Cargando…
Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
INTRODUCTION: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are an established treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction among treatment-naïve T2DM patients receiving once-weekly trelaglipt...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1 |
_version_ | 1783432867691364352 |
---|---|
author | Ishii, Hitoshi Suzaki, Yuki Miyata, Yuko Matsui, Shingo |
author_facet | Ishii, Hitoshi Suzaki, Yuki Miyata, Yuko Matsui, Shingo |
author_sort | Ishii, Hitoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are an established treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction among treatment-naïve T2DM patients receiving once-weekly trelagliptin or a daily DPP-4 inhibitor. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IV study conducted in Japan, 218 patients were randomized to trelagliptin 100 mg once weekly or a once- or twice-daily DPP-4 inhibitor for 12 weeks (NCT03014479; JapicCTI-173482). QOL and treatment satisfaction were assessed using the Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) Questionnaire and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), respectively. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in DTR-QOL total score at week 12. Secondary endpoints included further analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ components. Other endpoints included glycemic control, treatment adherence, and safety. RESULTS: The between-group difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in DTR-QOL total score was 2.418 (95% confidence interval − 1.546, 6.382; P = 0.2305). Analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ results by subscales and stratification generally showed a numerical improvement with trelagliptin over daily DPP-4 inhibitors. QOL and treatment satisfaction improved with a reduction in frequency of concurrent and study drug dosing. Treatment adherence was > 97% for both groups. The effect of trelagliptin on glycemic control was similar to that seen with daily DPP-4 inhibitors. Trelagliptin and daily DPP-4 inhibitors were well-tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly trelagliptin 100 mg administered for 12 weeks resulted in a numerically, but not statistically, greater improvement in QOL and treatment satisfaction versus daily DPP-4 inhibitors. The decision to administer once-weekly or daily DPP-4 inhibitor treatment is likely to depend on patient preferences and the treatment policies of physicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03014479) and JAPIC (JapicCTI-173482). FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6612345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66123452019-07-23 Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Ishii, Hitoshi Suzaki, Yuki Miyata, Yuko Matsui, Shingo Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are an established treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction among treatment-naïve T2DM patients receiving once-weekly trelagliptin or a daily DPP-4 inhibitor. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IV study conducted in Japan, 218 patients were randomized to trelagliptin 100 mg once weekly or a once- or twice-daily DPP-4 inhibitor for 12 weeks (NCT03014479; JapicCTI-173482). QOL and treatment satisfaction were assessed using the Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) Questionnaire and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), respectively. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in DTR-QOL total score at week 12. Secondary endpoints included further analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ components. Other endpoints included glycemic control, treatment adherence, and safety. RESULTS: The between-group difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in DTR-QOL total score was 2.418 (95% confidence interval − 1.546, 6.382; P = 0.2305). Analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ results by subscales and stratification generally showed a numerical improvement with trelagliptin over daily DPP-4 inhibitors. QOL and treatment satisfaction improved with a reduction in frequency of concurrent and study drug dosing. Treatment adherence was > 97% for both groups. The effect of trelagliptin on glycemic control was similar to that seen with daily DPP-4 inhibitors. Trelagliptin and daily DPP-4 inhibitors were well-tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly trelagliptin 100 mg administered for 12 weeks resulted in a numerically, but not statistically, greater improvement in QOL and treatment satisfaction versus daily DPP-4 inhibitors. The decision to administer once-weekly or daily DPP-4 inhibitor treatment is likely to depend on patient preferences and the treatment policies of physicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03014479) and JAPIC (JapicCTI-173482). FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-06-18 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6612345/ /pubmed/31214997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ishii, Hitoshi Suzaki, Yuki Miyata, Yuko Matsui, Shingo Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor |
title | Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor |
title_full | Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor |
title_fullStr | Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor |
title_short | Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor |
title_sort | randomized multicenter evaluation of quality of life and treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients receiving once-weekly trelagliptin versus a daily dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishiihitoshi randomizedmulticenterevaluationofqualityoflifeandtreatmentsatisfactionintype2diabetespatientsreceivingonceweeklytrelagliptinversusadailydipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitor AT suzakiyuki randomizedmulticenterevaluationofqualityoflifeandtreatmentsatisfactionintype2diabetespatientsreceivingonceweeklytrelagliptinversusadailydipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitor AT miyatayuko randomizedmulticenterevaluationofqualityoflifeandtreatmentsatisfactionintype2diabetespatientsreceivingonceweeklytrelagliptinversusadailydipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitor AT matsuishingo randomizedmulticenterevaluationofqualityoflifeandtreatmentsatisfactionintype2diabetespatientsreceivingonceweeklytrelagliptinversusadailydipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitor |