Cargando…

Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual

OBJECTIVE. Determine the acceptability, perceived usefulness, and adoption of implementation tools and technical assistance provided by the Health Technology Assessment Institute (IETS) in hospitals in two regions of Colombia. METHODS. Assistance was provided for implementation of clinical practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez Moreno, Jaime Hernán, Romero Vergara, Antonio José, De Alba De Moya, Danilo De Jesús, Jaramillo Rojas, Hernán Javier, Díaz Rojas, Claudia Milena, Ciapponi, Agustín
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591335
http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2017.49
_version_ 1783432924839804928
author Rodríguez Moreno, Jaime Hernán
Romero Vergara, Antonio José
De Alba De Moya, Danilo De Jesús
Jaramillo Rojas, Hernán Javier
Díaz Rojas, Claudia Milena
Ciapponi, Agustín
author_facet Rodríguez Moreno, Jaime Hernán
Romero Vergara, Antonio José
De Alba De Moya, Danilo De Jesús
Jaramillo Rojas, Hernán Javier
Díaz Rojas, Claudia Milena
Ciapponi, Agustín
author_sort Rodríguez Moreno, Jaime Hernán
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE. Determine the acceptability, perceived usefulness, and adoption of implementation tools and technical assistance provided by the Health Technology Assessment Institute (IETS) in hospitals in two regions of Colombia. METHODS. Assistance was provided for implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in 24 hospitals (17 in Antioquia and seven in Cundinamarca) in areas with high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections, and for use of the implementation tools. Health professionals were given surveys and medical specialists were interviewed. RESULTS. Overall, 86% of respondents are familiar with the GPGs, 86% with the tracer recommendations, 79% with the interactive flow charts, and 82% with the evidence sheets, while 41% never used the implementation tools. Of the respondents who used the tools, 55% did so on their work computer, while 24% used their personal telephone. The most useful tools were the evidence sheets and flow charts (98%) and the tracer recommendations (92%). The least useful were the budgetary impact tools (81%). CONCLUSIONS. The implementation tools and technical assistance provided in hospitals in two regions of Colombia are perceived as useful and acceptable, although the degree of implementation is low. The findings of this research will help the different actors, such as the Ministry of Health and Social Protection, the IETS, and the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (Colciencias), among others, improve their programs for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6612726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Organización Panamericana de la Salud
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66127262019-07-30 Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual Rodríguez Moreno, Jaime Hernán Romero Vergara, Antonio José De Alba De Moya, Danilo De Jesús Jaramillo Rojas, Hernán Javier Díaz Rojas, Claudia Milena Ciapponi, Agustín Rev Panam Salud Publica Investigación Original OBJECTIVE. Determine the acceptability, perceived usefulness, and adoption of implementation tools and technical assistance provided by the Health Technology Assessment Institute (IETS) in hospitals in two regions of Colombia. METHODS. Assistance was provided for implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in 24 hospitals (17 in Antioquia and seven in Cundinamarca) in areas with high prevalence of sexually transmitted infections, and for use of the implementation tools. Health professionals were given surveys and medical specialists were interviewed. RESULTS. Overall, 86% of respondents are familiar with the GPGs, 86% with the tracer recommendations, 79% with the interactive flow charts, and 82% with the evidence sheets, while 41% never used the implementation tools. Of the respondents who used the tools, 55% did so on their work computer, while 24% used their personal telephone. The most useful tools were the evidence sheets and flow charts (98%) and the tracer recommendations (92%). The least useful were the budgetary impact tools (81%). CONCLUSIONS. The implementation tools and technical assistance provided in hospitals in two regions of Colombia are perceived as useful and acceptable, although the degree of implementation is low. The findings of this research will help the different actors, such as the Ministry of Health and Social Protection, the IETS, and the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (Colciencias), among others, improve their programs for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2017-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6612726/ /pubmed/28591335 http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2017.49 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  
spellingShingle Investigación Original
Rodríguez Moreno, Jaime Hernán
Romero Vergara, Antonio José
De Alba De Moya, Danilo De Jesús
Jaramillo Rojas, Hernán Javier
Díaz Rojas, Claudia Milena
Ciapponi, Agustín
Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual
title Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual
title_full Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual
title_fullStr Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual
title_short Evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la Guía de Práctica Clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual
title_sort evaluación de herramientas de implementación de la guía de práctica clínica de infecciones de transmisión sexual
topic Investigación Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28591335
http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2017.49
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezmorenojaimehernan evaluaciondeherramientasdeimplementaciondelaguiadepracticaclinicadeinfeccionesdetransmisionsexual
AT romerovergaraantoniojose evaluaciondeherramientasdeimplementaciondelaguiadepracticaclinicadeinfeccionesdetransmisionsexual
AT dealbademoyadanilodejesus evaluaciondeherramientasdeimplementaciondelaguiadepracticaclinicadeinfeccionesdetransmisionsexual
AT jaramillorojashernanjavier evaluaciondeherramientasdeimplementaciondelaguiadepracticaclinicadeinfeccionesdetransmisionsexual
AT diazrojasclaudiamilena evaluaciondeherramientasdeimplementaciondelaguiadepracticaclinicadeinfeccionesdetransmisionsexual
AT ciapponiagustin evaluaciondeherramientasdeimplementaciondelaguiadepracticaclinicadeinfeccionesdetransmisionsexual