Cargando…
On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system
The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&G modeling in stereotactic p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31225938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656 |
_version_ | 1783432919051665408 |
---|---|
author | Vieillevigne, Laure Khamphan, Catherine Saez, Jordi Hernandez, Victor |
author_facet | Vieillevigne, Laure Khamphan, Catherine Saez, Jordi Hernandez, Victor |
author_sort | Vieillevigne, Laure |
collection | PubMed |
description | The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLG(meas)) and an optimal DLG (DLG(opt)). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLG(meas) and DLG(opt), and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (P < 0.0001). By using DLG(meas) in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLG(opt) led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) > 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLG(opt) could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6612699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66126992019-07-16 On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system Vieillevigne, Laure Khamphan, Catherine Saez, Jordi Hernandez, Victor J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and tongue‐and‐groove (T&G) effects are critical aspects in the modeling of multileaf collimators (MLC) in the treatment planning system (TPS). In this study, we investigated the dosimetric impact of limitations associated with the T&G modeling in stereotactic plans and its relationship with the need for tuning the DLG in the Eclipse TPS. Measurements were carried out using Varian TrueBeam STx systems from two different institutions. Test fields presenting MLC patterns with several MLC gap sizes (meanGap) and different amounts of T&G effect (TGi) were first evaluated. Secondly, dynamic conformal arc (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries of stereotactic cases were analyzed in terms of meanGap and TGi. Two DLG values were used in the TPS: the measured DLG (DLG(meas)) and an optimal DLG (DLG(opt)). Measured and calculated doses were compared according to dose differences and gamma passing rates (GPR) with strict local gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm. The discrepancies were analyzed for DLG(meas) and DLG(opt), and their relationships with both TGi and meanGap were investigated. DCA arcs involved significantly lower TGi and larger meanGap than VMAT arcs (P < 0.0001). By using DLG(meas) in the TPS, the dose discrepancies increased as TGi increased and meanGap decreased for both test fields and clinical plans. Dose discrepancies dramatically increased with the ratio TGi/meanGap. Adjusting the DLG value was then required to achieve acceptable calculations and configuring the TPS with DLG(opt) led to an excellent agreement with median GPRs (2%/2 mm) > 99% for both institutions. We also showed that DLG(opt) could be obtained from the results of the test fields. We demonstrated that the need for tuning the DLG is due to the limitations of the T&G modeling in the Eclipse TPS. A set of sweeping gap tests modified to incorporate T&G effects can be used to determine the optimal DLG value. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6612699/ /pubmed/31225938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Vieillevigne, Laure Khamphan, Catherine Saez, Jordi Hernandez, Victor On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system |
title | On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system |
title_full | On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system |
title_fullStr | On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system |
title_full_unstemmed | On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system |
title_short | On the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the Eclipse treatment planning system |
title_sort | on the need for tuning the dosimetric leaf gap for stereotactic treatment plans in the eclipse treatment planning system |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31225938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieillevignelaure ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem AT khamphancatherine ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem AT saezjordi ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem AT hernandezvictor ontheneedfortuningthedosimetricleafgapforstereotactictreatmentplansintheeclipsetreatmentplanningsystem |