghui impactofwoundclosureonfibulardonorsitemorbidityametaanalysis AT liufayu impactofwoundclosureonfibulardonorsitemorbidityametaanalysis AT sunchangfu impactofwoundclosureonfibulardonorsitemorbidityametaanalysis AT pangpai impactofwoundclosureonfibulardonorsitemorbidityametaanalysis |