Cargando…

On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system

The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&G modeling in stereotactic p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vieillevigne, Laure, Khamphan, Catherine, Saez, Jordi, Hernandez, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31225938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656
_version_ 1783432919051665408
author Vieillevigne, Laure
Khamphan, Catherine
Saez, Jordi
Hernandez, Victor
author_facet Vieillevigne, Laure
Khamphan, Catherine
Saez, Jordi
Hernandez, Victor
author_sort Vieillevigne, Laure
collection PubMed
description The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLG(meas)) and an optimal DLG (DLG(opt)). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLG(meas) and DLG(opt), and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (P < 0.0001). By using DLG(meas) in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLG(opt) led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) > 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLG(opt) could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66126992019-07-16 On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system Vieillevigne, Laure Khamphan, Catherine Saez, Jordi Hernandez, Victor J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLG(meas)) and an optimal DLG (DLG(opt)). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLG(meas) and DLG(opt), and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (P < 0.0001). By using DLG(meas) in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLG(opt) led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) > 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLG(opt) could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6612699/ /pubmed/31225938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Vieillevigne, Laure
Khamphan, Catherine
Saez, Jordi
Hernandez, Victor
On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_fullStr On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_full_unstemmed On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_short On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
title_sort on the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the eclipse treatment planning system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31225938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656
work_keys_str_mv AT vieillevignelaure ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT khamphancatherine ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT saezjordi ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem
AT hernandezvictor ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem