Cargando…

Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor

INTRODUCTION: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are an established treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction among treatment-naïve T2DM patients receiving once-weekly trelaglipt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishii, Hitoshi, Suzaki, Yuki, Miyata, Yuko, Matsui, Shingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1
_version_ 1783432867691364352
author Ishii, Hitoshi
Suzaki, Yuki
Miyata, Yuko
Matsui, Shingo
author_facet Ishii, Hitoshi
Suzaki, Yuki
Miyata, Yuko
Matsui, Shingo
author_sort Ishii, Hitoshi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are an established treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction among treatment-naïve T2DM patients receiving once-weekly trelagliptin or a daily DPP-4 inhibitor. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IV study conducted in Japan, 218 patients were randomized to trelagliptin 100 mg once weekly or a once- or twice-daily DPP-4 inhibitor for 12 weeks (NCT03014479; JapicCTI-173482). QOL and treatment satisfaction were assessed using the Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) Questionnaire and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), respectively. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in DTR-QOL total score at week 12. Secondary endpoints included further analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ components. Other endpoints included glycemic control, treatment adherence, and safety. RESULTS: The between-group difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in DTR-QOL total score was 2.418 (95% confidence interval − 1.546, 6.382; P = 0.2305). Analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ results by subscales and stratification generally showed a numerical improvement with trelagliptin over daily DPP-4 inhibitors. QOL and treatment satisfaction improved with a reduction in frequency of concurrent and study drug dosing. Treatment adherence was > 97% for both groups. The effect of trelagliptin on glycemic control was similar to that seen with daily DPP-4 inhibitors. Trelagliptin and daily DPP-4 inhibitors were well-tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly trelagliptin 100 mg administered for 12 weeks resulted in a numerically, but not statistically, greater improvement in QOL and treatment satisfaction versus daily DPP-4 inhibitors. The decision to administer once-weekly or daily DPP-4 inhibitor treatment is likely to depend on patient preferences and the treatment policies of physicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03014479) and JAPIC (JapicCTI-173482). FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66123452019-07-23 Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Ishii, Hitoshi Suzaki, Yuki Miyata, Yuko Matsui, Shingo Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are an established treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction among treatment-naïve T2DM patients receiving once-weekly trelagliptin or a daily DPP-4 inhibitor. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IV study conducted in Japan, 218 patients were randomized to trelagliptin 100 mg once weekly or a once- or twice-daily DPP-4 inhibitor for 12 weeks (NCT03014479; JapicCTI-173482). QOL and treatment satisfaction were assessed using the Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) Questionnaire and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), respectively. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in DTR-QOL total score at week 12. Secondary endpoints included further analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ components. Other endpoints included glycemic control, treatment adherence, and safety. RESULTS: The between-group difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in DTR-QOL total score was 2.418 (95% confidence interval − 1.546, 6.382; P = 0.2305). Analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ results by subscales and stratification generally showed a numerical improvement with trelagliptin over daily DPP-4 inhibitors. QOL and treatment satisfaction improved with a reduction in frequency of concurrent and study drug dosing. Treatment adherence was > 97% for both groups. The effect of trelagliptin on glycemic control was similar to that seen with daily DPP-4 inhibitors. Trelagliptin and daily DPP-4 inhibitors were well-tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly trelagliptin 100 mg administered for 12 weeks resulted in a numerically, but not statistically, greater improvement in QOL and treatment satisfaction versus daily DPP-4 inhibitors. The decision to administer once-weekly or daily DPP-4 inhibitor treatment is likely to depend on patient preferences and the treatment policies of physicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03014479) and JAPIC (JapicCTI-173482). FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-06-18 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6612345/ /pubmed/31214997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ishii, Hitoshi
Suzaki, Yuki
Miyata, Yuko
Matsui, Shingo
Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
title Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
title_full Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
title_fullStr Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
title_short Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
title_sort randomized multicenter evaluation of quality of life and treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients receiving once-weekly trelagliptin versus a daily dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31214997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-0643-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ishiihitoshi randomizedmulticenterevaluationofqualityoflifeandtreatmentsatisfactionintype2diabetespatientsreceivingonceweeklytrelagliptinversusadailydipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitor
AT suzakiyuki randomizedmulticenterevaluationofqualityoflifeandtreatmentsatisfactionintype2diabetespatientsreceivingonceweeklytrelagliptinversusadailydipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitor
AT miyatayuko randomizedmulticenterevaluationofqualityoflifeandtreatmentsatisfactionintype2diabetespatientsreceivingonceweeklytrelagliptinversusadailydipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitor
AT matsuishingo randomizedmulticenterevaluationofqualityoflifeandtreatmentsatisfactionintype2diabetespatientsreceivingonceweeklytrelagliptinversusadailydipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitor