Cargando…
Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at increased risk of influenza-related complications. The World Health Organisation recommends influenza vaccination to this high-risk population as highest priority. However, achieving high influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women remains challenging. We conduc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7172-8 |
_version_ | 1783432836364107776 |
---|---|
author | Offeddu, Vittoria Tam, Clarence C. Yong, Tze Tein Tan, Lay Kok Thoon, Koh Cheng Lee, Nicole Tan, Thiam Chye Yeo, George S. H. Yung, Chee Fu |
author_facet | Offeddu, Vittoria Tam, Clarence C. Yong, Tze Tein Tan, Lay Kok Thoon, Koh Cheng Lee, Nicole Tan, Thiam Chye Yeo, George S. H. Yung, Chee Fu |
author_sort | Offeddu, Vittoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at increased risk of influenza-related complications. The World Health Organisation recommends influenza vaccination to this high-risk population as highest priority. However, achieving high influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women remains challenging. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to estimate the coverage and determinants of influenza vaccination among pregnant women in Singapore. METHODS: Between September and November 2017, pregnant women aged ≥21 years were recruited at two public hospitals in Singapore. Participants completed an anonymous, self-administered online questionnaire assessing participants’ influenza vaccination uptake, knowledge of and attitudes towards influenza and the influenza vaccine, vaccination history, willingness to pay for the influenza vaccine, and external cues to vaccination. We estimated vaccine coverage and used multivariable Poisson models to identify factors associated with vaccine uptake. RESULTS: Response rate was 61% (500/814). Only 49 women (9.8, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 7.3–12.7%) reported receiving the vaccine during their current pregnancy. A few misconceptions were identified among participants, such as the belief that influenza can be treated with antibiotics. The most frequent reason for not being vaccinated was lack of recommendation. Women who were personally advised to get vaccinated against influenza during pregnancy were 7 times more likely to be vaccinated (prevalence ratio (PR) = 7.11; 95% CI: 3.92–12.90). However, only 12% of women were personally advised to get vaccinated. Other factors associated with vaccine uptake were vaccination during a previous pregnancy (PR = 2.51; 95% CI: 1.54–4.11), having insurance to cover the cost of the vaccine (PR = 2.32; 95% CI: 1.43–3.76), and higher vaccine confidence (PR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.30–2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination uptake among pregnant women in Singapore is low. There is considerable scope for improving vaccination coverage in this high-risk population through vaccination recommendations from healthcare professionals, and public communication targeting common misconceptions about influenza and influenza vaccines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7172-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6612156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66121562019-07-16 Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study Offeddu, Vittoria Tam, Clarence C. Yong, Tze Tein Tan, Lay Kok Thoon, Koh Cheng Lee, Nicole Tan, Thiam Chye Yeo, George S. H. Yung, Chee Fu BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at increased risk of influenza-related complications. The World Health Organisation recommends influenza vaccination to this high-risk population as highest priority. However, achieving high influenza vaccine coverage among pregnant women remains challenging. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to estimate the coverage and determinants of influenza vaccination among pregnant women in Singapore. METHODS: Between September and November 2017, pregnant women aged ≥21 years were recruited at two public hospitals in Singapore. Participants completed an anonymous, self-administered online questionnaire assessing participants’ influenza vaccination uptake, knowledge of and attitudes towards influenza and the influenza vaccine, vaccination history, willingness to pay for the influenza vaccine, and external cues to vaccination. We estimated vaccine coverage and used multivariable Poisson models to identify factors associated with vaccine uptake. RESULTS: Response rate was 61% (500/814). Only 49 women (9.8, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 7.3–12.7%) reported receiving the vaccine during their current pregnancy. A few misconceptions were identified among participants, such as the belief that influenza can be treated with antibiotics. The most frequent reason for not being vaccinated was lack of recommendation. Women who were personally advised to get vaccinated against influenza during pregnancy were 7 times more likely to be vaccinated (prevalence ratio (PR) = 7.11; 95% CI: 3.92–12.90). However, only 12% of women were personally advised to get vaccinated. Other factors associated with vaccine uptake were vaccination during a previous pregnancy (PR = 2.51; 95% CI: 1.54–4.11), having insurance to cover the cost of the vaccine (PR = 2.32; 95% CI: 1.43–3.76), and higher vaccine confidence (PR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.30–2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination uptake among pregnant women in Singapore is low. There is considerable scope for improving vaccination coverage in this high-risk population through vaccination recommendations from healthcare professionals, and public communication targeting common misconceptions about influenza and influenza vaccines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7172-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6612156/ /pubmed/31277611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7172-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Offeddu, Vittoria Tam, Clarence C. Yong, Tze Tein Tan, Lay Kok Thoon, Koh Cheng Lee, Nicole Tan, Thiam Chye Yeo, George S. H. Yung, Chee Fu Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study |
title | Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | coverage and determinants of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7172-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT offedduvittoria coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy AT tamclarencec coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy AT yongtzetein coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy AT tanlaykok coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy AT thoonkohcheng coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy AT leenicole coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy AT tanthiamchye coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy AT yeogeorgesh coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy AT yungcheefu coverageanddeterminantsofinfluenzavaccineamongpregnantwomenacrosssectionalstudy |