Cargando…
Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities on cardiac imaging (cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [CMR] or positron emission tomography [PET]), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and electrophysiology study (EPS) all predict ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We sought to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31321283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.03.002 |
_version_ | 1783432929879261184 |
---|---|
author | Okada, David R. Smith, John Derakhshan, Arsalan Gowani, Zain Zimmerman, Stefan L. Misra, Satish Berger, Ronald D. Calkins, Hugh Tandri, Harikrishna Chrispin, Jonathan |
author_facet | Okada, David R. Smith, John Derakhshan, Arsalan Gowani, Zain Zimmerman, Stefan L. Misra, Satish Berger, Ronald D. Calkins, Hugh Tandri, Harikrishna Chrispin, Jonathan |
author_sort | Okada, David R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Abnormalities on cardiac imaging (cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [CMR] or positron emission tomography [PET]), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and electrophysiology study (EPS) all predict ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We sought to assess the utility of EPS in patients with CS and abnormal cardiac imaging, focusing on those with LVEF >35%. METHODS: We identified all patients treated at our institution from 2000 to 2017 who: 1.) had probable or definite CS; 2.) had either late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR or abnormal 18-flourodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET, and 3.) had undergone EPS. The primary endpoint was VA during follow up. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were included, of whom 10 (40%) had positive EPS. During a mean follow-up of 4.8 +/− 3.4 years, 11 (44%) patients had VA. The positive predictive value (PPV) of EPS for VA was 100% and the negative predictive value (NPV) of EPS for VA was 93%. Among 12 patients with LVEF >35% and no prior VA, the PPV of EPS for VA was 100% and the NPV of EPS for VA was 90%. CONCLUSION: EPS may help with risk stratification in patients with CS and abnormal imaging, especially those without conventional indications for ICD placement. Among patients with LVEF >35% and no history of prior VA, a negative EPS has good positive and negative predictive value for future VA events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6612749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66127492019-07-18 Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging Okada, David R. Smith, John Derakhshan, Arsalan Gowani, Zain Zimmerman, Stefan L. Misra, Satish Berger, Ronald D. Calkins, Hugh Tandri, Harikrishna Chrispin, Jonathan Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: Abnormalities on cardiac imaging (cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [CMR] or positron emission tomography [PET]), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and electrophysiology study (EPS) all predict ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We sought to assess the utility of EPS in patients with CS and abnormal cardiac imaging, focusing on those with LVEF >35%. METHODS: We identified all patients treated at our institution from 2000 to 2017 who: 1.) had probable or definite CS; 2.) had either late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR or abnormal 18-flourodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET, and 3.) had undergone EPS. The primary endpoint was VA during follow up. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were included, of whom 10 (40%) had positive EPS. During a mean follow-up of 4.8 +/− 3.4 years, 11 (44%) patients had VA. The positive predictive value (PPV) of EPS for VA was 100% and the negative predictive value (NPV) of EPS for VA was 93%. Among 12 patients with LVEF >35% and no prior VA, the PPV of EPS for VA was 100% and the NPV of EPS for VA was 90%. CONCLUSION: EPS may help with risk stratification in patients with CS and abnormal imaging, especially those without conventional indications for ICD placement. Among patients with LVEF >35% and no history of prior VA, a negative EPS has good positive and negative predictive value for future VA events. Elsevier 2019-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6612749/ /pubmed/31321283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.03.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Okada, David R. Smith, John Derakhshan, Arsalan Gowani, Zain Zimmerman, Stefan L. Misra, Satish Berger, Ronald D. Calkins, Hugh Tandri, Harikrishna Chrispin, Jonathan Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging |
title | Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging |
title_full | Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging |
title_fullStr | Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging |
title_short | Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging |
title_sort | electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6612749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31321283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.03.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okadadavidr electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT smithjohn electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT derakhshanarsalan electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT gowanizain electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT zimmermanstefanl electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT misrasatish electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT bergerronaldd electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT calkinshugh electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT tandriharikrishna electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging AT chrispinjonathan electrophysiologystudyforriskstratificationinpatientswithcardiacsarcoidosisandabnormalcardiacimaging |