Cargando…

Ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: The invasive method for intracranial pressure measurement is ‘gold standard’ but not always feasible because the intraventricular catheter/ intraparenchymal micro transducer used in the measurement of intracranial pressure measurement may cause complications. Imaging modalities with clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Jing, Li, Jing, Ye, Tiantian, Zeng, Yanrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0354-0
_version_ 1783432845707968512
author Zhou, Jing
Li, Jing
Ye, Tiantian
Zeng, Yanrong
author_facet Zhou, Jing
Li, Jing
Ye, Tiantian
Zeng, Yanrong
author_sort Zhou, Jing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The invasive method for intracranial pressure measurement is ‘gold standard’ but not always feasible because the intraventricular catheter/ intraparenchymal micro transducer used in the measurement of intracranial pressure measurement may cause complications. Imaging modalities with clinical examination protocol have a lack of specificity and accuracy. The objective of the study was to compare the accuracy of diagnostic parameters of ultrasound measurements in patients with brain injury underwent invasive intracranial pressure measurement method. METHODS: Data of invasive intracranial pressure measurement method and ultrasound measurements of 185 patients with brain injury who required admission diagnosis were included in the analysis. Pearson correlation was tested for diagnostic parameters. Logistical regression analysis was performed for diagnostic parameters of death patients to evaluate independent parameter of mortality. RESULTS: Straight sinus flow velocities, middle cerebral artery flow velocities, and optic nerve sheath diameter were correlated with intracranial pressure (p < 0.0001 for all). Arterial blood pressure (p = 0.127) and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (p = 0.06) were not correlated with intracranial pressure. A total of 47 patients died during the study period. Intracranial pressure (p = 0.015) and optic nerve sheath diameter (p = 0.035) were found to be independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound measurement especially optic nerve sheath diameter can be successfully used instead of invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66121962019-07-16 Ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study Zhou, Jing Li, Jing Ye, Tiantian Zeng, Yanrong BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: The invasive method for intracranial pressure measurement is ‘gold standard’ but not always feasible because the intraventricular catheter/ intraparenchymal micro transducer used in the measurement of intracranial pressure measurement may cause complications. Imaging modalities with clinical examination protocol have a lack of specificity and accuracy. The objective of the study was to compare the accuracy of diagnostic parameters of ultrasound measurements in patients with brain injury underwent invasive intracranial pressure measurement method. METHODS: Data of invasive intracranial pressure measurement method and ultrasound measurements of 185 patients with brain injury who required admission diagnosis were included in the analysis. Pearson correlation was tested for diagnostic parameters. Logistical regression analysis was performed for diagnostic parameters of death patients to evaluate independent parameter of mortality. RESULTS: Straight sinus flow velocities, middle cerebral artery flow velocities, and optic nerve sheath diameter were correlated with intracranial pressure (p < 0.0001 for all). Arterial blood pressure (p = 0.127) and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (p = 0.06) were not correlated with intracranial pressure. A total of 47 patients died during the study period. Intracranial pressure (p = 0.015) and optic nerve sheath diameter (p = 0.035) were found to be independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound measurement especially optic nerve sheath diameter can be successfully used instead of invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. BioMed Central 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6612196/ /pubmed/31277606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0354-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Jing
Li, Jing
Ye, Tiantian
Zeng, Yanrong
Ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study
title Ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study
title_full Ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study
title_short Ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study
title_sort ultrasound measurements versus invasive intracranial pressure measurement method in patients with brain injury: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0354-0
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujing ultrasoundmeasurementsversusinvasiveintracranialpressuremeasurementmethodinpatientswithbraininjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT lijing ultrasoundmeasurementsversusinvasiveintracranialpressuremeasurementmethodinpatientswithbraininjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT yetiantian ultrasoundmeasurementsversusinvasiveintracranialpressuremeasurementmethodinpatientswithbraininjuryaretrospectivestudy
AT zengyanrong ultrasoundmeasurementsversusinvasiveintracranialpressuremeasurementmethodinpatientswithbraininjuryaretrospectivestudy