Cargando…

Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Ectopic sinonasal teeth are uncommon. The classic approach to removal of such foreign bodies was the Caldwell-Luc. In recent years however, endoscopic approaches have become increasingly utilized. Despite this, there is a dearth of literature and consensus regarding the endoscopic remo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levin, Marc, Sommer, Doron D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0353-8
_version_ 1783432848718430208
author Levin, Marc
Sommer, Doron D.
author_facet Levin, Marc
Sommer, Doron D.
author_sort Levin, Marc
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ectopic sinonasal teeth are uncommon. The classic approach to removal of such foreign bodies was the Caldwell-Luc. In recent years however, endoscopic approaches have become increasingly utilized. Despite this, there is a dearth of literature and consensus regarding the endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth. As such, we conducted a systematic review on all cases of endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth in the literature. With an understanding of the literature, clinical and technical decision making for patients with this pathology may be elucidated. METHODS: Systematic review of the Ovid Medline, EMBASE Classic and Pubmed databases were conducted using PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Our search identified 100 articles. Final inclusion consisted of 23 studies with a total of 27 patient cases. The majority of the patients included were male (70.4%) with a mean age of 27.06 years. Patients presented with a multitude of symptoms, with nasal obstruction (48.14%), rhinorrhea (22.2%), facial pain (22.2%) and epistaxis (22.2%) being most common. Surgeons mostly reported using a 0° endoscope (22.2%) and performing a maxillary antrostomy/uncinectomy (37%) and simple extraction under general anesthetic (41%). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review analyzed important epidemiological, clinical and technical information regarding patients with endoscopic removal of sinonasal ectopic teeth. Further research is needed to promote implementation of such data into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66122092019-07-16 Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review Levin, Marc Sommer, Doron D. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Review INTRODUCTION: Ectopic sinonasal teeth are uncommon. The classic approach to removal of such foreign bodies was the Caldwell-Luc. In recent years however, endoscopic approaches have become increasingly utilized. Despite this, there is a dearth of literature and consensus regarding the endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth. As such, we conducted a systematic review on all cases of endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth in the literature. With an understanding of the literature, clinical and technical decision making for patients with this pathology may be elucidated. METHODS: Systematic review of the Ovid Medline, EMBASE Classic and Pubmed databases were conducted using PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Our search identified 100 articles. Final inclusion consisted of 23 studies with a total of 27 patient cases. The majority of the patients included were male (70.4%) with a mean age of 27.06 years. Patients presented with a multitude of symptoms, with nasal obstruction (48.14%), rhinorrhea (22.2%), facial pain (22.2%) and epistaxis (22.2%) being most common. Surgeons mostly reported using a 0° endoscope (22.2%) and performing a maxillary antrostomy/uncinectomy (37%) and simple extraction under general anesthetic (41%). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review analyzed important epidemiological, clinical and technical information regarding patients with endoscopic removal of sinonasal ectopic teeth. Further research is needed to promote implementation of such data into clinical practice. BioMed Central 2019-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6612209/ /pubmed/31277707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0353-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Levin, Marc
Sommer, Doron D.
Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_full Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_fullStr Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_short Endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
title_sort endoscopic removal of ectopic sinonasal teeth: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31277707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-019-0353-8
work_keys_str_mv AT levinmarc endoscopicremovalofectopicsinonasalteethasystematicreview
AT sommerdorond endoscopicremovalofectopicsinonasalteethasystematicreview